Baton Rouge Police Officer Montrell Jackson pictured holding his four month old son, who is now without a father.
The so-called Black Lives Matter movement have fostered this environment. They are disgusting.
As these very incidents attest, it is that blue..or tan or gray…line that is the only thing between all of the rest of us and a societal catastrophe. Support them wherever and whenever you can.
A Black rapper named “Game” and several others of the genre are starting a campaign in Los Angeles to get the gangs to stop the violence in their own neighborhoods. Game made a statement which I believe is long overdue and ought to have a place of highest prominence for the good of all of us regardless of race or ethnicity.
“Because the sad truth that no one wants to face is, before we can get OUR LIVES TO MATTER to anyone else…we need to show that OUR LIVES MATTER to US!!!!”
Truth. It is sharp.
Use to be that shooting a cop was an automatic death penalty. Now that race as been injected into the mix, these shooters may not receive that when all said and done, to stave off rioting don’t you know. It might help things if the Racist-in-Chief would just shut his mouth until Jan. 20th and then just fade away…..to the Middle East hopefully.
Well, Donald J.Trump did it. He got the Republican nomination on the first ballot. He said he would do it, and he did it.
Most of the usual pundits and the pols said he couldn’t possibly do it. And, then, we those fools saw how many Americans were responding to him and not to them, they began to panic like turkeys in a thunder storm at the turkey farm. They tried to kneecap him en route to his victory and they failed miserably once again. Then the more disgusting among the pols decided they would boycott the convention at which Trump would be given the brass ring. And the arrogant jerks found out that nobody gave a shit whether they were in Cleveland or not. The celebration went on without them.
The despicable media are beside themselves with frustration — so off their vile game that they have become stuck in the mire of trying to shame a beautiful wife and mother over a paltry handful of words in a long speech lauding the talent and smarts of her man. Why, one might think from the media and blog bullshit that the woman had stood up there on that stage in Cleveland and told us that the Benghazi casualties were the result of a popular demonstration against a video…..or something like that.
Now, this Trump fellow is saying that he is going to win the Oval office in November and he is going to win it big. Well, that determined fellow certainly kicked ass and beat the heavy odds in the first round of the battle. It might be wise to be careful where you put your money on the final round. This guy apparently doesn’t believe in quitting.
Quite an accomplishment for Trump, he was given a 1% chance of winning the nomination.
I read somewhere that the “staffer” who assisted Mrs. Trump with her speech has been a registered crat since 1996.
No one can say anything about the way Trump raised his family, anyone would be proud to have kids like his.
Had Enough –
Do you suppose the mothers (all 3 of them) had something to do
with raising the kids?
Ivanka herself has said that her father wasn´t exactly a hands-on dad.
Lovisa, it sounded to me from the Cleveland speeches by the Trump kids that the Trump version of “hands-on” was to get his kids out of the world of wealthy inherited idleness and into the kind of atmosphere where you had to get your hands dirty, figuratively and literally, by working side by side in a hard hat with the actual field employees. Didn’t one of the boys say that he knew how to drive and use a piece of heavy construction equipment? Reminds me of my own blue collar father and father-in-law and our four sets of grandfathers.
Well, I’ll be darned if old Bernie Sanders wasn’t right on the money about the DNC trying deliberately to shaft his primary campaign on behalf of Hillary Clinton. And Wasserman-Schultz, apparently a principal perp, is being made to walk the DNC scandal plank on behalf of the “team.” Then they give her the sop of an “honorary” role in Hillary’s campaign.
I tell you, those crazy Clintons will try to screw anybody who may be in the way of their personal ambitions. They shouldn’t be allowed in polite society, much less be given a repeat in the White House.
Despite the terrible optics of Hillary appointing DWS to the role she’d been unofficially playing as the DNC chairwoman, (a slap in the face to every Sanders supporter), I think Hillary once again reinforced to those who might help – or hurt her – the realities of the Clinton “way”:
Play ball with them, support/enable their political aspirations, be loyal to them, fall on your sword for them – and they’ll be loyal to you, and pay you back with abundant power, position, and money – or pardons
Stand in their way, oppose them, fail to be loyal, and be torn apart by a herd of feral pigs …
By the way, in case you missed it, here’s the headline at Wikileaks from the DNC dump:
Today, Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks releases 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee — part one of our new Hillary Leaks series.
