74 Responses to “The Peter Principle Presidency”

1. Lovisa
   June 20th, 2009 @ 5:33 am

   Dr Krauthammer is a pompous rearend!

   Maybe we should call back Dicky and Rummy and get some action in Iran.

2. Jack
   June 20th, 2009 @ 8:54 am

   Sounds like a good plan to me. Let the people of Iran put Imaheadjob on the end of a rope, too.

3. zimzo
   June 20th, 2009 @ 10:09 am

   That crazy liberal Henry Kissinger thinks you’re wrong:

   “I think the president has handled this well. Anything that the United States says that puts us totally behind one of the contenders, behind Mousavi, would be a handicap for that person. And I think it’s the proper position to take that the people of Iran have to make that decision. Of course, we have to state our fundamental convictions of freedom of speech, free elections, and I don’t see how President Obama could say less than he has, and even that is considered intolerable meddling. He has, after all, carefully stayed away from saying things that seem to support one side or the other. And I think it was the right thing to do because public support for the opposition would only be used by the — by Ahmadinejad — if I can ever learn his name properly — against Mousavi.”
   http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/18/kissinger-obama-iran/

   And after you blindly enabled the worst President of our lifetimes (including Nixon and Carter) until he did what he said he was going to do all along on immigration, you don’t have much credibility when it comes to rating Presidents.

4. The Bulletproof Monk
   June 20th, 2009 @ 11:31 am

   “And after you blindly enabled the worst President of our lifetimes”

   Are you refering to the current “affirmative action” president? I’d submit to you that he’ll tie with Carter on that title, actually.

   Like so many failed mamagers in companies that were FORCED to promote minorities (despite the fact that those very minorities often could’nt spell, form a sentence, oand didn’t have degrees like their white counterparts), He got the job because of his color…not his personal resume. Had we seen the resumes without a picture attached, or race indicated…..we’d all have laughed the individual on that resume into oblivion.

5. Joe Budzinski
   June 20th, 2009 @ 12:32 pm

   You nailed it, Monk

6. dans
   June 20th, 2009 @ 2:24 pm

   Monk,

   His Sontomayer nomination seems to support your comment.

7. Wolverine
   June 20th, 2009 @ 6:26 pm

   Kissinger is right. Any signs of overt American support and Mousavi is a dead man…along with many of his supporters. Look, it is one thing to talk tough and make threats in a situation like this; but it is quite another to have the will and the capability to carry through on such threats. The enemy will call your bluff every time and leave you looking like a vacillating bumpkin — the “Paper Tiger” of the old China days.

   Just what does anyone suggest we do here? Iran is already being hit with sanctions because of the nuclear business. So, you try to tighten the UN and our own unilateral sanctions for an additional reason: internal political repression? Do you realize how many countries in the UN are headed by people with the same kind of political control over their people as that currently exercised by the Iranian government? Try to get these people to support action against a like dictatorial regime? Good luck — even with the Chinese.

   So, what’s left? We are already seriously stretched fighting two wars in the Middle East. We’ve got a tenuous mess in North Korea. We’ve still got an anti-terror war going on all over the globe. The war in Afghanistan is definitely not going well as it is(and Obama had better start waking up to that fact now instead of letting that war seemingly be shoved under the public rug and out of sight). Anyone seriously think we have the wherewithal right now to throw yet another dustup into the mix? Well, there are some who say we start throwing a few missiles into Iran. You must be kidding. That would probably end the opposition movement faster than anything, possibly even bring some of them back into the government fold through pure national patriotism. Moreover, even our “allies” would run as fast as they could in the other direction — all except our best ally, Israel, and maybe a few of the Eastern European republics who know first hand what political repression is.

   I don’t see a ready answer to all this. Covert action, I suppose — but I’ll bet that has already been in progress for quite awhile. Look, for almost 50 years now we have had a bastard only 90 miles off our shores who is every bit as bad as the Iranian government when it comes to political oppression. We tried once to take him out and blew it. He is still sitting there. We managed to take direct action over the decades in a few smaller places such as Granada and Panama, where the forces facing us were comparatively much weaker and much more disorganized. It just isn’t the same in Iran.

