novatownhall blog

Where you are held accountable for your convictions and record

Browsing Posts in Den of Thieves

Who said the good-old-boy establishment didn’t exist in the LCRC? I wouldn’t have voted for half of the candidates last election (if I was able to vote for all) because they didn’t fill the bill for ethical candidates serving the people. Seems that some are trying to booger the Sheriff’s race also.

I am hearing from others about me becoming a delegate again. I won’t be here so I can’t, but the people asking are looking to knock Chapman out of office Here is one article to read. I normally don’t like Feds working in local venues or the other way around. It is an apples-to-oranges scenario. The choice I had last election was determined by ethics and I voted for Chapman because I believed him to be the best person for the job for ALL county citizens. I had my doubts. I read and hear things that Chapman is liberal. I haven’t seen a liberal or conservative ideology in his performance of the job. I’ve seen where ABSOLUTELY NO DEPUTIES like him or want to work for him. Really? Let’s have a show of hands from the deputies, otherwise it is only foolhearty hearsay. I read he doesn’t know how to budget and blew his budget one year. Sup. Buona, who castigated Chapman, should look at his own dealings with ripping off Loudoun citizens. Being inept and ignorant is not a crime. I didn’t expect Chapman to be a perfect manager right off the bat. He did what he should have and relied on others to help him in certain areas. Some of those others failed him and he took the hit. You can fix ineptness and ignorance. I have talked with Mike on several occasions. He is a likable guy.

Ok, so let’s look at his opponent, Eric Noble. I never met the guy but he seems to have had a great service record with the LCSO. Valors, awards, promotions. Ricky Frye likes him and I like Ricky. Then I came across something disturbing, which you can read here. I was told about this site but when I did an internet review of Noble, it appeared right along with Noble. When you read it, you will get the impression that Noble and his friends are very childish in behavior. Someone that doesn’t take their job or themselves very serious. What got serious was, to me, a tendency of dereliction of duty. The other articles said he retired. This article says he was terminated with prejudice. Hello? And if you have or have had a security clearance, you know not to do anything to ever jeopardize it. These are lasting things that stay with you forever. Why did Noble say he retired? Why the multiple monikers to blog sites to disgrace your boss? Childish behavior or just dangerous antics? You decide. The only thing I want to do is ask Sheriff Mike if it is true about Noble’s termination (just to reassure myself).

You look at what is being said about Chapman and Noble and make your own decision. There is still time to become a delegate. Something that really raises my hackles is a statement from a member of LoCo govt, stating that if you lose the GOP primary, back the candidate and don’t run as an independent (this race in particular, is how it was addressed). Why is that necessary now and not before? Fishy. Stinky fishy. These type politics stink because there is a lack of or, better yet, an absence of ethics. This isn’t about the most likable person for the job but the most trustworthy. With what I read, I can’t give Noble my trust. And I wouldn’t vote for him and put a burden on the citizens. We don’t deserve that. We need better than this.

This seems to be what the BATFE is trying to push off upon those ignorant masses called American citizens. Townhall picked up on this and reported it here. (NOTE: The report date of 2014 is in error. The guidelines are for starting date of January 2015.) So is this an error or just another end around from the Obama administration? When are these people going to be held accountable? When will they be fired and permanently banned from working for or with the U.S. Government? When will they be IMPRISONED? I would ask when they would be executed but the government and the liberals don’t have the stomach for Capitol punishment because they may be caught in the web themselves. Imagine that. Anyway, with his new enlightenment to the general public, do you really think that the public comment period is going to have any impact on the already “conclusive” decision the ATF has made to ban this ammunition? Can you say “fat chance”.

Sorry. I wanted to get this out earlier but the transcript wasn’t available. I watched it live and was very excited through the whole speech. Unfortunately it wasn’t the leader of MY country making me feel good, but that of ANOTHER country. This speech was needed to be said and heard. READ THE WHOLE THING SO THAT YOU UNDERSTAND ITS IMPORTANCE.

There were many Congress critters absent, although you could not tell because this was a PACKED HOUSE! Even Feinstein was there after she said she wouldn’t be. Pelosi was there, annoyingly and continuously turning around to talk to others. Who was very conspicuously absent was Plugs Biden. Well, his schedule says he is doing this. Not sure what it is but it is consistent with this administration: when things are in crisis mode, there is always time to f#^koff and be political. Nature of the beast.

When you read this transcript, you will see things like “the enemy of my enemy is my enemy” and “Israel can stand up for itself”. He is giving Obama a chance to do the right thing but he is stating that the U.S. will not keep Israel from doing what is necessary for its protection. Bravo BiBi, bravo.