“part one” ….
But Hillary claims she knew nothing about the DNC attempts to sandbag the Sanders campaign. Well, that’s what she said in a media interview not long ago. I mean, she said she didn’t know anything about it and that………….oh. forget it. It was all the fault of the Russians anyway.
I hear that Trump is being backed by Putin. Those email leaks are trying to get him elected since he owes lots money to Russians in his business deals . When he wins he pays off that debt using taxpayer money. This is all in his tax returns which is why he won’t release them. Republicans, terrible negotiators, nominated him without checking his financial vulnerabilities first. Fools! Voting for Trump is voting for Putin.
George must have gotten his talking points from the Hillary campaign team.
But, I wonder how George knows what is in Trump’s unreleased tax returns? And how does George know what is in those Trump “deals” with the Russians? And how does George know that Trump and Putin are in cahoots about the election? Oh oh, George must be leaking classified intelligence information as well as IRS info on a private citizen. Wooo, that could get one into deep legal trouble……….unless George is only bullshitting like a typical liberal.
Now, back to the subject at hand, i.e. the actual contents of those DNC emails about how Bernie was getting shafted during the primaries. Some pretty underhanded stuff in there. And Wikileaks is promising more dumps of captured emails. Too bad for the Dems. The truth really hurts when it rebounds and smacks the liars in the ass. Then they come up with all kinds of excuses and diversions. For those who are old enough or historically versed enough to remember that good old comedian Flip Wilson: “The Devil made me do it?!!”
Those emails have been modified to make the DNC look bad. You are a fool to trust hacked emails. Campaigns always have dirty tricksters. Bet you’ve been scammed out of your money too. Anyone who supports trump is an easy mark for fraudsters.
Not sure *where* he got his talking points, Wolv – can’t even keep them straight – first, it was Putin, trying to get Trump elected, (dunno why, since it was Hillary that presented them with that uber-cool reset button) — now, it seems, they’re made up by some pranksters.
Of course, if they weren’t real, why did she resign?
Think we’ve met another member of the tin-foil hat brigade …
“This is the LAST straw. Please call Phil a Griffin. This is outrageous. She needs to apologize. ” — DWS
Yeah, I see, Squiddy. Wasserman Shultz fell on her DNC sword and jeopardized her Florida House re-election chances because of doctored and untrue emails. Makes sense — for a liberal.
Nothing to see here, either, Wolve …
All of our enemies want Trump elected. North Korea’s Kim, Putin. All of the dictators. Makes one wonder. Bet they think Trump is easier to manipulate than Clinton.
Oh, I imagine those foreign potentates are just shaking in their boots about the possibility of having to match wits with the Butcher of Benghazi. But they need not worry. All they would have to do to stay ahead of her is read her private mail.
Actually, George’s previous comments about Trump and Putin reminded me of something. The Washington Free Beacon recently reported on the matter using the Wikileaks “Panama Papers” as a principal source.
You may recall The Podesta Group, a lobbying firm founded in circa 1988 by brothers John and Tony Podesta. John, of course, is well known for his time with the Obama cabal and is now a bigwig in Hillary’s campaign apparatus. Tony is known as a “bundler” for the Dems. The lobbying firm seems to do pretty well at siphoning cash out of the corporate pockets of a large number of US and foreign companies and foreign governments seeking political access and a better public brand.
Well, according to the “Panama Papers,” The Podesta Group recently registered to lobby for the US-based branch of Russia’s big Sberbank. This apparently happened just weeks before Wikileak broke loose with the Panama Papers and other hacked data dumps. To make a long story shorter, Sberbank reportedly has been a significant player in much of the reported government corruption attributed to the Putin regime.
So, we seem to have a major Russian bank with accusations of ties to big-time Russian governmental corruption being represented in Washington and elsewhere by a firm belonging to a fellow who is a chief honcho of the Hillary Clinton campaign and another, related, fellow who arranges for big donations to Dem candidates. The objective of The Podesta Group is said to be to try to soften US sanctions against Russian over the Ukraine affair.
