I don’t know if the latest egg-on-chin incident involving a bunch of liberal moron pantywaist (sorry for the slew of redundancies) bloggers and journalists is a pwning as such, or simply a matter of Sarah Palin causing yet another multicar pileup on the other side just by continuing to exist. I tend to think the latter.
I think every time Sarah Palin’s heart beats a liberal, somewhere, dies. Thus they must remain vigilant, perpetually at war, and insane.
For the full story on the latest Palin-induced liberal meltdown, visit the hardest working blogger in the DC area, here, here and here. For a window into the liberal moron soul, take a peek here and here.
You think Todd would give up the secure millions his wife is bound to be making in the near future? No way, Jose!
Hmm, Todd Palin as someone who does not fend for himself. Interesting theory.
What do you mean by “fend for himself”?
Earn a living. Ever tried it?
Yea, I have tried it; managed OK.
I don’t know how much Mr. Palin earns on the oil slopes in Alaska (believe he has seasonal jobs), but I’m sure Sarah’s future income will be considerably higher.
She probably thanks the liberals for jumping that shark every morning and setting her free to do it.
Had they left well enough alone, I suspect she’d have been content to finish out an uneventful term….until they started throwing those bogus charges and causing the spending of hundreds of thousands of Alaskan resource dollars to defend against the crap.
You really belive that woman would have been content to “finish out an uneventful term..”? Bleeh. “The spending of hundreds of thousands of Alaskan resource dollars…”
Alaska is getting more money from the government than any other state, per capita.
Mrs Palin got a taste of the good life and adoring crowds and she ain’t goin’ to sit still in the metropolis of Wasilla. (I’ve been there)
Spending time in lively Juneau is
b o r i n g. She didn’t even want to live there while she was governor but decided to get per diem for living at home – in Wasilla.
Testy, testy, Lovisa. That speech at last year’s Convention still has you smarting, I see.
Joe
I don’t know what the convention speech has anything to do with what I wrote. Her speech was terrific and the response incredible and well deserved. (It didn’t smart me at all.)
That’s why I ask “would she be willing to finish up an uneventful term as governor of Alaska.
“How ya gonna keep’em down on the farm after they’ve seen Paree”
“Alaska is getting more money from the government than any other state, per capita.”
Did you read that in a fortune cookie Lovisa ?
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html
Guess now that Obama has gotten us out of Iraq, closed the deficit, created millions of new jobs, and closed Gitmo the liberals can focus on hating Republicans again..
Your links take me to Alabama. How do I get to Alaska?
Why do you use the word “hating”?
Maybe there are liberals who “hate” republicans. I like my republican friends. I just don’t agree with them most of the time but we can be civil to each other and there’s definitely no HATE involved.
Please cool it, dans!
“Alaska is getting more money from the government than any other state, per capita.”
So that makes it okie-dokie to blow it paying for a legal defense against bogus claim after bogus claim??
That is taking state funds and forcing them to be spent in ways they need not be spent. The dumb democrat witch hunt is actually hurting the citizens of Alaska more than it ever touched Palin. But, wisely, she decided that if she was the lightning rod for all the activity–she’d end the stupidity for them.
Well, Bully, how do we know it’s a witch hunt?
Like Andrew Sullivan says: Show us the document, Mrs. Ex-governor
You know, Mrs Palin brought this on herself!
If she had realized that she was in no way qualified to be vice president she could have stayed in Alaska, done her job as governor, gone fishing and hunting to her hearts’ content, kept her family out of the terrible MSM. Levy Johnson wouln’t have been on TV dissing his baby’s grandma, but no, the lure of the cheering crowds and bright lights were too tempting. (I’d have done the same thing – hehehe – in a heartbeat)
Lovisa, Well I guess I was just assuming you were one of the irrationally angry ones. If you have reasoned critiques of Ms. Palin I suppose I won’t hold that against you.
If consider Ms. Palin to be above reproach, I hope you won’t hold that against me.
Lovisa, There is a scroll bar on the right on those pages.
My apologies if I misinterpreted blind, unrelenting and irrational anger, as hate.
