Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

Census Anyone?

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

by ACTivist

Couple days ago (I’ve been busy-my standard excuse) I received an official government first class letter from the Census Bureau.  You remember when we got those letters saying a stimulus check would be forthcoming and then another letter saying that the stimulus was almost here and then the stimulus check finally came (I guess)?  Kinda like Santa writing you a letter saying he’s coming for Christmas then another letter saying “have you been a good boy/girl?’, getting your hopes up just to find a lump of coal in your stocking for all the hype….which is more than I got from the stimulus.

When Wolf sends me official paid by the taxpayers first class mailings telling me what is going on in the district I think “I pay $40 for internet and am on your e-mail list.  Why did you waste my money?”  Others just throw it out without reading.  Thank goodness Warner and Webb are too afaraid to mail us what they are doing or what they believe in.  At least that saves 44cents per mailing.  “It’s only 44 cents, ACT.  What’s the big deal?”  Okay, let’s extrapolate that.

The census letter states to fill out the census when it comes.  Why couldn’t this go into the same envelope with the census?  Does that “warning” mean that people will cancel vacations and outtings, just sitting around so they can make sure their community gets their “fair share”?  Say 300 million people in America.  Divide by 4 for the number of members to a family (average).  75 million letters times 44 cents is $33,000,000.  But wait.  The letter was addressed to RESIDENT.  I believe that there are 25% more homes than families to occupy them which means that EVERY VACANT HOME will get a census letter.  That would be another $8,250,000.  I won’t even include business addresses because I just don’t know.  We are up to $41,250,000 for just the first mailing.  This does not include the mailing of the census itself and then, probably, an additional reminder to get that census back quickly.  That number could  possibly grow to $123,750,000 or more.  Mind you this is very rough ballpark figures.

Do you see where I am going with this?  There is now $123,750,000 less to distribute of your money to your community because of these mailings.  All for just 44 cents each.  If this was corporate America doing this then it would make “cents” because you have to spend money to make money.  The government spends YOUR money so that it can spend MORE of YOUR money.  I guess it is nothing more than trying to keep the USPS afloat without you knowing about it.  Otherwise, this just doesn’t make “cents” to me.

UPDATE  Watch this video here and be warned!

Zero Earmarks

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

by jacob
Previously in the article “Republican Ideas” I laid out four items that I believe would weld the Republican party a coalition that could win elections. They were

1. Kill the terrorists before they kill us
2. Give us back our money
3. Zero Earmarks
4. Obey all of the Constitution

I am thinking that this list is too complex. It also has the wrong priorities. Therefore I will provide a simpler list:

1. Zero Earmarks
2. Cut Spending

The reason I have shortened the list is that our own deficit is far more destructive that anything the Islamic Trolls can do. Also, taxes, while important are not the root of the evil. When government spending eats up three to five percent of our GDP, as it did the first 150 years our country existed, a bad tax policy is not an issue. When government, Federal-State-Local is easting up over 40% of our GDP as it does today, a good tax policy is not possible.

Earmarks
At all three levels of government we must reduce government spending. This cannot happen until the pork-barrel spending, today referred to as earmarks, is eliminated. Politicians who engage in earmarks should be eliminated during primary season. This of course requires our electorate to focus on what their representatives are doing in Leesburg, Richmond and Washington; in that order.

A simple approach is to ask our current and future representatives at all three levels of government to sign a ‘No Earmarks’ pledge. This forces them to take a position that we can hold them accountable for. I can see a solid man like Tag Greason signing this pledge and living up to it. I cannot imagine any of the current crop of big spenders on our Board of Supervisors signing such a pledge. Refusal to sign the pledge is a statement in itself. One conservatives can use to pummel our BOS into submitting to the will of the people, or to be shown the door on election day.

It is not possible to enact a law that makes earmarks or pork illegal. In a real sense ‘bringing home the bacon’ is a lot like pornography. You really cannot define it, but you know it when you see it.

Spending
We as a nation spend too much. Our government at all three levels spends too much. The issue is not taxes. The issue is spending. If expenditures exceed revenues you are on an unsustainable path. There are no miracles. The state, if it bails out the county is then in the same position, except on a bigger scale. If the Federal government steps in, then it too is in the same fiscally unsustainable position. Raising taxes forever is not a solution either. The Laffer curve shows clearly that once taxes go beyond a given percentage of income, the rate of growth in revenues declines.