Now, I cannot personally vouch for this story anymore than George can vouch for what is in Donald Trump’s tax returns. But it certainly does seem to have possibilities as an interesting Democrat pile of skeletal bones in the party closet.
Well, if the Russians are backing Trump and want to damage Hillbilly, wouldn’t they be worried about any “hard trail” getting back to where Hillbilly managed to give uranium rights here in America to the Russians? I guess Putin doesn’t worry about anything……except maybe having to listen to a banshee cackle for 4 years or more. Besides we have already seen the Putin gets bored when dealing with a pussy. He would rather have a real fight to see who blinks first. It is all about the game with him. N. Korea is just like Iran. They will just blast the infidels regardless if their whole country becomes “collateral damage”. The definition of peasants is “fodder”.
George is one of those gifts which never stops giving. It is well worth the effort to check out an article by Peter Schweitzer in the 31 July 2016 internet edition of the Wall Street Journal. The principal players in the article are the Hillary/Obama-instigated US-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission (complete with “reset button”), the Russian high tech “innovation city” of Skolkovo, and the Clinton Foundation. Quite a tangled web it would seem.
Found it interesting to read that Peter Schweitzer was
Sarah Palin’s foreign policy advisor. I’s\m sure he’s most trustworthy.
And most recently the author of “Clinton Cash.” The book was well received and opened a lot of eyes about the flow of big bucks to the Clintons and to the Clinton Foundation. Top seller. Obviously why he got to write the linked piece for the Wall Street Journal. He knows his stuff.
I think brandishing the term “trustworthy” in any attempt to defend the Clintons or to divert from the Clintonian discussion at hand is not too swift an idea.
Go back and take another look at the recent video of Hillary Clinton being interviewed by Chris Wallace of FOX. That woman piles lie upon lie, even when the facts are easily checked. It is like she is so compelled to respond with falsehoods that she cannot help herself. Lying must be a mental addiction for her. She even contradicted FBI Director Comey’s testimony before the House concerning her private server — as if no one, including Wallace, had ever seen or will ever see that Comey testimony video. That performance of hers was sick…really sick.
And now we are hearing once again from the libs about Donald Trump’s four college deferments and one medical deferment during the Vietnam War. As if Trump was the only one of his generation who ever had a draft deferment.
Reminds one of a certain fellow named Clinton who lied to his Arkansas draft board about having signed up with the National Guard and then waltzed away from Vietnam era military service under false pretenses. And was later involved in anti-war protests in Britain during his period of “non-study” at Oxford.
Are the libs really so stupid as to bring up the subject of Vietnam service in these circumstances? Looks like it.
“As if Trump was the only one ….”
Does that make it right?
But Mom / all the other kids can do it.
Sorry, Lovisa; but when draft deferments are legal and are offered, people will take them.
If you want to smack Trump with a right or wrong on that, you will have to smack every kid of that era who took student and/or medical deferments. If I, as a Vietnam vet, can get beyond that, you should be able to do the same and not fall for the same liberal nonsense they tried to pull on Romney.
But a key point here is that Slick Willie purposely lied to get out of the draft. Why do you seem so resistant to wrapping your brain around the fact that both the Clintons have been proven to be egregious and inveterate liars at virtually every stage of their lives?
Incidentally, even the Washington Post gave Hillary four “Pinocchios” on her sorry performance in the Chris Wallace interview. I believe that is the maximum the Post fact checkers ever give. No wonder Hillary avoids press conferences. Sad state of affairs for this country.
Trump. Such a role model of Republican family values, Republican patriotism, and Republican truth telling. (sarcasm off)
Trump’s advanced age, unfiltered comments, narcissism, and anger are symptoms of dementia. Or he is just drunk most of the time. Either way he is unfit for the job. Say what you will about Hillary, but at least she has the experience to do the job and would not take the country into bankruptcy, the only thing Trump knows how to do.
Who is Geoge?
Hillary lies and appears to have no compunction about it. Moreover, she is not even an effective liar since she gets caught so often because of her own compulsion and stupidity.