   These dissidents in Iran have to fashion their own counter-revolution. If a way can be found to give them covert support in a secure fashion, they will have to decide whether or not to take it and take the accompanying risks The mullahs (the real power in Iran) will have to look for ways to allow some dissent without losing their basic control over the place. That’s a start. That’s the wood worm starting to gnaw at the innards. You take it from there. This could be a long, slow process.

   The one thing that changes this entire equation is if the Iranian authorities do start massive retaliations against the dissidents. Then you’ve got a very visible humanitarian problem. Then the rest of the world cannot just turn away and ignore it. The you re-examine all your options at a point when you are on steadier ground. Do Kosovo and Bosnia come to mind?

8. Wolverine
   June 20th, 2009 @ 6:36 pm

   Thats “Grenada”, not “Granada.” Wouldn’t want to get our Spanish friends upset!

9. zimzo
   June 20th, 2009 @ 7:12 pm

   Monk, Joe and dans it really is all about race for you guys. You just can’t get over the fact that the President is black. Bush gets into Yale through a legacy admission and proves time and time again that he is intellectually vacant and incompetent, but that kind of affirmative action is OK with you guys. But when a black person or a Latino person is successful you immediately accuse him or her of being undeserving of that success. It’s one thing to disagree with the President on policy, but bringing race into it is really beyond the pale. You guys have shown your true colors, so to speak.

   And it’s really rich that you guys suddenly want all the votes counted in an election after the debacle of 2000.

10. zimzo
    June 20th, 2009 @ 7:15 pm

    And this “sentence” is especially ironic considering the bad spelling and grammar: “Like so many failed mamagers in companies that were FORCED to promote minorities (despite the fact that those very minorities often could’nt spell, form a sentence, oand didn’t have degrees like their white counterparts), He got the job because of his color…not his personal resume.

11. Joe Budzinski
    June 20th, 2009 @ 7:37 pm

    Bush made a lot of mistakes, but Obama is incompetence exemplified. He can’t form a coherent sentence that has not been scripted for him. But it is amusing that you are forced to defend him, it is more delicious with each passing day, Zimzo,

    Wolv, they are sending explosive devices into Iraq. We should be returning the favor.

12. Joe Budzinski
    June 20th, 2009 @ 7:40 pm

    Oh, and speaking of incompetence, over-his-head, Hudsucker Proxy, etc:

    http://ace.mu.nu/archives/288810.php

    Imagine if Bush had done this, indeed.

13. zimzo
    June 20th, 2009 @ 7:50 pm

    You can rant all you want about Obama, Joe, and go right ahead comparing him with Bush, which only makes you look bad since you defended Bush’s incompetence for so long.

    But you ignored my main point, which is why did you write “You nailed it, Monk” after he brought up Obama’s race. What does race race have to do with it, Joe?

14. Kevin
    June 20th, 2009 @ 7:55 pm

    Joe, on #12 (and the others, really) are you serious?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3p9y_OEAdc

    If Obama sneezes will you complain about that too?

    Actually, if you are representative of the opposition then by all means, continue on. . .

15. Lovisa
    June 20th, 2009 @ 9:06 pm

    Wish more fathers would take their kids out for ice cream!

    Joe, what do you suggest the President should have been doing had he NOT gone out with his daughters?

    IMO, those idiots on Ace of Spades sound like a bunch of half drunk college kids with entirely too much time on their hands. Bet none of them has kids.

    Dad’s ice cream adventure endangers the revolution in Iran? Give me a break!

16. Wolverine
    June 20th, 2009 @ 9:20 pm

    Uh, Joe, this is June 2009. The guy in the Oval Office is named Obama. This is the guy who has apologized all over the place for the past “sins” of America. This is a guy who is closing Gitmo because he said it hurts our image abroad. This is a guy who released memos by former Justice Dept. lawyers addressing the constitutionality of harsh interrogations of captured enemy combattants and terrorists and who, for awhile, let hints circulate that these lawyers might be charged with crimes. This is a guy who wants to make sure we are not seen treating captured terrorists unnecessarily harshly and in some self-proclaimed violation of the Geneva Conventions.

