Comments on: The Judicial Oath http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/ updated, and a little more mellow Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:51:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Had Enough http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/comment-page-1/#comment-26202 Had Enough Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:41:43 +0000 http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/#comment-26202 Senate claiming no public outrage on Sotomayor. Either they are lying or people are giving up hope on this nation. The hearings were a sick pandering joke, she did not answer one question without spinning and batting her eyes so fast that I thought she would take flight any second. Her nervousness and untruthfulness showed in her body language and constant excessive batting of her eyes on the same repeated racial questions which I believe was a sign of lying. Every school she attended was a Private School, her family did not always live in the "Projects," she lived in middle class neighborhoods. She strays, she decides on her pesonal opinions and has shown that she is in fact, racist. Sonya Sotomayor, served on the National Council of La Raza from 1998 to 2004 - beginning her involvement one year after the president of Mexico stood before the group and declared that "...the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important part of it." Jose Angle Gutierrez, founder of the La Raza Unida Party, "We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him." She is nothing more than another Aztlan member. Senate claiming no public outrage on Sotomayor.

Either they are lying or people are giving up hope on this nation.

The hearings were a sick pandering joke, she did not answer one question without spinning and batting her eyes so fast that I thought she would take flight any second.

Her nervousness and untruthfulness showed in her body language and constant excessive batting of her eyes on the same repeated racial questions which I believe was a sign of lying.

Every school she attended was a Private School, her family did not always live in the “Projects,” she lived in middle class neighborhoods. She strays, she decides on her pesonal opinions and has shown that she is in fact, racist.

Sonya Sotomayor, served on the National Council of La Raza from 1998 to 2004 – beginning her involvement one year after the president of Mexico stood before the group and declared that “…the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important part of it.”

Jose Angle Gutierrez, founder of the La Raza Unida Party, “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

She is nothing more than another Aztlan member.

]]> By: Cathymac http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/comment-page-1/#comment-23996 Cathymac Fri, 29 May 2009 21:42:35 +0000 http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/#comment-23996 I gave up on Peggy long ago, she is member of the media elite and afraid she will not get invited to the next wine and cheese party at the NYT's exec's house. It's sad because she is a gifted writer. I gave up on Peggy long ago, she is member of the media elite and afraid she will not get invited to the next wine and cheese party at the NYT’s exec’s house. It’s sad because she is a gifted writer.

]]> By: Wolverine http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/comment-page-1/#comment-23992 Wolverine Fri, 29 May 2009 19:55:05 +0000 http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/#comment-23992 I'm gonna be sick. "Bumbling Bob" Gibbs is out there literally warning all of us to go easy on Sotomayor. Up pop those Republican paragons of courage Cornyn and Hatch to wag their fingers at Conservative critics of the Sotomayor nomination. And Peggy Noonan? Well, she appears to be ready to roll over and enjoy it. Honest to God, these people on the Hill and those who flout their past history as Republicans are pieces of work. Slap them in the face, and they recommend counterattacking with a feather. This country does so need a top-to-bottom cleaning, starting with that garbage pit on Capitol Hill. I’m gonna be sick. “Bumbling Bob” Gibbs is out there literally warning all of us to go easy on Sotomayor. Up pop those Republican paragons of courage Cornyn and Hatch to wag their fingers at Conservative critics of the Sotomayor nomination. And Peggy Noonan? Well, she appears to be ready to roll over and enjoy it. Honest to God, these people on the Hill and those who flout their past history as Republicans are pieces of work. Slap them in the face, and they recommend counterattacking with a feather. This country does so need a top-to-bottom cleaning, starting with that garbage pit on Capitol Hill.

]]> By: ACTivist http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/comment-page-1/#comment-23946 ACTivist Wed, 27 May 2009 22:26:21 +0000 http://novatownhall.com/2009/05/26/the-judicial-oath/#comment-23946 Jacob, Are you that naive my boy? The problem with ANY court is the possibility-nay, the PROBABILITY that ajudication will derive from the judges' activism (or fuzzy sense of feeling) is far greater than half. Our living Constitution tells us that we need to change with the times and that is the time honored duty of the court to determine where the Constitution is at any specific place, time or event. And when these laws are made from the bench and you have lost all cognizant sight of that bland, faded piece of parchment, you will begin to understand what it is to be a "world citizen". After all, the framers never intended this experiment to last as long as it did. They knew that apathy and liberal idiots would eventually screw it up. Voila! As a note: I find it very disturbing that I always hear about "..seperation of church and state.." with just about everything BUT I NEVER HEAR about seperation of branches and powers from those same individuals. This is how we disect and pick-and-choose those sections that "fit" our arguement. Only problem is that the Constitution is an all or nothing agreement. Jacob,

Are you that naive my boy? The problem with ANY court is the possibility-nay, the PROBABILITY that ajudication will derive from the judges’ activism (or fuzzy sense of feeling) is far greater than half. Our living Constitution tells us that we need to change with the times and that is the time honored duty of the court to determine where the Constitution is at any specific place, time or event. And when these laws are made from the bench and you have lost all cognizant sight of that bland, faded piece of parchment, you will begin to understand what it is to be a “world citizen”. After all, the framers never intended this experiment to last as long as it did. They knew that apathy and liberal idiots would eventually screw it up. Voila!

As a note: I find it very disturbing that I always hear about “..seperation of church and state..” with just about everything BUT I NEVER HEAR about seperation of branches and powers from those same individuals. This is how we disect and pick-and-choose those sections that “fit” our arguement. Only problem is that the Constitution is an all or nothing agreement.

]]>