NOVATOWNHALL

has been reconceptualized yet again

Dumb Women on Dumb Women

March 2nd, 2008 by jack

Well, the Washington Post has outdone itself for stupidity today. In not one, but two op-ed pieces, stupid women have penned stupid articles about how stupid women are. As the husband of a highly intelligent wife and the parent of three highly intelligent daughters, I was, frankly, disgusted.

The first article, by Charlotte Allen, starts off griping about women “swooning” at Obama rallies. Never mind that, to get such a front-row position, one must stand in line for hours. Never mind that the Secret Service often forbids bringing liquids. So people faint. What a surprise.

She follows up this nonsense with this beauty:

Depressing as it is, several of the supposed misogynist myths about female inferiority have been proven true. Women really are worse drivers than men, for example. A study published in 1998 by the Johns Hopkins schools of medicine and public health revealed that women clocked 5.7 auto accidents per million miles driven, in contrast to men’s 5.1, even though men drive about 74 percent more miles a year than women.

So men have 74% more practice driving. How surprising that one gets better from practice.

She concludes with this gem:

So I don’t understand why more women don’t relax, enjoy the innate abilities most of us possess (as well as the ones fewer of us possess) and revel in the things most important to life at which nearly all of us excel: tenderness toward children and men and the weak and the ability to make a house a home…. Then we could shriek and swoon and gossip and read chick lit to our hearts’ content and not mind the fact that way down deep, we are . . . kind of dim.

I think I’m gonna be sick. Is this what I should teach my girls, “Well, girls are kind of dim, so just be a good little housewife”?

But wait, there’s more. In a companion article, Linda Hirshman laments

Black voters of all socioeconomic classes are voting for the black candidate. Men are voting for the male candidate regardless of race or class. But even though this is also a year with the first major female presidential candidate, women are split every way they can be. They’re the only voting bloc not voting their bloc.

[The] women’s vote has fragmented. The only conclusion: American women still aren’t strategic enough to form a meaningful political movement directed at taking power. Will they ever be?

So she’s complaining that women vote policies, not genitals. What shall we do if Obama wins the nomination, have him and McCain “whip it out” onstage, so Hirshman can vote for the bigger candidate?

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 2nd, 2008 at 1:22 pm and is filed under Culture, media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 responses about “Dumb Women on Dumb Women”

  1. Joe Budzinski said:

    Wow, the Post has really outdone itself this time in terms of providing the full spectrum.

    The first column is saying to women “let’s admit we’re all idiots” - for the sake of Obama, apparently - and the second bemoans the failure of identity politics. On the one side, mindless cult of personality, and on the other, sociopathic leftism.

    Well, which is it gonna be, women of America?

  2. ACTivist said:

    What would Gloria say or do? Where is she on this one? All those bras of old that were destroyed for the cause. Makes women seem “fadish”. Glad my girls lived under my tyranny. I’m an equal oppotunity dad. They learned that they are and always will be equal. Don’t need any June Cleavers.

  3. jacob said:

    Apparently the WP changed the headline on the website. The Washington compost now claims the whole thing was a big joke. Everyone who beleives this stand on their head

Leave a Reply