novatownhall blog

updated, and a little more mellow

Another reason to vote against Obama

Author | joe | Posted on | September 27, 2008 | 27 Comments

Barack Obama’s a thug, plain and simple. He shouldn’t be allowed any closer to the White House than Lafayette Park.

Imagine what this cretin would try to do as president … No wonder he is so amenable to meeting face to face with the dictators of Iran and North Korea: There is a natural bond.

More on Obama’s thug tactics here.

Comments

27 Responses to “Another reason to vote against Obama”

  1. bob F
    September 27th, 2008 @ 9:04 pm

    WHAT?? How the heck can he do that???

  2. el jefe
    September 27th, 2008 @ 9:30 pm

    an example of the thuggary, a strongly worded letter by an attorney:

    http://www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/ObamaLetterNRAAd.pdf

    how dare he insist the nra not lie in commericals, it’s at the heart of any successful nra campaign!

  3. Kevin
    September 27th, 2008 @ 9:38 pm

    First of all, somebody has been sippin’ a little long on the vino because this post makes very little sense. If there were a law against spamming your own site I would declare you guilty. In effect, what you’ve done is to link someone who incessantly links themselves such that you have to sift through hours of torturous pontification upon torturous self-indulgent pontification. The only thing you’ve done is cause one to spend hours on somebody else’s site looking for the point. Not exactly the way you want to grow readership.

    Second of all, what is your point? Is your party so scared that you’ve resorted to ad hominem attacks?

    Stinko.

  4. Jack
    September 27th, 2008 @ 9:41 pm

    el jefe — What Kennedy said, and what the LAW HE WROTE said, were two entirely different things.

  5. Mr. Whiskers
    September 27th, 2008 @ 9:44 pm

    That is some serious code language. I don’t get what this post is about. Meow

  6. joe
    September 27th, 2008 @ 10:08 pm

    Yeah it is quite an indecipherable code, my feline antagonist. You might have noticed – were you not so distracted by the catnip-filled baby duck – that a candidate who attempts to use the machinery of government to quell dissent before said candidate even formally has any control over said machinery, bodes poorly for free speech.

    If Obama is sic’ing the cops on his detractors now, I think as president he will make Waco look like a kickball game.

  7. zimzo
    September 27th, 2008 @ 10:11 pm

    I was especially chilled when a prosecutor said that if somebody says something is not true true they are going to “point out” that it is not true. Truly scary.

    I’m going to vote for John McCain now. Only he can get comprehensive immigration reform passed, which includes amnesty for illegal immigrants anyway.

  8. joe
    September 27th, 2008 @ 10:20 pm

    Heh, yes, modern politics makes strange bedfellows does it not? I know my principles are in a blind trust, and I can live with that. Hey, how about them Mets?

  9. jacob
    September 27th, 2008 @ 11:18 pm

    Leave it to zimzo, when it is a Democrat infringing on someones rights to make light of it. The Mets will blow it Joe, they always do.

  10. dans
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:20 am

    Yes everyone is relying on factcheck.org to refute NRA’s claims.

    “There’s another possible explanation behind FactCheck’s positions. Just last year, FactCheck’s primary funding source, the Annenberg Foundation, also gave $50,000 to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence for “efforts to reduce gun violence by educating the public and by enacting and enforcing regulations governing the gun industry.” Annenberg made a similar grant for $100,000 in 2005.”

    The links below confirm the connections between factcheck.org, Brandy Center and the Annenburg Foundation. And oh yes, Obama as well..

    Factcheck.org

    Guidestar

    Obama Requests Earmarks for Annenburg Affiliate

    Small world isn’t it ? Obama is a thug.

  11. dans
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:56 am

    Even smaller world, Ayers is also connected to Annenburg..

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTgwZTVmN2QyNzk2MmUxMzA5OTg0ODZlM2Y2OGI0NDM=

    So now we have it. Factcheck, Brady Center, Annenberg, Ayers and Obama are bedfellows.

  12. Obama for Omerica
    September 28th, 2008 @ 7:09 am

    New Obama Campaign Poster Released for Missouri

    Campaign is testing it out there and will be going national with it in all 57 states if they can get away with it.

    Here is the Link:
    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n317/zuule/BarryObummer/WelcomeToMissouri.jpg

  13. Joe Budzinski
    September 28th, 2008 @ 8:32 am

    Wow, great research, Dan. Thanks for that.

  14. Joe Budzinski
    September 28th, 2008 @ 8:42 am

    Obama = slimebucket. Recording a Spanish language ad that calls McCain a bigot because of the battle over comprehensive immigration reform. McCain was on the OTHER SIDE of that battle. He was 100% on the side of amnesty. Unbelievable.

    It’s stuff like this – well, plus Sarah Palin – that has me motivated to do more than just pull the lever on November 4th. I thought I would spend September and October blogging about NASCAR and not giving a penny or second of my time to any campaigns, but there really is a huge difference in our choices.

    Yeah McCain sucks on illegal immigration, but so does Bush and we managed to fend that one off. And slimebucket Obama has promised to be WORSE than McCain.

    The way I see it illegal immigration is not the only issue facing us, so there’s that. But in addition, the threat of illegal immigration is that it threatens to bring down America. That point needs to be impressed upon our political leader and if they do not understand it it is our job to explain it to them.

    But if the political leader is a guy like Obama who hates America in the first place, there’s no point in even having the conversation.

  15. AFF
    September 28th, 2008 @ 9:44 am

    How dare the democrats stand up and publicly object when they are blatantly slandered! Didn’t they get the memo abut greasing their asses and grabbing their ankles? How else are the GOP supposed to campaign without lies and slander?

