ObamaCare legislation reveals what some of us have been warning about: Democrat vision for America is a police state:
… I am not fretting here about some remote and unlikely possibility. We are not speaking here of “slippery slopes” or in terms of “what comes next?”
We are instead objecting to a black-letter law spelled out for all to see in the very first piece of legislation you’re proposing.
Right out of the box. The state here — Pelosi, Reid, Obama — are claiming that they can imprison people for behavior that has never before even been hinted as being a crime, on the theory that such behavior constitutes unpatriotic economic behavior which is detrimental to the state’s balance sheets.
Read all of Ace’s essay. The point he makes deserves wide distribution. Then, we can start talking about impeachment.
CHECK THIS OUT: Obama talking health during his
campaign,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnDxqboVxMY&feature=player_embedded
Hopey Changey lying during the campaign, who would have thought?
Good read :
Obamacare Vote Chicanery Debunks Moderate Democrat Myth
By: Dick Morris & Eileen McGann
Don’t assume that the 38 Democrats who voted against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s extremist version of healthcare reform wouldn’t have supported it if their votes had been needed.
The days before the final passage on Saturday were not filled with stirring appeals to get Democrats to back the bill so much as an auction to decide whom to let off the hook.
Knowing that the bill probably be political suicide for any red-state Democratic member of Congress, particularly the freshmen, the House leadership had to negotiate with its members to assure that the 38 defectors were the ones who needed the political cover the most.
That there would be 38 Democrats who would oppose the bill was pre-ordained. Who they would be was the subject of negotiations right up to the wire.
Read Full Story at Newsmax
The House has passed a health care bill and now awaits action from the Senate. Harry Reid keeps saying he expects a Senate vote before Christmas.
In the midst of all this brouhaha in the House, coupled with the need to catch up on some personal things, I have lost track somewhat of where we stand in the Senate. The last I remember is a bill coming out of the Baucus committee with an aye vote from Snowe of Maine. Then Snowe warns that, if the final Senate bill contains X, Y, and Z, she will vote against it. Occasionally I hear some negative opinions out of Nelson and Lieberman.
Has anybody out there kept on top of the action in the Senate? Is there available somewhere at least an outline of where the Senate is on this thing at this moment and where the fights are going on? Is there any clue yet as to how the Senate bill may look when Reid puts it up for a vote? Anybody tabulating how the aye and nay votes might stack up? Seems like you can’t turn away from this computer for a minute without get stuck with a Gordian Knot of sorts when you come back.
What do you expect from the same people that want to label veterans and anyone that doesn’t agree with them as Domestic Terrorists.
Remarks were made that weapons in the hands of veterans was dangerous because they consider them time bombs.
Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin were on a list similar to a terrorists list, they were running against the Dipshit. I believe it was in Missouri.
DHS has eliminated the word Terrorist with something like Man Created Tragedy.
They also want to control the internet.
People were warned.
Bill Ayers, Obama’s bud, wrote a book where 20M people in the US are killed in order to bring about a leftist Utopia. This is the kind of people the anointed one keeps company.