    Can you imagine this being a guy who would authorize the passage of explosive devices to dissidents in Iran? Explosive devices are used to kill people and often wind up killing the innocent along with the guilty. Clandestine users of explosive devices may be called “patriots” by some, e.g. the French Resistance, but “terrorists” by others. The Israeli fighters, for example, while trying desperately to create the conditions for a Jewish state, have never really lived down their bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.

    Either way, you will never see the proposal you advocate in a million years from this particular guy. He’s already got enough problems in Pakistan and Afghanistan when a drone missile or air strike takes out a whole group of al-Qaida and Taliban types and results in some civilian collateral damage. Not in a million years, Joe. Not in a million years….unless we actually go to war against Iran.

17. Joe Budzinski
    June 20th, 2009 @ 9:40 pm

    It’s quite simple, Zimzo: You voted for him because of what he represents, not because of any demonstrated ability, achievements or credentials indicating he could be a competent president. Now that your mistake is becoming evident, you can only run from it for so long.

18. Joe Budzinski
    June 20th, 2009 @ 10:30 pm

    Wolve, of course you are right. But clandestinely arming the protesters is still what we SHOULD be doing.

19. dans
    June 20th, 2009 @ 10:43 pm

    “Monk, Joe and dans it really is all about race for you guys. ”

    zimzo,

    Regardless of any of your hallucinations, it is all about competency. As joe states, your guy is an incompetent twit, many who supported him are beginning to realize that.

    Reality check zimzo, many such as yourself will support him only as long as it is deemed the fashionable thing to do.

    Monk’s post was all about affirmative action, and the reverse discrimination that it brings to the table. You sure do bring up race quite frequently, and I certainly hope your talking about it here helps you deal with your apparent deep issues with this topic. Don’t believe me ? read the posts above again..

    Monk, joe and dans didn’t bring up Obama’s race, you did…

20. Had Enough
    June 20th, 2009 @ 11:13 pm

    “The guy in the Oval Office is named Obama.”

    Sorry, but it appears that he is Barry Soetoro, but he has sealed and refused the release of any documents to the contrary. Additionally, it appears that Barry Soetoro is an Illegal Alien.

    “And what do they hear from the president of the United States? Silence. Then, worse. Three days in, the president makes clear his policy: continued “dialogue” with their clerical masters. …”

    Hmm, dialogue will deprive him of more bows and maybe an award of gold.

    “In what sense is Obama not a lightweight?”

    He is a master manipulator and big time Chicago B*llshitter with a loyal criminal thuggery following, but he uh, stumbles uh, without his teleprompter.

    The secret service told him that he had to scrap the blueberry, he almost had a heart attack, he refused, he said that he could not under any circumstances give it up. I presume he uses the blueberry for communications that he is leery of making inside the white house.

    Several groups have requested copies of the guest lists since he has been in the white house, he refuses to release that information also. I suspect Wright has not been in the white house since he made a statement recently that the Jews were keeping him away from the Usurper.

    From what I have read this week, most Middle Easterners believe that he is a Palestinian sympathizer and a Muslim so I suspect that he will not openly say or do anything that would upset the Khamenei regime.

21. Joe Budzinski
    June 21st, 2009 @ 12:51 am

    Dan, yes, Zimzo has manifested some personal “issues” with regard to race and ethnicity here over the years. While it is not surprising that someone residing in an abandoned missile silo in Nebraska would present an insular worldview, we have been working to broaden his vision and attempt to welcome him into the 21st century and the modern, multicultural, color-blind environment that most Americans live in.

22. The Bulletproof Monk
    June 21st, 2009 @ 9:57 am

    Zipperhead…where did you learn to reason? Why do you have to look over blatant sections of text that disprove your every thought? And lastly, why must you pick up on bad keystrokes that happened in the course of an 80 word per minute typing fury…when it appears that you, yourself, can’t quite move your fingers that fast. I’ll guarantee that my vocabulary and my intellect is quite a bit higher than most here.
    I am, like most, prone to mistakes at that rate of speed. It was cheap of you to fixate on that part of the post, because you obviously didn’t have any other ammo.

    “You just can’t get over the fact that the President is black.”
    I know it’s fast and in your mind, gets you a fast “point”, but I actually said “Had we seen the resumes without a picture attached, OR RACE INDICATED” which told everybody else here – with a brain- that I prefer that the most capable person on paper (with the most documentable experience) is who I’d prefer…regardless of race.