Joe, Dan, BM,
The girl is defensive it appears. One can only guess why. It is similar to the symptons I am seeing in Kevin who has of late been tarring all conservatives with a broad brush. zimzo is even more of a dope than ever.
This is all the second phase of BDS. For some is it becoming PDS. Its symptoms are characterized by a fevered and manic approach to political discourse. Hyper defensiveness of the messiah. This far wors than the illogic of years gone by.
jacob
Who is the “girl” you’re talking about?
Explanation: BDS?
PDS?
BTW, I wonder how Bully feels about being abbreviated to BM?
And dans, “blind, unrelenting and irrational anger …” ???????? That is something I reserve for guys like Cheney (6 deferments during the Vietnam war), Rummy, Wolfowitz, and Carl Rove, not Palin. Actually, I feel sorry for her, because I feel she was USED.
Bill Kristol is another guy I can feel angry at. I know looks shouldn’t mean much, but Kristol’s insipid grin makes me want to sock him in the breadbasket; he’s a marshmallow.
However, J. Gordon Liddy is at the top of my list.
It’s G. Gordon Liddy. The G is for George.
Lovisa,
“Actually, I feel sorry for her, because I feel she was USED.”
You have a very different way of expressing sympathy…
“Well, Bully, how do we know it’s a witch hunt?”
A little reading comprehension, please. Not one charge has stuck from these “ethic” complaints.
“Like Andrew Sullivan says: Show us the document, Mrs. Ex-governor”
What document would you like to see?
“You know, Mrs Palin brought this on herself!
If she had realized that she was in no way qualified to be vice president she could have stayed in Alaska, done her job as governor, gone fishing and hunting to her hearts’ content, kept her family out of the terrible MSM.”
Uh…she was more qualified than the current occupant on the President’s office. This boy is so far over his head, it’s almost comical..until we realize that this shit is irreversible, and we’re pretty much stuck with this crap from here on in, if he’s successful.
Palin had run a State with a National Guard (that had a higher profile than other states because of it’s proximity to a former enemy state), oversaw the responsibilities for 166,000 State employees and an $$11 Billion budget.
What did Obama have to stack against that, again? I never heard a successful answer for that the first time around.
Aside from all the other stuff
Who is Andrew Sullivan?
The Obama thorn-in-side pummeling begins.
He’s got three and a half more years of this, folks. She’ll become a household name…and will hold him accountable thruout his term…up close and personal. Come elections, she’ll be the watchdog that America was most familiar with.
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2009/07/palin-comes-out-swinging-in-wapo-oped.html
Monk,
“The Obama thorn-in-side pummeling begins.
He’s got three and a half more years of this”
Yes it will, and I for one do not believe the Golden One has the fortitude to weather the storm.
O.K., Lovisa. Andrew Sullivan seems to be ensconced near the top of the pantheon of the gods of the blogging world. The Atlantic Online is his showpiece. British-born, Oxford and Ivy League-trained, former writer for the New Republic, one of the first significant journalists to transfer his writing efforts in a big way to the blogs.
Don’t be embarrassed. I had to look it up also. The results actually made me burst out laughing. When the guy still lived in the U.K., his residence was in East Grinsted in Surrey. Do I remember East Grinsted. I stayed there once during a business and pleasure trip to the U.K. When I called the U.S. Embassy about something or other, the person on the other end of the line began laughing; and the laughter appeared to rebound throughout that embassy office. It seems that, at that time during the 1970’s, East Grinsted was the town depicted in a Brit soap opera or TV series or something and had become the Brit equivalent of Peyton Place. Boy, did I get a ribbing about my choice of accommodations! You’d have thought I had a room in a bordello!
Thanks, Wolve, and what a great story!
I was telling a German neighbor about a friend of mine who lives in Buxtehude, Germany, and she burst out laughing. Seems that Buxtehude to a German is equivalent to Timbuktu!
Lessons in geography —-
Other important points on Andrew Sullivan – he is gay and proclaimed to be a Republican for many years. When he got embraced by the MSM he became increasingly “progressive” aka liberal.