Therefore the only choice is to have the courage to cut spending. This requires that the elected politician, at whatever level of government, must have the spine to stand up to the special interests, and reduce spending. Such a stance is not political suicide, such a stance will earn the gratitude of the 40% of the country that is self identified as conservative, and most of the moderates. The 20% of the country that is self identified as liberal will fret and whine; but most conservatives see such and revel in it.

Fiscal Sanity
The road to fiscal sanity requires we as a nation must recognize what is it that government should do, what it can do, and what it should not do. The constitution in Article 1, Section B outlines the 21 activities that are in the purview of the federal government. The 9th and 10th Amendments basically say unless it is specifically permitted, it is forbidden for congress to do. It would serve our nation well if over a period of years we bring the government into line with the Constitution our Congress and President have sworn to uphold.

At the State and local level the problems are both more complex, but easier to fix. First of all the state and local governments have more latitude than the Federal. Therefore pinning them down is harder. However, on the flip side what is the proper role of our state and local government can be restricted more readily by the fact that unlike the Federal government, they cannot print more money.

Responsibility
We as conservatives have a long road ahead of us. The culture is being taught to be dependent on government for things that the people really should be doing for themselves. This is the fault of conservatives. That is correct, it is our fault. The conservative’s motto can be summed up as ‘leave me the hell alone’, the trouble with this mindset is that we have then left the field wide open to those values and world views that are antithetical to liberty. Socialism is slavery, what else can dependence be? We must speak to this reality in the public square, and this must be the guiding principal for all future legislation, and choice of candidates. It may take more than 20 years of fiscal conservative activism to undo the damage of 80 years of progressive rule in our country. While this is daunting, it must be done.

George Will Blasts Democrats & Dependency At CPAC

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

The old war horse has not lost a step. His argument skewers the current administration with a wit devoid of anger, angst and venom. Takes notes people, this is how a conservative message aught to be woven.

- Jacob

The Gay Problem

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Fellow conservatives, are we really having this conversation … Now?

All I can say is: criminy and double criminy. People are off track.

Are gay conservatives a big enough problem to divert attention from our other REALLY SERIOUS problems? I realize this is going to cause some heartburn, but right now I do not care.

To wit: The Obama Administration is talking about confiscating your retirement money and 401k funds

If you haven’t gotten the joke so far, what’s being suggested is that 401K and IRA accounts be converted to fixed-income instruments, and that some portion (or even the entire balance) be allocated to (wait for it) Treasuries.

By all means, read all of that and follow his links.

I don’t know about you. I’ve spent my share of time on public policy debates related to this issue – in the past. But right now is it not evident we have bigger fish to fry and is it not evident we should seek common ground with people who agree with us about clear and present dangers to our lives and futures? Shouldn’t a sense of proportion kick in where we say the debates of 2007 are oh, so three years ago?

Even though I will always oppose special status for self-elevated identity-based interest groups I just can’t stay angry enough about homosexuality to oppose everything gay people do, everywhere, in every instance. So when a “gay” group shows up at a conservative event and the individuals within it are on board with the overarching goals, it just strikes me as insane to be impolite to them.

What the f–k, people? I mean, what the f–k? Is it the case that we are overflowing with sensible folks who will take time to go to a grassroots event and commit to saving our country? Are there really TOO MANY of those comrades in arms? You actually BOO people who show up willing to work?

It makes me sick and it paints the picture of how the road to serfdom becomes a reality for all of us.

Get this: Conservatives can kiss off “Hot Air” blog

Unbelievable. Notions that suggest “cutting nose to spite face” or “selling children to appease resentments”. The issue of the day is not what people do in their bedrooms. The issue is whether we will continue to allow the wealth of our country to be squandered for generations into the future.

YOU ARE GOING TO LOSE YOUR RETIREMENT SAVINGS, DUMBASSES, AND YOU WILL END YOUR LIVES EATING CAT FOOD. There are people willing to stand by you to forestall that future. Do you really want to ensure the former by framing the latter as demons?