    It was at that point that you pulled the race card out of your ass and attempted to toss it on the table. Quit being a dickhead, and join in on a meaningful discussion. This isn’t KOS or Huffington Post. We deal in “real” issues here.

23. zimzo
    June 21st, 2009 @ 11:36 am

    Once again, Joe, I ask you: Why did you say “You nailed it, Monk” when he called Obama the ““affirmative action” president, referred to “minorities” who “could’nt [sic] spell, form a sentence, oand [sic] didn’t have degrees like their white counterparts” and claimed “He got the job because of his color”?

    Why did you think injecting race into a discussion of his policies was relevant, Joe? Is it because you are ashamed and embarrassed by your agreement with Monk’s race-baiting, that you now try to avoid answering the question now?

24. Jack
    June 21st, 2009 @ 12:12 pm

    That’s the left for you — tell the truth, and you’re a racist and race baiter.

25. zimzo
    June 21st, 2009 @ 1:51 pm

    Well maybe you can explain, Jack, why Obama’s race is relevant to his competence as president. Monk is the one who brought it up, not me.

26. Joe Budzinski
    June 21st, 2009 @ 2:26 pm

    Zimzo’s shameful past may not be familiar ground for all of our readers so I will give you a peek here

    http://novatownhall.com/2007/12/19/no-trespassing/#comment-435

    This is how the man thinks, so no wonder he leaps at any opportunity to try and introduce race into any debate.

27. Joe Budzinski
    June 21st, 2009 @ 3:23 pm

    OK here is a question:

    How many instances does Obama get to be AWOL on a major international crisis before everyone figures out he is an empty suit?

    He is frankly looking worse than “dipshit” on Iran because the “dipshit” is the guy you don’t mind having at the party even though he is sort of retarded – because he is harmless.

    Obama, by dodging responsibility during certain events is by no means harmless but complicit if he does not react correctly. This applies both to the sad sap people of Iran who might have thought they had an ally in the U.S., and also whoever ends up under the shadow of the North Korean missile launch in a couple weeks.

    The world is bearing down on our Chauncey the Gardner, is it not?

28. The Bulletproof Monk
    June 21st, 2009 @ 5:15 pm

    zipperhead…his race had nothing to do with his inability to preside. His empty Resume does.
    Got it, dumbass?
    He has run one campaign for election–his. He has written two pieces of fiction—his. And he had served less than a year total in any capacity of office, and much less than that , if you count significant input beyond voting “present”.

29. Marjorie
    June 21st, 2009 @ 5:21 pm

    Zimzo,

    It would be great if you stopped using race as an issue. Start using a person ability or non ability in doing a job for your comments.

    After a while it just appears that all you focus on is race in issues when you’ve no where else to go on topic.

    Think you can do that?

30. Kevin
    June 21st, 2009 @ 6:59 pm

    I have to admit, I’m not that bright. In fact, I’m more stupid than most.

    That’s why I need help understanding why everyone is jumping down zimzo’s throat for bringing up race when it was Bullet-less Monk who started it by saying:

    “He got the job because of his color…not his personal resume.”

    And why then dans seems to have completely lost his/her mind when she/he writes in #19:

    “Monk, joe and dans didn’t bring up Obama’s race, you did. . .”

    I mean, really, who the fu*k is this “dans” character when she/he refers to him/herself in the third? And then to state such an seemingly obvious falsehood!

    Well, maybe it’s all relative to whichever of you goons proclaims to be “dans”; all shades of falsehood are as easily painted, possibly.

    Kevin’s stupid brain is truly failing him.

31. Had Enough
    June 21st, 2009 @ 8:03 pm

    I would have been happier with Morgan Freeman as president, he can play the part better.

32. dans
    June 21st, 2009 @ 8:46 pm

    Sober up Kevin.. the brain damage you are doing is becoming very obvious..

33. zimzo
    June 21st, 2009 @ 8:56 pm

    Wow, Joe, once again you dishonestly try to use my obvious parody of this comment, which you made in an attempt to libel me:

    http://novatownhall.com/2007/12/15/joey-ventos-day-in-court/#comment-310

    Are you truly unable to have an honest discussion without resorting to such underhanded tactics? Do you think people can’t read the rest of the thread, as Kevin did, and see how this discussion began and see your repeated attempts to evade the question of why you think invoking Obama’s race was appropriate and relevant? And to think I actually looked up to you once upon a time as an intellectual mentor. It’s very painful to me to see what you have become.