If your doctor lied to you about your medical status, would you keep him/her as your doctor? If your dentist lied to you about your teeth, would you continue to patronize his office? If your car mechanic lied to you about the repairs on your car, would you continue to bring your car there. If your newspaper lied to you, would you continue to subscribe? If your grocer lied about the quality of his products, would you continue to shop there?
Probably not. So, why on earth would anyone with an ounce of common sense cast a vote for a proven liar to be the commander-in-chief, thereby placing the safety and well being of all of us and our families in her dishonest hands?
” but at least she has the experience to do the job and would not take the country into bankruptcy..”
This is a normal liberal brain. For anyone else, this would be their brain on hallucinogens.
She would take the country into bankruptcy and then try to lie about it. Probably blame it all on some guy with a video.
Hey! Trump is the one who’s the specialist when it comes to bankruptcy;
not Clinton !!!
The Clintons have always been bankrupt in the integrity department. As Scout as maintained: They are just a pair of “Arkansas grifters.”
Even when Hillary is caught flat-footed telling lies, she will not admit guilt. Now she has taken to blaming her errant responses during the Wallace interview on some sort of internal “short circuit.”
Hah! She must have spent most of her life being short-circuited! That must explain those old Rose law firm documents being “lost” in the White House library back in the 1990′s. Darn short circuits can get you every time!
You stated my views correctly, Wolve, except that I wouldn’t have used the word “just”. They are excellent at what they do. They took their act national and it worked like a charm. The hell of it this cycle is that the GOP enablers decided to let them do it to us once again. Why give them that chance?
Note to Rep Scott Rigel (R-VA): You’re a fool.
Scout, on that “other blog,” at 10:08 AM on 3 August 2016, under the thread “Where is the Virginia Republican Moral Compass,” conservative blogger Steve Thomas listed you as being among those whom he doubted he could convince to oppose Hillary Clinton. According to your ramblings here, you claimed this is not to be the case. Yet you left Mr. Thomas swinging in the wind under assault by such leftist doofi as DUMP TRUMP, ROBIN HOOD and WATCHING.
Now, I want you to find that famous sticking place, attach some courage to it, and go over to that particular blog and relieve Mr. Thomas of the “misunderstanding” we all have about you and the short-circuited Butcher of Benghazi. And be sure you use that phrase “Arkansas grifters”! Hope to it lad! Chop, chop!
That should have been “Hop to it,” not “Hope to it.” I have little hope that Scout will find the sticking place.
Just to be clear, Wolve, I don’t buy into the Benghazi hoopla. The Benghazi office probably would have been vulnerable no matter who was president, who was Secretary of State. We have incurred quite a few casualties at embassies and consulates around the world under administrations of every stripe.
As to your other point, I have used the phrase “grifters” at that site in connection with the Clintons, and I have also made clear there that I’m not a fan of theirs. My estimation of them is not increased by the fact that Trump is the most unqualified candidate nominated by either party in my lifetime. As for Steve, he does a reasonably good job of taking care of himself. He and I have quite different views on Trump, I think. I don’t think he particularly needs me to amplify his negative feelings about the Clintons, and I can’t help him do anything for Mr. Trump, who, in my view, has to be actively opposed to protect the Nation from a total void in the character, temperament, experience, judgment, and personality necessary to be President of the United States.
I disagree, Scout. I am very familiar with what goes on at that blog, and I do not see you as ever adequately taking Clinton to the proverbial woodshed — if you are, as you say, anti-Clinton. Just like here, you seem to be addicted over there to put downs of the few posters who deign to disagree with the host and other progs at that locale. So, stop the law school doublespeak and admit it. You won’t take up the anti-Clinton cause over there because you are not anti-Clinton. OR you are afraid of losing those “standing O’s” the progs who dwell there give you when you try to gut a conservative who doesn’t meet your “Establishment Republican” standards . So much for you and the sticking place.
As for your views on Benghazi, I don’t think you know squat about protecting an overseas mission from terrorist attacks, even though, Walter Mitty-like, you try to act like you do. So, there is no point in engaging you on a subject on which you dwell in Clintonian ignorance.
Looks like we can add our old buddy the Half Troll to the list over at that blog. He finally found a place where he won’t be called out when he tries to dump a load on the non-progs.
