Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

Scott Ott Gets It

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Scott Ott, a conservative blogger and news satirist, gets the contradiction that every conservative active in politics must live with.  The following list is the resume for a politician who will uphold freedom.

We need politicians who see a problem and think…

1. How can government diminish its role as the cause of that problem?
2. What will happen if government does nothing about it?
3. How can we remove impediments to private-sector solutions?
4. How can we enhance individual responsibility, and thus, human dignity
?

For the rest of the article go here.

Public Service – A Republican Perspective

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

When Rome was a Republic, selfless public service was considered a a virtue, if not a requirement.  “For the good of the nation!”, men of talent stepped forward and built Rome into a powerful nation from a motley set of villages atop seven hills.   Everyone served in the military, many served in public works, some served in the Senate and its supporting bureaucracy.  Cinncinatus, while human, was an example by which many of the founders of our country lived:

His [Cinncinatus] immediate resignation of his absolute authority with the end of the crisis has often been cited as an example of outstanding leadership, service to the greater good, civic virtue, and modesty.

Washington followed this creed, as did the members of the continental army who followed Washington.  Our country was blessed by Washington’s stepping away from the presidency after two terms.  This was a tradition that was not broken until the progressive FDR — masquerading as a Democrat — selfishly felt the country needed him for four terms.   Unfortunately, selflessness in public service today is not a virtue followed by many, if any at all.  Congress follows Roosevelt’s not Washington’s model.  We are poorer for it.

I believe that the military (Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force) should remain all volunteer. What we could do, as a nation, is enforce a 2 year period of service. This could include firefighting, nursing, BORDER patrol, coast guard, prison guard, EMT, CUSTOMS inspection etc, etc. Unlike the draft earlier in mid-twentieth century, all would serve.  No exceptions.  No waivers for those in college, nor for a medical condition.  No exceptions.  For example, a paraplegic could answer phones in an emergency call center.

The Military would require 4 years of service, two is not enough for a modern force.  Military service would still be voluntary.  A battery of aptitude tests, both academic and athletic,  would put the incoming eighteen year old’s on scale.  Those with the highest scores would get first pick.  The Military could very well itself get an inductee class that is better than ever.

As the choice of assignment is based on merit, the better assignments would go to the more adept.  Military, EMT, nursing, and other choice positions would go to those who scored well.  Guarding the Alaska-Yukon border would go to those at the bottom of the barrel.

Think of the benefits outside the military arena.  Currently we cannot inspect every ship, and every container coming into the country.  With a manpower pool in the 7M range, this issue would to go away.  Considering the repercussions of a nuclear weapon coming into port and detonating, such a force is warranted.  Considering the fallout of finally being able to really stop the flow of drugs coming into the country, such service would also be highly beneficial.

Service to the country is a republican ideal, not a Republican ideal.  This country is a Republic,  we would be well served to remember that.

Janet Napolitano, “Watch Out For Muslims”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Janet is worried about Muslims.  In her bizarre world Muslims are the targets of White, Christian oppression here in our country.  Muslims are also the targets of attack by returning veterans according to dear Janet.

It requires a level of unimaginable blind hate to level such broad, vile accusations at these two groups.  The first is statistically the most peaceful in the country and the least likely to carry out an attack against anyone.  The veterans, are statistically more likely than some other groups to be involved in a legal incident, however, when one considers their service they are worthy of praise, to target them as potential domestic terrorists is a national betrayal.

Christian killings of abortion doctors, a liberal bugaboo, numbers 6 incidents and 9 deaths.  Muslim based violence, killing in the name of Allah, in this country alone the body count is 3000+.  When taken in its totality across the globe, it runs into the tens of thousands.  909 in the month of October, 2009 alone — and counting!  From the attack by a Muslim on a military recruiting station, to the Muslim trying to run students over at a college campus, to 9/11 — every reason is explored, “for why they hate us?“   The better question is what will it take to make them stop, aside from a mass national conversion to Islam.  But dear Janet is worried.  What are returning vets, gun owners, Christians and Republican going to do to the Muslims in America?

Janet Napolitano is part of the problem.  The political correctness of the DHS and the ARMY is ridiculous.  This PC mentality is what allowed Nidal Malik Hasan to remain in the Army even though he espoused violence against non-believers — and the army knew about it.  Hasan was in contact with an Iman with known contacts to Al Quaeda.  Why?  Because the policy since Napolitano has been to announce worries over Christian conservatives with known links to the NRA?  Of a rise in militias?  After the killing of 13 of our soldiers at Ft. Hood, Janet announces her big worry:

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday’s rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan

The woman has got it backward.  Following Janet’s lead, MSM is looking for any reason for the shootings other than that  Hasan was a Muslim terrorist.  Only 23% of the initial coverage mentioned that Hasan was Muslim and 93% of the reports failed to call this an act of terrorism, until Obama hinted it might be.  So on top of the press willful blindness, it is still the president’s lap dog.  Until the fourth estate, MSM wing,  stops carrying water for the Democrat party the hyper-PC foolishness will continue and Americans will continue to die.