34. Had Enough
    June 21st, 2009 @ 9:50 pm

    According to Michael Steele, the Usurping Mulatto Dipshit was elected because of his color:

    “Michael Steele said this on a radio talk show a few weeks ago:

    “The problem that we have with this president is that we don’t know him,” he said. “He was not vetted, folks. … He was not vetted, because the press fell in love with the black man running for the office. ‘Oh gee, wouldn’t it be neat to do that? Gee, wouldn’t it make all of our liberal guilt just go away? We can continue to ride around in our limousines and feel so lucky to live in an America with a black president.’ Okay that’s wonderful, great scenario, nice backdrop. But what does he stand for? What does he believe?… So we don’t know. We just don’t know…”

35. Lovisa
    June 21st, 2009 @ 9:58 pm

    Zimzo-

    Remember the old saying: “once upon a time never comes again”.

    Sounds to me as if Joe is foaming at the mouth thinking and maybe hoping that our President will fail in all his endeavours.

    Low approval rating for Obama means, perhaps, lower standing for America in other countries. Somehow Joe rejoices at the low approval rating. What’s good about it, I ask?

36. Had Enough
    June 21st, 2009 @ 10:10 pm

    “Low approval rating for Obama means, perhaps, lower standing for America in other countries. Somehow Joe rejoices at the low approval rating. What’s good about it, I ask?”

    Main reason and objective for his failure = We Stay A Sovereign Country.

    As people begin to wake up and realize that the Usurper’s goals are to reform this nation into a Alinsky Socialist Society or worse, the better off we are.

    Even his records as a state senator are missing, lost, unaccounted for, along with everything else.

37. Lovisa
    June 21st, 2009 @ 10:11 pm

    Had Enough

    Surely you can come up with something a little bit lower and baser than

    “USURPING MULATTO DIPSHIT”.

    I hope to god that you do not have children who hear your filthy language.

    As for Michael Steele talking about getting a job because of race… Well, well, well..

38. Wolverine
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 12:56 am

    Is this true? Joe was once an “intellectual mentor” for Zimzo? Boy, there are some deep, dark things in the past which suddenly pop out of nowhere!! Who would have thought….

39. Jack
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 8:53 am

    That explains it!

    Zimzo: “The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now I am the master.”

    Joe: “Only a master of evil, Zimzo.”

40. squiddy
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 9:44 am

    “Low approval rating for Obama means, perhaps, lower standing for America in other countries.”

    Perhaps, perhaps not. It’s irrelevant, anyway.

    As Obama himself has said, he’s not President of the World, he’s the President of the United States of America; he answers to us, and us alone. I’d rather a President with a 90% US approval rating and a 10% approval rating abroad than vice-versa.

    Besides, America’s standing in the world is very often an inverse function, anyway. They like us most when we’re suffering, and hate us most when they need us most. The world would *love* us if we were on our knees…

41. Joe Budzinski
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 10:43 am

    Ah, liberal guilt, it is an exquisitely delicious thing. Zimzo, I apologize for rubbing salt in that old wound of yours, but sometimes I just cannot help myself.

42. jacob
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 11:48 am

    Zimzo: “The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now I am the master.”

    Joe: “Only a master of evil, Zimzo.”

    now comes the scene wherre zimzo claims to be Jacks father — oh the humanity

43. Jack
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 12:28 pm

    Jack screams, “Nooooooo!” and takes a header off the catwalk.

44. dans
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 4:33 pm

    “Low approval rating for Obama means, perhaps, lower standing for America in other countries. ”

    I submit that now that Europe has seen the fallacy of their left-leaning ways reflected back to them in an American mirror, they do not like what they see :

    BRUSSELS – Center-right parties hailed European Parliament election victories as a continent-wide vote against stimulus spending and corporate bailouts and pledged Monday to forge ahead with conservative solutions to the economic crisis.