Respectfully,

Joe

So what more insanity comes from Obama?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

How about the interest on the debt coming to $5000 per person? Forbes is one of the most respected financial magazines of our time, and when you see that they are saying, you have to wonder how long does this country have. If they don’t get a clue in DC, your children (not grandchildren) will either be living in a different country, or they will be slaves to the rest of the world. The opening paragraph I will quote here:

Early last week the administration unveiled its new $3.8 trillion budget. This budget, and the spending it assumes, is so reckless it is difficult to fathom. It projects a deficit of $1.6 trillion for fiscal 2010, with an explosion of publicly traded government debt to $18.5 trillion by 2020. Debt service is projected to reach $912 billion a year by 2020, or over $5,000 for every working person in America.

I encourage you to go to the site in the link above and read the whole thing (what else can you do today with all this snow). It will help depress you and make you want to throw the bum out.

Like it or not? You have got to be kidding!

Monday, February 8th, 2010

When I read this, I thought “You have got to be kidding me”. Either this guys is pure stupid, is dangerous beyond belief, or just doesn’t read what his speeches say prior to giving them (which implies incompetent, but we already knew that). The part that is most salient is:

“Like it or not, we have to have a financial system that is healthy and functioning,”

So our president thinks that we might not like having a financial system that is healthy and functioning. The connotation of the phrase “like it or not” is that even though the thing being spoken of is negative, wrong or evil, it is necessary. So our president believes a healthy and functioning financial system is not a good thing. 2012 can’t come quickly enough.

Obama supporters, are you embarrassed by him yet? I’m beyond embarrassed at this point, and I didn’t even vote for him (though he is an embarrassment to every American). I’d suggest he ought to resign, but that would put the worst succession of power chain up that anyone could imagine (Biden … yuck, Palosi … even worse). At least Obama is incapable of getting things done … the damage will be limited while he is in office.

Simple Series #2-Economics.

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

I didn’t know how to post the picture so you don’t get to see it. I got out the crayons and paper again for those lead-headed individuals that just can’t seem to grasp reality. It doesn’t get more simple than this.

An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had once failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama’s socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer..
The professor then said, “OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama’s plan”. All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A….
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little. The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.

The by-product from this message has to do with competition, which is healthy and necessary for a good economy and personal drive. One thing I can tell you for sure: this professor would never be allowed to teach at Harvard!

Wonder why your mail is not being delivered?

Monday, February 1st, 2010

[Well serious journalistic style blogging is still not going to be my stock in trade this time of year folks because I just don't have the time. So let this serve as my preemptive apology to all who have been needling me to write stuff and may be saying, "Hey, how come Joe has time to write THIS silly blog post when he won't write the important one I've been asking for for months?!" Sorry about that, but as I've noted before, for $3500 a week with a written guarantee of 90 weeks I WILL be your huckleberry, I promise, but not until then. 'Kay?]

So. What has inspired us to take time out of our busy schedule to sit down and write an original blog post today?

What has inspired us is a series of events that combines a number of my pet issues; including horrific customer service, the United States Postal Service, and bad marketing which is so bad that those who perpetrate it should be stoned, by which I do NOT mean invited into your condo for some musty Hawaiian doobage, but rather tied to the lamppost and struck with bricks until dead.

Some of my commentary here will allude to the employees of the United States Postal Service which, to me, is an overly wordy allusion, so let’s just create a shorthand reference here and call them “Cocksuckers.”

Anyways back in early December I took the initiative to send Christmas cards this year, which with work and personal is a LOT of Christmas cards (and for all of you who did not get one from me, just imagine how huge my contact base must be if YOU did not even make it onto the list. I am talking LEGIONS of Christmas card recipients here.)

A couple of my cards came back, for lack of postage. This is odd, because I double check my stamps before dropping letters in the mail box the same way Rain Man double checks his socks before depositing them in the dresser drawer. There is no way I left off a stamp. Then, in a conversation with a local friend, I heard she had cards come back because the new “holiday” USPS stamps fell off. Well, that made perfect sense to me, because the glue on those stamps did seem flimsy, and as I said I never forget to include a stamp.

The cards that came back had a red ink stamped notice “Returned for lack of postage, when remailing cross out this notice or place stamps over it” where the stamp would have been. So I put on a new stamp and re-mailed. Unfortunately, the re-stamped cards came back.

Charge to Joe so far by the Cocksuckers: 88 cents each and still no delivery.