McDonnell Touts His Conservatism

Monday, November 9th, 2009

McDonnell conducted an excellent interview with Chris Wallace this Sunday.  During the course of this interview McDonnell was unapologetic about how his campaign was conservative across the spectrum, in both the fiscal and cultural arenas.  It was surprising to see an elected  Republican this conservative in public.

The campaigns that McDonnell and Cuccinelli conducted here in VA should be a blue print for the Republicans in 2010.  These Virginia Republican campaigns focused on jobs, economic development, and transportation.  The campaigns also avoided making negative personal attacks on their opponents, unlike their Democrat opponents, who focused on such negative ads.  Instead, the Republican message focused on a positive outlook based on what were detailed solutions for a campaign.  While this was not mentioned in the interview, the Republican campaigns also effectively answered the attack ads of their intellectually bankrupt opponents.

McDonnell also acknowledged how national events played into the Republicans’ favor:  card check, out-of-control spending in Washington, unfunded mandates, and cap-and-trade, a.k.a the energy tax.  These issues energized the the Republican base across the nation.  It reminded small and large businesses why socialist solutions lead to economic ruin.

McDonnell’s running mate on the ticket, Ken Cuccinelli, never flinches from his conservative views and is often the spear tip of conservative legislation. Ken not only is a conservative, he sponsors conservative legislation. I was very pleasantly surprised to hear McDonnell answer questions in a similar vein with regard to his conservatism.  McDonnell was direct, honest and unapologetic.  When asked by Wallace what is the bigger message in order for the party as a whole to get healthy again, McDonnell replied, “Stick to your conservative principals but focus on quality of life issues.”  Kudos!

McDonnell’s message targeted fiscal conservatism.  This was an abandoned ideal, and I have not heard many Republicans explain it well in the past few years.  Listening to some Republicans discuss fiscal responsibility is akin to Democrats misapplying bible quotes or bungling economic theory.    When someone does not understand the underlying principles, they mangle the message.  McDonnell was sure footed in this area; hopefully he will govern as well as he campaigned.

McDonnell stated recently that he will govern as he campaigned. When asked what this meant, he said that the dominant campaign themes will be the priorities of his governance of Virginia.  The economic state of VA demands this.  However, without Wallace’s prodding, McDonnell went on to announce that he is pro-life and pro-family, and he will defend both.  When pointedly asked how he will manage the needs social conservatives in the party, he returned to the list of economic issues as his first concern; but, he also added that protection of families, fatherhood, and educational choices were also part of his platform.   He clearly claimed his message was conservative throughout.  How nice not to hear that smarmy refrain, “BUT, I am a moderate on <pick an issue>.”

McDonnell said he wants to cuts spending.  When asked about cutting Planned Parenthood off from state funds, McDonnell stated point blank that people do not want tax payer funding going to abortion services, and that should be the state policy.  McDonnell stated that the death penalty should be expanded to all those involved in the murder of someone during the commission of a crime; and, unlike his Democrat predecessor, he would sign, not veto, this legislation.  McDonnell is against Obamacare.  McDonnell said point blank that he would finish his term as governor and not get distracted by other pursuits, unlike our current governor.

This is one of the better interviews by a politician I have heard in many years. It was impressive because the Governor was frank and touted his conservatism.  Wallace was able to cover a lot of ground because McDonnell answered the question as it was posed, not veering into some smarmy talking point.  McDonnell and Cuccinelli deserve the support of conservatives, until they demonstrate they deserve otherwise.  If McDonnell continues in this conservative vein, it will bode well for our great State.

Protestors Marching In DC on 9/12

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

This is the astro-turf in DC last Saturday. Note the scripted singing of strange and obscure songs.

Dawn Of the Democrats

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Democrat Party Leadership Calls Protests Un-American

Monday, August 10th, 2009

Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer wrote op-eds in US Today that called those who protest the Obama-care take over of the medical industry in the United States Un-American.  Regardless of whether you support or protest Obama-care this should be seen as outrageous.  The Republican Congressional leadership, and the Bush White House never attacked citizens of this country in this way.

Partizan hacks who level this accusation abound on both sides of the political divide.  They have a role to play, albeit a dubious role.  Robust discussion is a must for a Republic such as ours to survive.  This is not small potatoes.  I am sure the kool-aid drinking left will by and large level the tired and sorry charge of ‘but they do it too’!  But the charge that is not true.  The Republican speaker of the house never called those who protested Bush’s policies Un-American.  The previous President never told them to shut up.