    Right-leaning governments came out ahead in Germany, France, Italy and Belgium, while conservative opposition parties won in Britain, Spain, and Bulgaria. Far-right groups also made gains in Britain, Austria, the Netherlands and Hungary.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31150126/

    Glad someone is smelling the coffee, is this a looking glass into our 2010 elections I wonder…

45. Wolverine
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:04 pm

    Excellent point in #44, Dans. Who knows? This might convince me to agree with previous implications from Obama that we all should strive to imitate our European allies. Do you think?

46. Right Wing Kamikaze
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:40 pm

    I don’t think it’s the Europeans seeing the fallacy of what they’re doing by observing the consequences in America when all they have to do is see the consequences in their own homelands, which have stagnant economies and high unemployment.

    This is part of a growing wave in Europe that started with the election of Sarkozy in 2007 and Merkel in 2005.

47. dans
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:44 pm

    Wolv,

    My only interest in the other side of the pond was Briggite Bardot..

48. Lovisa
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

    Wolverine -

    dans has a globe with only the United States on it!

49. dans
    June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:59 pm

    Actually not Lovisa, but on my globe, unlike yours, the United States is always facing up…

50. mindy
    July 19th, 2009 @ 7:59 pm

    obama worked so hard to get the job of president but he must not have really wanted the position once people wanted him to sit behind his desk and get to work…after all there are millions of americans out of work; we are broke; americans DO NOT want the energy and health reform bills jammed down our throats (been there, done that with the stimulus bill); but all obama does is get on the plane; get on television and make his useless speeches..i say impeach the guy!

51. Right Wing Kamikaze
    July 19th, 2009 @ 8:11 pm

    Good idea Mindy. If someone provides the chubby intern, I’ll provide the cigars.

52. Lovisa
    July 19th, 2009 @ 10:41 pm

    mindy sure is spunky tonight.

    Before an impeachment can take place, there must be a very, very, very good reason. I don’t believe he has committed any impeachable act. Not yet, anyway.

    Furthermore, should he be impeached, we’d end up with President Biden!!!!! Don’t forget that Vice President Ford took over after Nixon. Something to think about.

53. Wolverine
    July 20th, 2009 @ 3:47 am

    Biden?!!!! Oh,noooooo!!! Is there some way under the Constitution that we could impeach them both simultaneously? Oh, my gosh, does that mean Pelosi…..???!!! Boy, are we in a pickle with this leadership. It would probably take about 50 or 60 straight impeachments before we got somewhere on this!

54. Jack
    July 20th, 2009 @ 8:49 am

    On the bright side, if Biden were President, Congress would probably never even vote on his proposals, because they would not be able to stop laughing.

55. Lovisa
    July 20th, 2009 @ 9:44 am

    Well,Wolve, you know the domino theory! Remove ONE tile and ….

56. Had Enough
    July 20th, 2009 @ 2:22 pm

    When the Usurper is found to be a Interloper, the election would be void, every member of his administration and his appointments, every bill he signed, every order, etc. would be void.

    A temporary president would be placed and a new election would take place within months.

    You can’t impeach the Usurper who was never legally president.

57. Lovisa
    July 20th, 2009 @ 3:00 pm

    HE

    When are you going to wake up from your dream and face reality?

    You must be in cahoots with that guy who signed on to go to Iraq, and a few months later, when he ACTUALLY was going to be shipped out to face the reality of war, he refused, saying that Obama is not a bona fide president, consequently cannot be Commander in Chief. What a put-on!!

    “You can’t impeach the U. who was never legally president.” So – what do you do with him, pray tell?

58. Lovisa
    July 20th, 2009 @ 3:02 pm

    TEMPORARY PRESIDENT????????????

    If you find anything in our Constitution about that subject, please let me know.

59. Wolverine
    July 20th, 2009 @ 3:44 pm

    Actually, I think we may have a bit of a legal problem here. Obama appears not to have a birth certificate. Just how do you impeach someone who does not officially exist?!!!

60. Wolverine
    July 20th, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

    Darn, I never did believe that old 1950’s story about Roswell, New Mexico;but, doggone, if any of that was …. Nah!! Any guy like that would be a lot smarter.

61. jacob
    July 20th, 2009 @ 4:11 pm

    Lovisa,
    read the constitution you will find the answer there.