Occasionally he says something lucid, and I think if fame had never hit him he’d be more mainstream. But alas, with the cocktail circuit and cable shows calling he has fallen into the trap of being a progressive, gay man that is a supporter of President Obama’s – although periodically he throws a curve ball out there to remain relevant. I’d say there are millions like him, so nothing special really.
Excuse me, Cmac, but has it to do with anything that the man is gay? “Other important points…” Important? How?
…but *what* has it….
Lovisa, At one time Sullivan was a well known as a “gay republican” so, yes, it is pertinent to know the man. He claims to have voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004 but has been on a liberal slide for the past 5 years. At one time I enjoyed reading him, but as he became more famous be became more liberal.
I could care less that he is gay but it is one of the reasons, aside from some good writing (early in his career) that first got him into the limelight, that he is a famous as he is today.
“Cmac, but has it to do with anything that the man is gay”
Very good question, many gays seem to wear this on their sleeve.
Sorry, Cmac, but your theory about Sullivan becoming progressive because he became famous is wrong. Sullivan has been well-known since he became editor of The New Republic at age 29 in 1991. he was openly gay when he became editor of the New Republic and often wrote about gay issues. When he became HIV positive he write about that as well.
He initially supported Clinton, then turned against him. He was a vociferous supporter of Bush and of the War in Iraq, then changed his mind when he realized Bush lied to get us into the war in Iraq and tortured terrorist suspects. He has been especially outspoken against the use of torture. During the election he supported McCain for the republican nomination and Obama for the Democratic nomination and Obama in the general election.
dans, I don’t know what you mean about wearing this “on their sleeve.” Don’t heterosexual people wear their heterosexuality on their sleeve whenever they talk about their wives and kids?
“Don’t heterosexual people wear their heterosexuality on their sleeve whenever they talk about their wives and kids?”
What, you didn’t know gays have wives and children, too?
Zimzo, I said he was touted as a “gay republican” and then became increasingly progressive. Read my post.
Yes, yes, changed his mind on Bush, uh-huh. So, he was Progressive at the New Republic, then a moderate with a 9/11 conversion, then turned back and became a liberal…… sorry Zimy, I suspect he was always a liberal. He is just honest about it now. He became well known for holding some conservative viewpoints as a gay man, and has since crumbled back to his true identity.
Talked to your BFF Prof Gates lately? How was his beer summit?
“I could care less that he is gay ”
I care. HIV positive? Don’t they make homosexual condoms? It all shows a lack of morality and responsibility. I feel the same way about STD’s in heteros. And any redneck owning a sheep ranch should do time in the pokey (pun intended). Oh, I crack myself up!
Hmmm, East Grinsted and Sullivan. The picture becomes clearer.
“Don’t heterosexual people wear their heterosexuality on their sleeve whenever they talk about their wives and kids?”
Actually no zizmo, they are talking about their wife and kids. Gays can’t talk about their ‘wives’ w/o mentioning their sexuality ?
I see, dans, so when heterosexuals talk about their wife and kids they are talking about their wife and kids but when a gay man talks about his male partner and uses male pronouns, he’s wearing his sexuality on his sleeve.
#37
Basically yes Zimzo, a man talks about his wife and kids usually means he’s straight.
But a man or woman who talks about their partners usually means their gay. BFD, OK
It’s an open and direct statement by anyone talking about their family and or relationships.
BTW: What is sexuality on your sleeve? does that mean you wear your s&m outfit out doors, your doggie coller everywhear, ladies underwear under your clothes or does it mean you are wearing a star that says I’m Gay, straight or bi?
looking forward to this response if any.
dans is the one who said gays wear their sexuality on their sleeves. I don’t know what he means either. maybe he can explain.
“HIV positive?. . .It all shows a lack of morality and responsibility. . .I feel the same way about STD’s in heteros.”
You are a complete and utter idiot, I’ll go ahead and be the first one to say it.
eventhough there are lots of criticisms against Sarah Palin, i still admire her. she also did a lot of things in the area of politics specially in Alaska.
#39
Sorry Zimzo.
How about an explanation Dan.