    Let me put this in Palin speak so you guys can better understand- the cops and other public officials will be taking off their cop hats, and putting on their citizen hats.

  16. dans
    September 28th, 2008 @ 10:02 am

    AFF, the allegations are true, and a matter of public record.

    If you seek the truth, you shall find it..

  17. Kevin
    September 28th, 2008 @ 10:06 am

    Wow, Joe! You really are coming out swinging on the Big O (”who hates America in the first place”). I don’t generally get a chance to see you use that type of empty rhetoric until you get really angry/worried.

    In turn, McCain=compost pile.

  18. AFF
    September 28th, 2008 @ 10:34 am

    The allegations are true? GOOD!

    Democrats are organizing against slanderous campaigning? GOOD!

    Democrats are funding respected non-profits whose mission is to play referee and check facts? GOOD

    It’s about time Democrats started bringing firearms to duels.

  19. Cathymac
    September 28th, 2008 @ 10:44 am

    AFF, this is what is wrong with Obama’s attempts to silence his critics:

    http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem

  20. Leej
    September 28th, 2008 @ 11:34 am

    Illegal immigration is way down since the economy and the building business has tanked.
    Keep the economy in the toilet and we will not have to worry about immigration anymore ;-)

  21. dans
    September 28th, 2008 @ 11:41 am

    Yes, it is true that Democrats are organizing against FACTUAL campaigning.

    How do you think Obama even made it this far ? If it were not for the suppression of FACT, he would still be in Illinois.

  22. Mr. Whiskers
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:06 pm

    Cathymac, I still fail to see how that link you posted is any help to explaining what everyone is so worked up about? Basically, it’s a statement from a Gov complaining that free speech is being limited without ever giving one example of how? It intonates that some horrible crime has been committed without providing the evidence. Out of context, it just amounts to slander.

    Joe, thanks for pointing me in the direction (without actually explaining what specific crime has been committed) of what you are so repugnant of. Who wouldn’t be hitting the catnip-filled baby duck after the last 8 years! If you want to talk about a president making Waco look like a kickball game, look no further than the current administration and Republican party! I mean, the idea that your phones are being tapped; phone companies are being protected from lawsuits after allowing the government to use them to break the law; people are being scooped up and flown to other countries to be tortured under the dark of night; the government is monitoring what you check out at the library; the US Attorney quelling dissent by firing everyone who wants to uphold the law. . .I mean, the list of grievances is longer than this kitty can hold in his short term memory.

    Then you get this Guber in MO complaining about. . .something. . .he is alleging Obama did? If anyone is interested in a police state it’s your party and you are looking to continue that with John McCain.

    (purrr)

  23. Cathymac
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:15 pm

    Mr Whiskers, Go back to your litter box, it’s obvious you have something stuck in your bum that is keeping your from thinking straight. If you don’t see how free speech is being limited by Obama’s threats perhaps you need to go back to elementary school, my kids grasp the problem, but then again, you are a cat…..

  24. Mr. Whiskers
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:26 pm

    Cathymac, show me, in your linked statement, one threat Obama made? Are you stark raving mad? Surely you must know something this little kitty doesn’t. I can find no example, in your Guber’s statement, of an instance where Obama is threatening anybody!?

  25. AFF
    September 28th, 2008 @ 12:31 pm

    Cmac’s link actually gave me a giggle…. and I thought I got it all out last night watching SNL

  26. Wolverine
    September 28th, 2008 @ 7:02 pm

    I love it, El Jefe! An Obama backer writes a letter of protest about an NRA ad and cites the Washington Post as his authentication. Where have I seen that before? Oh, yes:

    Reporter: “Mr Lenin, are you absolutely certain that the opposition is telling us lies?”

    Mr.Lenin: “Absolutely! You can verify it with our independent fact checker over here. Mr. Trotsky, can you provide us with your research on this matter?”

  27. G. Stone
    September 29th, 2008 @ 4:17 pm

    The way I see it illegal immigration is not the only issue facing us, so there’s that. But in addition, the threat of illegal immigration is that it threatens to bring down America. That point needs to be impressed upon our political leader and if they do not understand it it is our job to explain it to them.

    Joe, ya man and…………..

    Illegal immigration will indeed be Americas demise, unless of course Barrack Obama is elected president and completely ruins the country well before the invaders can amass on our borders. They will peer into what was once America, turn around and go home.

Leave a Reply





  • Message to Democrats

  • Good Guy Award

    joe_wilson_fan_club.jpg
  • NICE WORK, AMERICA

  • U.S. Apology Tour 2008-12


  • Fight Mass Hysteria

    Save the Earth -
    FROM INSANITY!

    Eco-Freaks by John Berlau
  • Quote of the New Year

    Last March, NASA reported the oceans have been cooling for the last five years. Sea level has stopped rising, and Northern Hemisphere cyclone and hurricane activity is at a 24-year low.

    Environmental extremists and global warming alarmists are in denial and running for cover. Their rationale for continuing a lost cause is that weather events in the short term are not necessarily related to long-term climatic trends. But these are the same people who screamed at us each year that ordinary weather events such as high temperatures or hurricanes were undeniable evidence of imminent doom.

    Now that global warming is over, politicians are finally ready to enact dubious solutions to a non-existent problem. In Britain, Parliament is intrepidly forging ahead with a bold new plan to cool the climate, even as London experienced its first October snowfall since 1934 and Ireland went through the coldest October in the last 70 years.

    This is an absurd spectacle. Our advanced civilization is being systematically mismanaged by technologically illiterate lawyers responding to political pressures from irrational fanatics. Would someone please tell these people it is impossible to overturn the laws of thermodynamics?

    David Deming
  • Ecosystem