62. Had Enough
    July 20th, 2009 @ 5:02 pm

    Lowvisa, “that guy,” has a distinguished career as a soldier and since has been a reservist who also worked for a military contractor. The Major was questioning the Usurpers validity.

    He had no problem with going back to Iraq he was ready to go, he had a problem with taking orders from the Usurper who will not to this day prove who he is. If the Interloper had produced a few documents, Cook would have gladly been on a plane to Iraq.

    The day before this case was to be heard, the government, military top commanders included, REVOKED his orders to go to Iraq RATHER than have the Usurper release and produce his papers to prove that he is eligible to give orders to our military.

    The judge made a statement that the bHo should turn over all of the documents requested or resign.

    I believe it was the next day that the Major Cook’s employer, a defense contractor let him go, refused him severance pay or accrued leave, etc. His boss said that the government was pressuring him to fire him, that things have gone crazy and the government was in the process of revoking his security clearances. The military did not discharge him as has been reported.

    The government is ruining the lives and careers of citizens who question the eligibility of the Master Manipulator who is the only person to hold a public office and refuses to release any documents what-so-ever pertaining to his life or eligibility.

    The Usurper also on the day after the inauguration 1-21-09, issued an executive order that prevents the government from releasing such information about a government official, I had the # but can’t locate it. Why on his 1st full day in the white house would he sign an order which had to have been prepared in advance pertaining to his privacy? It should be Illegal to write an order to protect yourself.

    A General and Lt. Colonel have now joined him in further litigation, there are also approx 200 soldiers that have agreed to be included. A class action suit is possible.

    There is so much more, numerous social security numbers and addresses, a number of names used, etc. it is something new everyday and he refuses and continues to fight in the courts.

    It is sad that you trust this stranger who came out of no where with your life.

63. The Bulletproof Monk
    July 20th, 2009 @ 10:40 pm

    http://thebulletproofmonk.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-developments-in-birthcertificategat.html

64. Lovisa
    July 21st, 2009 @ 1:18 am

    I don’t care how distinguished a career Cook has had. Fact is this: If Cook believed he couldn’t serve with Obama as CIC, he had the option of not volunteering. To volunteer means that you are doing something of your own free will, doesn’t it?

    You don’t believe, do you, that Cook all of a sudden came to the conclusion that Obama couldn’t be CIC? All his actions have taken place since May of this year. Cook was not drafted – he VOLUNTEERED. Why?

65. Had Enough
    July 21st, 2009 @ 3:11 am

    When or if he volunteered to go to Iraq or when he became aware of the eligibility issue is moot, I don’t have any information on the events that occurred and don’t care.

    The point is that the government had nothing to offer the judge to show evidence or support any claim of the Usurper’s eligibility, so they rescinded his orders the afternoon before the hearing to end the case scheduled the next morning…..but, it’s not over as they believed.

    They revoked Cook’s orders rather than produce any documents, since then the government has done everything they can to purposely ruin the man’s life and career.

    I do know that a General and Lt. Colonel have since joined him in any legal actions that he will take. There are well over a hundred active duty and retired military that are in current and future filings against bHo.

    It was not the judge in this case that said bHo should produce his documents or resign, it was the judge in a case brought by Alan Keyes that will be heard in the near future.

    All I can gather from your posts is that you think it is fine for the government to retaliate against Cook and ruin his life for requesting proof that the Interloper in the white house behind his orders has the authority to do so.

    Until proven otherwise, bHo has no authority to even clean the toilets at 1600 Penna Ave. He never joined any committee that required a security clearance or background check of any kind, I wonder why, was it the same reasons that he refuses to this day to release any information?

    To date he has been handed the most sensitive, top secret information concerning this country and people like you don’t give a damn that someone who basically didn’t exist until 20 years has access to that information while he is bankrupting the country and trying to shut us up.

    He also refuses to release any information or lists of visitors to the white house since 1-20-09.

    Every effort to vet him over the past several years since he ran for the senate was halted by people like you screaming racist and bigot, it is a legal issue, not a race issue. When Michael Steele announced that bHo was never vetted it was ignored completely by the media, the same old crap when it comes to the dipshit.