The next stage in this drama took place last week when I needed to send out the month’s bills, and was also sitting on over $30 worth of the USPS “Holiday” stamps each with an angel’s breath worth of adhesion waiting to surrender to the elements. So I wrote out all the checks and sealed the envelopes and applied my “Holiday” stamps each with a tiny piece of transparent tape holding the stamp onto the envelope by the lower portion.

Lo and behold, today the first of these bill payments came back to me, with a red ink stamp by the Cocksuckers stating “Stamps void when coated, covered, defaced or reused. Return for postage.”

Thus I can expect all of my 20 or so payments to come back, many of which will be late by the time I re-package and resend, and some of which may never be received since I don’t have much faith in the Cocksuckers to really care about whether these are returned in a timely manner. The first which I received back today was to a charity, and some of them were specifically for Haiti, so there you go: The US Government refusing to accept posted instruments which each displayed completely verifiably paid transit costs, returned for the good old government excuse: I shall screw you over because I can, because I work for the government.

Note it should make no difference to the Cocksuckers at USPS. Obviously the stamps have been paid for, and obviously the only reason for putting a piece of tape is because they have been falling off. I get nothing out of having to add extra adhesion. These people are simply looking for a reason to refuse to deliver my letters. Letters arrive wet, they arrive spindled or mutilated, and the USPS ostensibly tries to deliver each. But with their crappy Holiday stamps they take the opportunity to use the little piece of tape as a reason to send it back.

Thanks a lot, Cocksuckers.

The key takeaway from this is, in my view: Never buy anything from the US Government that you don’t absolutely HAVE to buy. Holiday stamps are a total waste of money, and I will end up trashing over $30 in stamps because I was stupid enough to buy them from the Cocksuckers at the USPS.

Also, DO NOT SEND ANYTHING VIA THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE IF YOU CAN SEND IT ANOTHER WAY.

This is like Obama Motors, friends. Just like you should never, ever buy a car from Chrysler or GM ever again, you should make a full scale effort to avoid doing business with the Cocksuckers at USPS.

Here is a useful vignette for those of you who live in Sterling Park: Go to Costco. On the wall between the food court and the employee cafeteria is a whiteboard listing the sheer efficiency ratings of Costco employees. It’s purely numbers: How many customers was each Costco employee able to check out. Some of them are amazing, and you experience this when you go through the line at Costco, Their job is to do their job and they are very, very good at it.

Compare this to the Sterling Post Office, where more often than not the employee mission seems to be to make each transaction last as long as possible so as to ensure the minimum number of potential customers are served during the course of a day. These are the Cocksuckers whose salary you are paying, and who go out of their way to make your life difficult and, if you were stupid enough to purchase their Holiday stamps, to keep your letters from arriving at the intended destinations. They find ways to avoid delivering your mail, costing you money and costing the people you want to pay money, while also skimming money from your pocketbook the whole time.

Pay your bills online, spend a little more to send your packages with Fed Ex or UPS, and help put the Cocksuckers at USPS out of business.

And throw away those Holiday stamps, they are useless and you have been had.

Free Markets V. Government Spending

Friday, January 29th, 2010

The argument between free and planned economies is not new …

The trouble is that Keynes was a libertarian when compared to any the socialists, from Mao to Mussolini. Hippies want to eliminate differences in wealth. Keynes just sought a solution to the boom-bust cycle.

Two quotes by Hayek that I find to be spot on given today’s political fads…

“A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.”

“‘Emergencies’ have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.”
Friedrich August von Hayek

Never waste a good crises either. Remember Obama’s little quip when talking to some bald plumber dude?

Spread the wealth around!! Obama is gonna make us all equal, miserably so.

Why This Administration Must Also Fail.

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Jack has been harping on this topic religiously and he gets it as others here do. I got out my crayons and paper so that everyone can get it. Take 10 minutes of your time without regret. We’re going back to school!

School = free
Pre-requisite = a brain with cognative thought processes
Video = 10 minutes
Topic = our government system
Understanding = priceless
Liberal comprehension about our Founding father’s model = ZERO!

Watch video here.

I learned one thing for sure. It appears that in actuality, I am a friggin’ moderate. Oh, Dan; the irony of it all. HA.