Not only is Rigel a fool, but also a coward. Rigel comes out against Trump and those who support Trump when he, Rigel, is not running for re-election. Good riddance to him.
I didn’t lie about those emails. I had a “short circuit.”
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I’m sorry folks, but that one makes me burst out laughing from time to time. Can’t help it.
Wolve – I have no hesitation at all admitting that I am far more anti-Trump than I am anti-Clinton. I guess that comes from my historical Republican affiliations and my firm belief that Trump presents a clear and present danger, whereas she would probably be just kind of like Clinton 1.0, which was tawdry, but not potentially fatal for the Nation.
Whatever I say here or at the other sites I frequent is for my own amusement and interest. I approach this activity much as I do the NYT crossword puzzles – it’s something to do on subjects that interest me. I get not particular jollies from any particular person either liking or disliking what I say. I state my views as best I can, and then move on.
RE Benghazi, if your point is that I haven’t been part of the Marine Corps protection detail at an embassy, I’ll concede that. I’m not sure why you thought I was implying that I had been. I have been in a lot of embassies and consulates around the world during my government service, most of them in pretty secure locations. But I have friends who have been in security positions in embassies in tough spots. Fatal attacks on embassies and consulates didn’t start with Benghazi. In each case, you can find things that, in hindsight, could have been done better. My point on Benghazi in the context of the 2016 election, however, is that I haven’t seen anything from any of the multiple reports on this that convince me that Mrs. Clinton bears special personal responsibility for what happened other than the general responsibility that the government of the United States always bears when something goes wrong that costs us lives of valuable public servants, be the diplomats or military personnel. It’s a very tough world out there, particularly for the United States. It will be that way for a very long time, probably beyond both your and my lifetime.
Mrs. Clinton had the direct responsibility to ensure the protection of that entire mission in Libya, and she failed miserably, most likely through failure to pay attention when she should have been thoroughly on top of one of our hottest and most dangerous spots of that moment in time. There are no excuses for her.
Sorry, Scoutie. I really don’t care how many embassies you may have visited or how many friends with whom you have chatted. You have never worked that beat or had the direct responsibility. The day when you get to advise me on the ins and outs about a place like Benghazi is the day when I will advise you of the details on how to file a legal case in a federal court just because I worked with the FBI and with DOJ attorneys assigned to counterterrorism. Or maybe I can take out your appendix because I was in a hospital a couple of years ago. Never happen.
Whoa! That photo I just saw on Drudge looked like Hillary Clinton was being helped up the steps to an assisted living facility. What gives?
Or rather: “…as if she was at an assisted living facility.”
Wolve – if you were there, I defer to you on factual points as to what happened, and your observation of those events. It’s not clear to me that you are making that claim. Otherwise, I treat your comments as opinion. My own opinion is based on the layers of reports emanating from the Congress over the past few years. Benghazi was a tragic event in which we lost some excellent people. As an event of political significance affecting our ability to judge the capabilities and character of the current candidates, its significance is limited to being one of a hundred pieces of the mosaic of US Middle East policy, a policy that has to be examined from at least 2001 forward, if not 1948 forward.
I strongly disagree. I contend that Benghazi represents a major policy/security failure by a Secretary of State who boasted that she had been influential in pushing for the foreign policy and military actions which created the Libyan problems in the first place. Clinton obviously had done no homework on the socio-political-tribal elements making up Libya under Qaddafi and how potentially lethal internal rivalries were held in check by the regime through both oil money and force. Or maybe she did know it and didn’t give a damn because singing kumbayah about the Arab Spring was more important than the reality of possible consequences.
The Obama-Clinton policy removed the glue holding Libya together and left the place in political and security shambles. And this at a time when our military actions in the Gulf had served to scare Qaddafi away from his long involvement in state-sponsored terrorism and away from his nuclear ambitions. (I personally spent enough time fighting against that SOB and his oil money to know what a relief that change of mind was to a lot of people.)
At best it can only be assumed from Clinton’s denials of ever having been advised of the numerous requests from our Tripoli mission for more security that she negligently put Libya on a personal back burner despite the fact that there was an extremely high threat level against US personnel, including a career ambassador whom she claimed to have personally pushed for the difficult Libyan post. At worst she knew about those requests and either left them to subordinates or told those subordinates to refuse them. Then came the Benghazi attack and the blatant lies about that attack which I don’t have to repeat here.