    By the way, has anyone heard of Vera Baker? the story never got picked up by the mainstream media. NBC did a special that stated bHo and his partner in crime were not getting along at that time and they were growing apart, wonder why.

    Gee shortly after he became a senator, his partner in crime got a raise at the hospital where she worked in a position that had no job description and the position was totally eliminated after she left, her salary was raised from approximately $50,000. to well over $300,000. a year.

    http://seanhannityfox.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-affair-vera-baker-found-exiled-to.html

66. Joe Budzinski
    July 21st, 2009 @ 4:17 am

    that’s a good post, Monk, I’ll make it a point to link to it when I get to do another Obama post

67. Lovisa
    July 21st, 2009 @ 11:45 am

    HE

    The only thing you should gather from my post is the fact that Cook VOLUNTEERED> He was not forced to sign up for Afghanistan. I believe it was done with much planning and very much for the purpose of getting into the news and to smear the President.

    FYI – The words “racist” and “bigot” are not part of my vocabulary /”people like you screaming….”/

68. Lovisa
    July 21st, 2009 @ 11:50 am

    Joe

    The Sean Hennity spot show was made by WHITE PRIDE. The words “WHITE NOW” appear on every frame.

    Futhermore, there are NO facts anywhere.

    You consider that a good post? You surprise me!

69. Jack
    July 21st, 2009 @ 12:29 pm

    That’s what we call an ad hominem argument: the other side is racist, so their arguments may be dismissed out of hand.

    But that is just not a valid argument.

70. Had Enough
    July 21st, 2009 @ 2:29 pm

    “Futhermore, there are NO facts anywhere.”

    EXACTLY, there are no facts, evidence or documents ANYWHERE pertaining to ANYTHING, there may not even be anything in the locations where he had anything and everything with his named sealed!

    I’ve never seen Hannity, I refuse to pay for TV in any form, I grabbed the 1st in my search of her name, Vera Baker. Whether it was on Hannity or not or who provided the spot doesn”t matter, the fact is that her name and her involvement with bHo were all over the internet and otherwise, of course mainstream media excluded as usual. It has been reported that he was paying for 2 campaign financial managers, while admitting and documenting 1 on his reports and that wasn’t Vera.

    Maybe you would prefer to discuss bHo and Larry Sinclair who kept getting his website shut down by Google. He claims to have had sex and snorted cocaine with bHo on several occasions in a car.

    After Donald Young who was the choir director at bHo and Wright’s church contacted Sinclair he was murdered. The witness in the state department passport case was also murdered in front of a church in NE DC in April 2008.

    Kinda reminds me of the Clinton years.

    I don’t have time to continue to respond to your frivolous remarks when anything is said about the Usurper, Fraud, Impostor, Interloper. You should be more concerned who is actually behind him and why.

    Maybe you should listen to Rev Wright, he said referring to bHo, “He ain’t Jesus Christ, he’s a politician and he does what politicians do.”

    It may be too late when you realize that he Ain’t Jesus Christ, that he is nothing more than a Chicago gangster, thug, mobster, manipulating liar who is a puppet for unknown concerns.

    I wonder if he smokes a little “blow” now and then now that he has more money. Money was the only reason he didn’t smoke it more in the past.

71. Kevin
    July 21st, 2009 @ 2:41 pm

    I know I’m kinda thick headed. That’s why I need someone to help me understand why Sean Hannity is calling anyone “retard” and signing his posts “White Pride”??

    It’s weird, I don’t get it??

72. Lovisa
    July 21st, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

    HE

    YOU are the one who referred to Hannity in #55. I wouldn’t pay to watch him either.

73. dans
    July 21st, 2009 @ 3:28 pm

    Ya mean why someone masquerading as Hannity is signing these posts ?

    If someone created a barryobama.blogspot.com and confessed that he was born in Kenya, would you believe it ?

74. Kevin
    July 21st, 2009 @ 7:47 pm

    I don’t know which way is up, dans, or which way is down; I just know the link was presented as credible so I took it on face value. If you’re saying it’s not then someone should probably clear that up!!

    HE, are there any other sources of information that might not be credible? Also, if you can continue to post links to white supremacist sites, that would be great, that way Joe won’t have to (though it looks like he’s interested in this Hannity one )

Leave a Reply