Obama Seeks To Enact Austerity Measures – After November

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

You cannot make this stuff up. Obama is in effect saying, “After we are done trying to buy the next election, we stop sending the electorates money.” OK. No worries. Really. You go right ahead. We believe you. Could you please take the ‘kick me’ sign off my back when you are done.

From the Politico:

Trying to win the votes of fiscal moderates, President Barack Obama formally endorsed legislation Saturday creating an independent commission with the power to force Congress to vote on major deficit reduction steps this year, after the November elections.

This is supposed to add momentum to our sagging economy? The public is rolling it eyes at the President. This act stopped being cute a long time ago. I think the President and his friends, Harry and Nancy need to take a time out and a nap. Seriously. The public is not buying the whole ‘Democrats are fiscally frugal’ shtick. The did for about a month around the election, but that was 16 months ago.

The congress and the White house have become a sort of Socialists Romp-a-room. This is where old hippies, who now wear suits go to ’stick it to the man’. News flash to the hippies, they are the man. The spending bill enacted last winter is producing jobs, at the rat of some $400 per job. Some $500B remains unspent. A better idea idea would be to give the money back. Reduce the decifict, and lower taxes. Hippies are good for backing hash laced brownies, not economic thinking.

This crowd is even worse than the previous bunch when it comes to treating the voting public like fools. A commission in November to cut spending? The last time the Obama team went through this exercise it was determined that we need a better way to buy office supplies. A better idea is to bring our spending in line with what is permissible under Article 1 sec 8 of the Constitution. I say, “Austerity Now – Death to Earmarks!!”

Another Increase For LCPS

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

The school board doesn’t get it. The BOS doesn’t get it. The liberal spend all citizens don’t get it. Everyone is so worried that our “schools” will be inferior to everyone elses schools so we must spend more and have all the new gadgets, new architecture, new buses, new this and new that. Bullshit!

To all of you lame ass empty headed people out there that subscribe to this tripe I’ll tell you what. If YOU want it then YOU pay for it. You need 3 things for a good education and take one away and you have nothing.

First you need a good teacher wanting..no..passionate about teaching.
Second you need nothing but the truth in subject matter.
Third, and most important, you need a WILLING and RECEPTIVE mind.

With those 3 things you could hold class in a barn, a hospital, an old football stadium or even out in the woods. It ain’t the building or the environment. And if you really want to learn or as parents have your kids educated well, you don’t worry about the transportation issue. Good golly, get a grip!

Think of it this way. Imagine being able to go to trade school FREE with the promise that you could get any job you wanted. No sports schlorships with a risky chance of making it to the big shows. A real career that would be both satisfying and rewarding. Wouldn’t you do whatever it took to make that happen? Then make it happen. We do need common laborers in this country and an education is not necessary. Cut funding, re-use existing buildings standing vacant, pay teachers who want to teach MORE and grade them yearly on their students achievements, and parents; teach your children responsibility. The real world is out there and if they don’t do it on their own, I sure as hell don’t want to do it for them!

End sermon.

LCDC Chair Tim Buchholz’ Day Job “Supporting the 2009 Recovery Program”

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Loudoun County Democratic Committee Chair Tim Buchholz has been employed since March 2009 with a contractor

Providing consulting services for the Office of Risk Management, Office of the CFO, Department of Energy. Supporting the 2009 Recovery Program.

Good for Tim, being employed that is. With Obama at the helm, any job should be considered a good job.

tim_buchholz
However, in light of the effort by Supervisor McGimsey to put Loudoun taxpayers on the hook for a new “energy plan” justified in part by the promise of federal dollars from the 2009 Recovery Act, it is worth asking whether Democrat Party Chair Buchholz has played any role as cheerleader for the Loudoun energy plan or as liaison between this county and the federal government.

Since he works for a contractor his role as LCDC chair likely does not rise to the level of a Hatch Act question, but because he is being paid to “support” the 2009 Recovery Act under the Department of Energy aegis it seems fair to say Loudoun taxpayers have a right to know what role, if any, he has played in supporting our “energy strategy.” It’s not necessarily a matter of conflict of interest, but simply the public’s right to know who all is in the pipeline to make this energy plan happen.

