Implosion! The clip doesn’t bode well for McCain’t where he is “generally” aligned with Hilly but we knew this election was another “hold-your-nose” election. I believe that Osama-bama is going to take racism to a whole new level which will bring us back to before the Civil War. Way to go, Bore-rock. You’re an idiot and I guess that makes me a racist now because I don’t like you.

Let’s look on the brightside, the Democrats will be fighting a civil war while they’re trying to take on McCain. Let’s just hope it gets really nasty in October.

where did foxnews find this one? i like the comment “if you take a narrow view of the issues” then clinton is closer to obama, but a broader view…i think there is some insight developing there. the clinton campagin was way, way more negative and they did more to inflame racial tensions than the obama campaign.

but these supporters of clinton are simply upset they lost something, fairly, that felt they deserved and really should have won. but don’t be too optimistic, by the time of the election and after some coverage of mccain’s jokes, his affair that is as if not more disturbing than edwards’, and his pro-life stance, i think these clinton supporters will do what they expected obama supporters to do…get behind the candidate that supports their positions, and the best candidate.

that ‘culture of victimization’ stuff sounds like a limbaugh line of dismissing people that are discriminated against (while weirdly claiming that you are a victim). this is nothing more than being a sore loser, and i’m sure many supporters are still upset. they should have won this easily and they lost it so closely. but this is not unique to dems.

and i just thought it was a funny thing she said. if you have a candidate that shares the views of the person you supported and your own views, why would you support another candidate that is different in issues that are most important to you?

jacob, the answer to each of those is a yes. as they say, some things are true, whether you believe them or not. you try to explain how any of those can be a no.

the lack of unity now is due to a close primary with two strong candidates, unlike the republicans, which had a about a dozen weak ones that turned out to be a run away. again, i’m guessing that the assault on mccain will come and as his beliefs become more apparent, the hilary voters will come around.

i would say legally there is no more discrimination for the most part. and discrimination by gender and race (and sexual orientation, religion, etc.) are each different. but even you seem to be conceding that it exists, by race anyway. as for sharpton, i’ve never understood him. there are people really struggling and he seems to bring all this media attention to people that seem to either be wrong or crazy. of course, that could also be media bias for sensational stories. things have certainly gotten better in my opinion, but to say discrimiation or bias does not exist is a little silly. in fact, i would say that seems to be part of the problem. i think of it in two ways. a key one is this, the appearance of a person brings all kinds of preexisting, subconcious biases and one of the first things that people notice about another person is their race.

and i wish i could share you optimism and be sure obama is going to win this election. i’m pretty concerned.

you don’t need to look that hard, you just have to think for a moment.

this ‘experience’ and ‘foreign policy’ argument is really nonsense. they said it about w, clinton, i imagine reagan (though i was too young, but i know the extremist view stuff came up), and i’m certain about carter. no matter your politics, you would say some were good, some were terrible. and i know all of these guys ran states, but really each of them is known for policy accomplishments and failures. successes usually came from charisma and inate leadership qualities, and a little of lucky timing. i’m convinced experience really doesn’t matter, obama’s an extremely intelligent guy who will surround himself with experienced advisors. it’s really a matter of supporting their policies, and i agree much more with obama than mccain. you clearly don’t.

correct me if i’m wrong, but i think everyone on here would prefer some charasmatic state legislator from virginia that promised to strickly enforce immigration laws, opposed same sex marriage, and ensured everyone could carry a concealed automatic weapon for protection over mccain, even though he has tons of seasoning in foreign and domestic affairs.

two thoughts reading your post. first, by conceding my last point you are really saying that experience really doesn’t matter in your selection. i’m not saying foreign policy doesn’t matter, but this experience with it doesn’t matter. i can’t think of anyone that was in republican field more experienced than mccain, so why wouldn’t you pick him? it’s policies and leadership, not experience. and bush sr.’s coalition was stronger because iraq invaded a country, that makes it a little easier to get other countries on board. by the way, what is the big issue with mccain?

second, i’m glad to see someone so slack in their writing and they may exceed me in grammatical errors.

now, time for the show.