I contend that this entire miserable Libyan episode in American foreign policy is strikingly indicative of why Hillary Clinton should not be allowed into the Oval Office. It abundantly illustrates her lack of policy foresight, her lack of concern for the lives of American personnel abroad, and her absurd lack of personal integrity.
But, if you need even more ammo, there are certainly plenty of smelly logs floating in the Clinton turd pond.
” Fatal attacks on embassies and consulates didn’t start with Benghazi.”
This is very true – and is also not the point and never was, and those who cast Benghazi as something as limited as embassy force protection failures or the pathetic response to the attack are actually providing cover to Clinton and the President.
Secretary of State Clinton pushed hard for an intervention in Libya ’cause “reasons” to depose a government that, while certainly no model of democracy was neither causing any trouble in the neighborhood – they were behaving precisely as we’d asked them to – and our intervention was never justified at the time.
So, why was she throw her weight behind it? Seems pretty clear it fueled by her desire to polish up her credentials, an “achievement”, a “legacy” to mark her time at State *That’s* why we helped turn Libya into chaos? That’s why countless thousands died and continue to do do – to polish up her resume?
And celebrating the ugly death of Gaddafi with her wanna-be Julius Caesar “We came, we saw, he died” laughter was as creepy a statement as has ever been recorded on camera by a US official, much less our chief diplomat.
Benghazi itself was a lot of things – bureaucratic incompetence, to be sure – but the worse thing in my mind was the lack of response, the lack of an even an attempt to intervene. Whether we could have reached there in time to affect the outcome is irrelevant – point is, we didn’t even try.
That and the lying and deliberate deceitful cover-up that took place later, because of an election, sure, but it was also scapegoating – Clinton didn’t care so much about the election, as much as she cared about her own reputation. As though the assassination-by-proxy of a sitting head of state wasn’t damaging enough…
As Wolve summarized, it was an appalling lack of foresight, predictable from the very beginning.
She also amply demonstrated a lack of concern for American lives overseas, and displayed no integrity, no “buck stops here” willingness to accept responsibility.
But of course, even her Libya policy is only one of many breathtaking policy failures under her tenure – from Russian resets (with the wrong Russian word on the reset button, ‘natch – not that *that* ever seemed to make the news), to failing to support the Iranian Green movement to undermining Mubarak, to the Syrian kettle of disasters, to Ukraine, to failing to obtain a SOFA with Iraq, to premature drawdowns in Afghanstan, to cancelling the Polish anti-missile defense deployment without reason or notice, to the laughable attempt to inject herself into the Bin Laden operation to souring our relationship with Israel – seriously, just what was achieved under her watch?
I see that the Communist Party USA has come through again in 2016 with its usual support of the Democratic presidential candidate — well, at least usual since the passage of the Gus Hall era. The Reds, or what is left of them, seem to think that they and Hillary/Kaine make a nicely matched pair walking down the matrimonial aisle of political power.
Some of the old “Establishment Republican” pachyderms are squealing like piglets, claiming they will not vote for Trump, threatening to vote for the Butcher of Benghazi or no one at all, signing letters wherein they pretend to be psychologists examining the Trump psyche….what have you out of that arrogant lot. I think they finally awoke to the fact that the support of Trump by so many voters is a direct reflection of their own assignment to the dog house of political history, largely because of their lies to and ignoring of those same voters and their utter inability to protect the country from the fools currently occupying the Oval Office.
Vive la Revolution!
So, on Tuesday, this 62-year-old fellow is walking through a Friendly’s parking lot in Bloomfield, New Jersey. He is wearing a Trump t-shirt. Up comes this other fellow who begs to differ politically with the 62-year-old. He then beats the older man with a crowbar and flees before the police can arrive.
Hillary supporters. Yuck!
Vive la Revolution.
And is there any doubt why the Dems want to rid the country of 2A? What is all this talk about civility? More like a ruse to keep decent people off guard while the scumbags doing the talking and pointing the fingers take advantage. I guess if you are going to say or wear something that will piss off a lib, arm yourself with something else beside the truth.