As I await the speech to AIPAC from Netanyahu, I hear from members of Congress who will snub him when he gives his speech to Congress tomorrow. Most of the Obama administration “heads” will be conveniently out of town. They’ve had enough notice to redo their schedules to be present , which means this is really just a snub. Here is one article on the issue.

Now when Amb. Samantha Power spoke, she said many things. She got some applause but then raised her eyebrows each time, like she had just hit a home run. I, personally, thought it a disgusting display, as my interpretation was that of “politics being played”. To strengthen that belief, she stated that Obama reiterated that Iran WILL NOT GET A NUCLEAR WEAPON. PERIOD. What does “will not get” mean? Won’t be able to buy one? Won’t be able to make one? Won’t be able to steal one? All ambiguous and subjective from my point of view. Above all, we have another “period” statement. That tells me a lie is being perpetrated and something underhanded is moving forward; based, of course, on past behavior from this administration.

When Netanyahu spoke, he only spoke as to why he would speak to Congress tomorrow. He believes that there is a strong relationship with the U.S. and Obama. He only wants to let our governing body know how Much Israel is in danger. But there are ads from Jstreet, supposedly objective and conservative Jews, who say this is a bad idea for both Israel and the U.S. I did some research into Jstreet. This article should sum it up pretty well. All in all, there seems to be great opposition towards this visit and speech from Netanyahu. I won’t ask why because I already know. Unfortunately, Israel, on this subject, also has our best interests in hand because our administration is willing to weaken the world and put everyone in jeopardy by allowing a nuclear terrorist state. People who have openly declared destruction of their perceived enemies, of which we are one.

And then you have John Kerry, chief lackey for all affairs foreign, trying to assemble some type of coherent speak on the issue. When he stated that “Israel is safer” because of the interim agreement with Iran. After all these Obama years of indoctrination, this should be easily believed by the masses, no? Trying to remember what that interim agreement was. Something like we will lift sanctions and Iran will stop buying and using centrifuges while allowing inspectors to see every aspect of their nuclear program. How is that working out?

This is pretty unfair of me. It is so-o-o-o hard to type when you are trying to curtail the laughter (or sadness, shock, awe, whatever). Adding to the “I couldn’t make this stuff up” column of this administration and the inept people installed in positions of power, importance, in view of the public, I present you with this. I suppose that Obama really, really, REALLY, didn’t want us to find out about what his strategy was. Can’t say that I blame him. How do we afford to influence thru governance (read: MONEY) or create jobs (read: MONEY) in these jihadi countries when we can’t make ends meet here at home? I do have one idea. How about a government mandated gun buy-back program from these terrorists? If we don’t want to kill them, let’s buy their AK-47s so that they can get some cool gear from Best Buy. I’m hoping Jack won’t take issue with this type buy-back.

First Obama makes this big speech, with Biden, Kerry and Hagel hanging around, about submitting to Congress a request for war powers. It is said to have bi-partisan support and should get passed. I don’t see it. The Dems want to lock it down to a geographical area (which Va. goofy sen. Kaine is all about), along with a 3 year sunset. Here we go again showing our intent for the needs of our enemies.

Now we all know that Yemen, Obama’s shining star in the Middle East, who was declared as a friend or ally of America, has fallen to rebels. The leader was ousted and the cabinet/congress dissolved. Well we now find out that the American Embassy there has been closed down. The Marine contingent was told to relinquish their arms to some Yemen “dignitary” before boarding a private plane and leaving the country. The article reads that a special operations group was left behind for training. Well, then, why didn’t THEY receive the weapons and vehicles? Supposedly, the order to relinquish arms came directly from the state department. I just got thru watching Jen Pee-saki state that all American material, embassy and belongings will remain intact and in good shape. This being the case for our eventual return. How adolescent are these people? Maybe Obama needs a long, protracted visit to the terrorist war zone to have a real “feel” as to who and what these people are all about. Fire Kerry, lobotomize Pee-saki further, and make Obama play 50 rounds of golf at the Syrian Hilton Resort Club.

This is exactly why I hate and don’t trust polls and surveys. These “scholars” have voted overwhelmingly that Kerry is the worst SOS. Now what I was wondering is why there wasn’t a tie with Clinton for this dubious honor. Because 8.8 percent think Clinton was the most effective. I would say that that alone nullifies the worth of this survey and those scholars involved. Too bad because it had a promising start. (Inject James Taylor’s “You’ve Got A Friend” here)