More “tolerance” by GA Democrat David Scott:

http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/9980-Georgia-Democrat-screams-at-constituent-for-asking-question-on-health-care.html

After he dressed down his constituents he won’t comment on his rant, apparently it went on for approx 7 minutes.

I mean the one on David Scott. The original video confirms the thuggery going on on the Left.

Ron Bernstein pretty much gets it. Matthews and Tucker are a matched pair of fools. “Hardball” should be telecast from an outhouse.

White House Warns Rush: Nazi Talk Puts You On “Thin Ice And It Is Best Not Employed”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/07/white-house-warns-rush-na_n_254147.html?page=105&show_comment_id=28562333#comment_28562333

Thin Ice? Gee, that can be interpreted many ways.

It appears that half of the country is on “Thin Ice” in their opinion.

Yo, Frankie! Your definition of “anti-democratic” is demanding that your elected representatives read the bills they pass before passing them? Your definition of “anti-democratic” is insisting that those same elected representatives listen to and consider your viewpoint? And your definition of “anti-American” is refusing to roll over and play dead when Obama, Pelosi, and Reid ask you to?

Frankie, boy, somehow you managed to get your head screwed on backwards. No wonder Rachel had you on her show. You and she are a perfect match.

Now, Kevin, I just do not recall ever saying that you were a member of an uneducated “mob” or anything close to it. Not even Zimzo, to my recollection. Nor did I ever see union thugs or any other kind of thugs sent to break up Democratic or liberal protests. I mean, even that woman from CodePink who interrupted Palin’s speech at the Repub Convention was simply escorted from the hall by the usual security officials per standard procedure.

Yes, there are always some stupids at any event who say stupid things, but that seems to be common on all sides. When you attended a political event or a protest during those eight years, did you ever fear that some bozo with an anagram on his t-shirt was going to shove you into a wall or punch you in the mouth? And do you think anyone on this blog, for instance, would have approved of such tactics?

“Welcome to the last 8 years, folks!”

You keep saying stuff like this, Kevin, but when called to back it up with relevant and concrete examples, you ignore it.

I know you *can’t* back it up, so I really don’t expect anything else. Just wanted you to know that we notice, and mostly don’t want you thinking that this is somehow a winning argument for you.

This will become a bigger deal in the coming days as busloads of union thugs show up at these events and engage in increasingly thuggish behavior. After all, the administration itself has all-but-given the green light to do so …

Yeah, surprising in this one instance Kevin has no citations, huh?

And were they? Who was beaten, the speaker or the students?

The only time I recall a protester being tasered was at a Kerry speech …

Try again.

Here you go squiddy:
http://gnn.tv/headlines/4424/Police_attack_protesters_with_tasers_and_dogs

http://paganwiccan.about.com/b/2008/09/03/pagan-protesters-tasered-at-rnc.htm

etc.

It’s like you all have mass amnesia.

Jeezus, zimbo, I know you’re not stupid — but you persist in saying such stupid things.

You do know the difference between a legally appointed police officer and a self-appointed thug on the street who carries a gun, don’t you? Or are they the same in your would?

The White House is all-but directing their supporters, who have no legal authority, to confront opponents at Congressional townhalls – many of the comments from the left could be construed as advocating violence against these opponents.

I guess the equivalence would’ve been when President Bush told all his pro-life supporters to get out and confront the participants in the March for Women’s Lives, to get in their faces and shout them down.

Oh wait, that didn’t happen in *this* universe…

And you have to understand there’s a particular sensitivity to using mob rule, given this is the same President who said:

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set,” he said. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”

This guy’s tactics reminds me more and more of Hugo Chavez every day …

Zim, I guess this means that you stand opposed to sworn police officers upholding the law. So, by the Book of Zim protesters are allowed to ignore the orders of police officers enforcing the laws, and, when they suffer the inevitable consequences, the protesters are the innocents and the law enforcement officers are always the guilty ones. Amazing how some protesters, who believe in ignoring the law whenever they so please, are always the little angels. Personally, I am surprised at how often police officers exercise restraint in such situations — a good thing in the Book of Wolverine.

But, when it comes to private citizens enlisted as thugs to confront and possibly rough up other private citizens, it becomes a completely different story. I’m still waiting for your declaration on where you stand on this, Zim. I would imagine that we are together on the need for police officers to exhibit reasonable restraint. But, how do you feel about the thugs and the snitches, et al? And please don’t run away from this question like some of those Dem representatives are running away from the questions raised by their constituents.

Indeed…The situations have clearly been a setup for further legislation at our expense and freedoms:

Officials see rise in militia groups across US

“The stress of a poor economy and a liberal administration led by a black president are among the causes for the recent rise, the report from the Southern Poverty Law Center says. Conspiracy theories about a secret Mexican plan to reclaim the Southwest are also growing amid the public debate about illegal immigration.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090812/ap_on_re_us/us_militia_movement

The Southern Poverty Law Center targets and labels innocent citizens who don’t agree with the government.

“Conspiracy theories about a secret Mexican plan to reclaim the Southwest are also growing amid the public debate about illegal immigration.”

Conspiracy? Research “Mecha” who receives funds from La Raza and Aztlan.com and you will see hate for us and the desire to take the country.

“Sonya Sotomayor, served on the National Council of La Raza from 1998 to 2004 – beginning her involvement one year after the president of Mexico stood before the group and declared that “…the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important part of it.”
Jose Angle Gutierrez, founder of the La Raza Unida Party, “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

Those remarks and hundreds more exist on tapes.