Transition to a Service Economy

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

An editorial in the Washington Times by Alan Tonelson, Is Obama’s manufacturing fix too late?, focuses on our diminishing manufacturing capacity. Tonelson is “a research fellow at the U.S. Business and Industry Council, a national business organization whose nearly 1,900 members are mainly small- and medium-sized domestic manufacturers.” Naturally, he is concerned about our manufacturing capacity.

However, we are transitioning away from a manufacturing-based economy to a service-based economy, and that is not so bad a thing. Many years ago, we moved from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing economy. That transition was painful for many, as most transitions are. But in general, it was a good thing.

Let us take a look at a mythical village, as its economy evolves. First, basic needs must be met. Food, water, and shelter. So, we locate our village where there is water, building materials, and cropland. We plant our crops, build our houses and barns, and dig our wells. Well, clothing would certainly be nice, so the women spin yarn and thread from the lambs’ wool, weave cloth, and sew clothes. Perhaps they make jackets and shoes of leather. Some are better at spinning than sewing, or better at knitting than weaving. Division of labor arises, as does trade between the women. The same occurs with the farmers. Some cropland is better for corn, some for wheat, and some for vegetables. So the farmers grow what they best can and trade for what others do better.

Things are going so well with this division of labor that not everyone is needed to grow food. But this prosperity has a downside. Farmers are going out of business because there is too much food. Some whine and complain, others become full-time manufacturers — cobblers, coopers, smiths, carpenters, etc. Still others become merchants — the middlemen between the farmers and manufacturers. This last group is the start of what Adam Smith called “unproductive labor.” He did not mean this in any pejorative sense, only that they did not produce anything. What they do is free up those who do produce so that they can produce more instead of spending their time trading what they produce for what they need or want.

Still others go into the service business. They cut your hair, give you a shave, shine your shoes, etc. There may not be any time-savings involved, but a pedicure sure is nice sometimes.

As our village increases productivity and population, more and more stuff is produced. The village produces plenty of food. Our villagers are getting obese! The general store (run by Sam Walton, of course), carries everything we need or want. Our village has grown to a town, but because of increased productivity, our one cobbler can still produce all the shoes we need, and our one blacksmith can still provide all of the horseshoes our horses need. So what will their children do for work? Some will invent more stuff that we decidee we need. Some will build and maintain storage for our stuff. But the majority will earn their living as servants.

This is not a bad thing, any more than it was bad for farmers to become manufacturers. Many people would rather have that pedicure every month, or have their house cleaned by someone else, than have more stuff.

We need only produce enough food to feed us, and stuff to satisfy our desires. Tonelson is focused on the stuff aspect of wealth, not the comfort aspect. It is a comfort not to have to clean one’s own house. So if one person in ten produces all the food we need, and a second all the stuff we need, what’s the problem with the other eight of us serving one another?

The Real Enemy of Freedom

Monday, December 21st, 2009

This is the face of the true enemy of freedom in this country.

The Democrats have decided that any semblance of debate regarding the facts of any topic is too much trouble. Instead rank name calling is the order of the day. There was a time when this sort of thing was done by activists in order to rabble rouse. Now the party is cutting out the middleman, and Democrat Senators are engaging in empty, banal, name calling — on the floor of the senate.

If you are against the government take over of 1/6th of the economy, you are a racist. Really? If you are against a 2000 page bill getting voted on w/o anyone taking the time to understand what is involved, you are a member of the Aryans? The second worst thing that can happen to the Democrats is failure to pass this bill. The worst thing is them succeeding in this kleptocratic effort.  This mess is that bad.

The bill is unconstitutional. The federal government does not have the power to force people to buy a product. The 14th amendment demands that federal laws apply equally to all individuals. That means the amendment to the H.C .bill where Nebraska is exempt from paying in perpetuity its share of the Federal Health care is unconstitutional on its face. Noting the blatant illegality of this bill, and the fraud it is perpetrating on the American people will no doubt be called racist, homophobic, bigoted, fattening and will cause the polar ice caps to melt.  The correct answer to this level of debate is, “I know you are, but what am I?!”

The best part of this is that we now have it in the congressional record that the Democrats have crafted a bill to kill the insurance industry.  They denied it at first, and wrapped their rhetoric in business model talk — cost savings, consumer choice etc.  Lying through their teeth they claimed this is a market based  solution.  How can that be if you are killing the market?  Oh!  Is that question racist?