Comments on: Left Wing Censorship

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:06:57 +0000

“Eventually as your comments are de-spammed it is supposed to learn to permit you to post multiple links in your comments.”

Good luck with that — I still have to go in and approve my own posts.

By: jacob

jacob — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:00:22 +0000

Jonathon,
MSM is dominated by those who vote left. CBS, NBC, ABC etc are staafed by socialists, edited by socialists, and owned by socialists. This means that 90% of the news is processed by socialists a.k.a. members of the Democrat party. You are blowing smoke. Silencing someone in the public square is miles away from not voting for someone who is homosexual, as is the case at the LCRC.

By: ACTivist

ACTivist — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:22:04 +0000

“Move along, move along.”
Empirial soldier to Luke Skywalker and Obewan Kenobi-Star Wars IV- A New Hope.

By: NYmike11

NYmike11 — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:04:01 +0000

As referred to earlier – it is time for the MoveOn left to just move along, step aside, and fade away – when $100 oil and $3 gas is back in late September – and the markets will have done what markets do – the last of the left’s mantra of complaints, the platforms on which they stand, will be gone. Move along, move along.

By: ACTivist

ACTivist — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:17:33 +0000

Jonathan,

Still trying to get that recognition for your “raving” ways, I see. Try hitting on the Main Stream Media (I had to spell it out so that you didn’t mis-understand its meaning for the usual Men having Sex with Men as the Swedes have shown) who help censor anything the liberal messiah requests. Or maybe McCain/Feingold. There are plenty more. I don’t want you censored, I just want your “agenda” in the background.

By: ACTivist

ACTivist — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:07:45 +0000

Laurie,
You’re drinking the wrong wine. Try Night Train. That will put some step in your caboose and allow you to see the finer side of liberal idiocy.

By: joe

joe — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:25:32 +0000

JW, Your comment was put in moderation because of the links, that’s how the spam filter is set. Eventually as your comments are de-spammed it is supposed to learn to permit you to post multiple links in your comments.

By: Laura V

Laura V — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:06:12 +0000

G. Stone- you really don’t need to say anything twice, please. Unlike wine, your comments neither improve with age or the second or third glass.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:18:16 +0000

ummm,

I’m almost afraid to say this, but I just posted a comment describing Loudoun censorship cases (LGBT Republicans, penguin books, and school plays) and I guess my comment contained key words that triggered this blog’s censor’s ire. Needless to say, my comment was censored.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:07:28 +0000

Locally – and you know what they say, as Loudoun goes, so goes the U.S.A – censorship actually appears to be a trademark of the right.

For example, there was the recent blow-up on Too Conservative which illustrated that one faction in the LCRC would like to “censor” LGBT people out of the Republican Committee, and if the “Farissites”, like Mr. cross (-t), had their way, all the way out of existence. See:

http://www.equalityloudoun.org/?p=723

Then there have been two pretty high profile cases of censorship in the Loudoun County School system. Both organized by the right. There was the bold opposition to penguin books:

http://www.equalityloudoun.org/index.php?s=tango

And, of course, the famous censorship of the student authored play “Offsides”:

http://www.equalityloudoun.org/?page_id=247

You may try to spin this until hell freezes over Jacob, but you simply can’t produce any local censorship activity that comes close to these Herculean efforts. Yes, we know that pro-science academics may have “censored” the idea that the earth is less than 6000 years old and that Adam and Eve rode out of Eden on the back of a Brontosaurus. That act of “censorship”, however didn’t seem to create nearly the fuss. Go Figure.

By: The Bulletproof Monk

The Bulletproof Monk — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:07:06 +0000

Jacob, I never seem to remember your contributions as standing out in my memory…but the “pajamahadeen” passage is a keeper, and hilarious in that ” so real it has to be funny” kind of way!!!!!!

By: Cathymac

Cathymac — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:21:07 +0000

Yes, when the target (by liberals) is conservatives using satire, but the liberals manage to infuriate their own, there is something missing between the ears.

By: G. Stone

G. Stone — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:57:26 +0000

I will say it again.

G. Stone said:
July 15th, 2008 at 7:28 am

Liberals lampooning a liberal in order to poke conservatives with a stick and they end up poking themselves in the eye.

These people just aren’t that smart.

By: ACTivist

ACTivist — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:52:58 +0000

Jacob,

BTW Doesn’t that look like the outside of the UN building where his picture is being installed? Makes you think, doesn’t it.

By: ACTivist

ACTivist — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:50:20 +0000

Jacob,
It’s just a zimzo ploy. He probably is a hunter and believes in your 2nd amendment rights too. This is the “new” mantle of liberal speak.