Civility!!!! Are you perhaps speaking of
someone rude and crude – like, say Donald Trump?
Wonder whether any Trump fans have hit any non-believers?
So, two weeks ago, “George” inadvisedly threw this up on his keyboard:
“I hear that Trump is being backed by Putin. Those email leaks are trying to get him elected since he owes lots money to Russians in his business deals . When he wins he pays off that debt using taxpayer money. This is all in his tax returns which is why he won’t release them. Republicans, terrible negotiators, nominated him without checking his financial vulnerabilities first. Fools! Voting for Trump is voting for Putin.”
Seems that many, including Assange, are saying or at least implying the source of those emails was a DNC staffer, one Seth Rich. Unfortunately, said staffer can’t confirm / deny this since he was murdered – left bruised and battered and shot to death in Washington DC a few weeks back, in a “street robbery” that left all his valuables still with him.
Wikileaks has posted a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of his killer(s).
What say you, George?
I can think of one time, Lovisa. That was at a Trump event in Georgia where a supporter threw a punch at an anti-Trump demonstrator who had penetrated to the floor of the event and was being removed by police. The Trump supporter was arrested and charged with assault.
I don’t know how that Georgia case played out in the court but I do not recall any arrests in San Jose when that large crowd of anti-Trump protesters physically attacked Trump supporters before and after the event. Do you recall that young woman being surrounded and “egged” in the face by anti-Trumpers? All in front of San Jose cops who didn’t lift a finger to stop the attacks because the Chief didn’t want to aggravate the situation — Yeesh!
Can you think of any other attacks by pro-Trumpers? Or any gross violations of private property like that dingbat woman in CT, I believe, who goes onto the lawns of others at night and spray paints swastikas on Trump campaign signs? Anything? As Mrs. Wolve remarked to me the other night: Seeing all the street confrontations initiated by the Clinton side, anybody who puts a Trump sign on their car is going to risk getting the vehicle keyed or otherwise vandalized.
The Clinton emails being released to the public now show a very interesting and incestuous interplay between big donors to the Clinton foundations and Hillary’s Department of State, with the foundations as the middlemen. Greased palms here, greased palms there, greased palms everywhere. Grifters those Clintons certainly are. The biased US media is no doubt preparing once again to reinforce the Clinton teflon on this one.
“What say you, George?” I must be right since Trump won’t release his tax returns. What does he have to hide? Maybe he got beat by a woman–Hillary earning more income than he did. How embarrassing! Perhaps it is because he gives no money to charity. Pathetic! But he clearly has ties to Russian crime and the death of Seth Rich proves it because it is classic spy v. spy to try to frame your opponent for your dirty tricks. Incompetent! It seems only the most clueless losers will believe Trumps lies even when they are carefully documented and verifiably false. The country is full of idiots. Now they are all in one party. Makes it easy to ignore all Republicans.
It sounds like George may be trying to get Hollywood to accept a new James Bond script. Nancy Pelosi is a natural for the next “Bond girl” since the latest hack on the Dems was reportedly her personal PC.
When will Hillary release her medical records? What does she have to hide?
An international money-bag joker involved in one of the Clinton Foundation-State Department mutual back scratching deals reportedly put $500,000 into Slick Willie’s pocket for making a speech. Now, THAT should really make honest Americans vomit en masse.
If you like conspiracy, how about those Clinton aides drawing pay from the State Department while helping to push the agenda of the Clinton Foundation on a “volunteer” basis? And Huma Abedin having a trifecta going because of employment by a company founded by a former Clinton Foundation official? Ian Fleming himself might have trouble adapting that incestuous Clinton mess to the silver screen. However, Scorsese might be able to……
Robert De Niro is totally nuts.
Little bit of a balky posting system tonight.
Slick Willie is out there trying to defend his truth-unabled wife by claiming that FBI Director James Comey served up “the biggest load of bull I’ve ever seen.”
Sorry, Willie. No one could never outdo “I did not have sex with that woman — Ms. Lewinsky!” or “It depends on what the meaning of “is” is.”
There is no shame in the DNA of either of those Clintons.
Comments will be closed on August 13, 2017.
It is March 28, 2017, 7:25 pm