This is the elected political leadership of the party in power.   Obama, with his flag@whitehouse.com and Pelosi and Hoyer with their op-Ed’s that are engaging in what is an attempt to chill public dialogue.  That is very different from some opinion writer or blogger doing the same.  It is orders of magnitude worse.  It is something that is not some yahoo blowing off steam, this is political leaderhsip — who have a responsibility to the country — engaging in what should be a private conversation amoung partisan supporters of a political philosophy.

The lack of restraint on the part of Obama and Pelosi is stunning.  Go look up on youtube Bush’s response to Sheehan protesting him.  Bush’s response is worlds apart from Obama’s, and obviously lost on the modern left.  The modern Democrat has become a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.  The take over of the auto-industry is illegal; as is the take over of the Banking industry.  TARP was illegal.  The 40 Czars are illegal.  Maybe it is time to recognize this criminality.  Maybe winning the argument is not the only thing.  This will not be forgotten.  Maybe it is time to hold all of our leadership both red and blue to some standard, and terminate their political careers when they run off the reservation.

A Single Payer Option Is The Democrats Goal

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

The goal of all the Democrat’s health care initiative is the government take over of the entire health care industry. They have said it over and over again. One only needs to find them speaking in front of the right people. This has come from many different voices in the congress, the White House, and elsewhere in the Democrat party. Ignore this take over at your peril.

Government managed health care has not worked in Hawaii, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, or California. We have Canadian and British citizens coming here — not the reverse.  Ever wonder why? Getting pills is not treatment.  Those pills originated in the US, ‘big pharma’ in this country is still inventing new drugs.  Look at all of Europe, and Canada — their pharmaceutical research is a fraction of what we do.  Does this give you pause?

We do far better when we get cancer or heart disease with regard to survival rates.  Ever wonder why?  The WHO scores us poorly because we do not have de jour universal coverage.  In the categories that have something to do with medical treatment we are on top.  Think about that.  We are scored poorly because some bureaucrat thinks we are not fair.  Who decides what is fair?  No one elected the paper pushers at the WHO.  Why do they get to decide what is fair?

The more the government gets involved, the greater the costs — unless you ration via long waiting lists, which lower survival rates.  The Democrats, with Obama on point, are not going to tell you the truth. The truth is that HR3200 already has parts that are designed to phase out private insurance. Supporters of the Democrat party, do you like your insurance? Think. Being a yellow dog Democrat is not going to help you or the country. Call your congressman, call your Senator, write a letter to the local paper.

The nature of government is that it grows more corrupt the bigger it gets. This fact is inescapable.  No government ever has defied this reality.   Think about how much bigger the government is going to get when this happens.  Think how corrupt our Government is already.  Think.

India Says ‘Pass’ On The Green Kool-Aid

Sunday, July 19th, 2009

Hillary Clinton, Obama’s top diplomat was told by India to go pound sand.  Given the current data, Obama’s green energy ideal is something the Indians will do without.  With Europe back pedaling from Kyoto as fast as they can.  One can only wonder about the Democrats obsession with green energy and carbon caps.

India on Sunday night rebuffed an appeal by Hillary Clinton, US secretary of state, to embrace a low-carbon future in which the two countries would work together to devise new ways of consuming and producing energy.

I guess that whole stay poor so you can be greenjust is not working out for the Indians.  Given that India is still suffering from pre-industrial poverty they are just not getting the enviro-whacko vision to go straight to post-industrial poverty.  In case you are wondering, post-industrial poverty is where we in the U.S. are heading.  Look at Waxman’s Cap and Trade industry killer of a bill.

“Adversely affected employees in oil, coal and other fossil-fuel sector jobs would qualify for a weekly check worth 70 percent of their current salary for up to three years. In addition, they would get $1,500 for job-search assistance and $1,500 for moving expenses from the bill’s ‘climate change worker adjustment assistance’ program, which is expected to cost $4.2 billion from 2011 to 2019.”

According to P. Roff of US News:

Instead of being a the source of millions of new jobs of “green jobs”—as House Democrats are fond of saying over and over again—the provision is a hidden admission that their effort is a job killer, not just a massive new tax on energy.

uscompetiveness.gif

The Indians and the Chinese are looking to first achieve some post industrial wealth and decadence.  This wealth and decadence are what all those nasty dead white people achieved in the past 250 years. It was by their blood sweat and tears that we saw in past 70 years the elimination of starvation and disease in this great land.

If you are wondering what post industrial wealth and decadence looks like, recall the late 20th century United States.  We saw the average home size in 1950 to 2005 go from less than 600 sq. ft. to 3000 sq. ft.  You know, like the whole McMansion disgustingly large homes of NOVA.  Us wealthy hoi polloi have no business being so wealthy.  We are the upstarts the current Duke of Wales, Charles Windsor, is so upset about.  He claims the world will come to an end in 99 months due to our consumption of energy and resources.  This consumption must be drastically curtailed.  He then flew off in his private jet.

What are us non-elites thinking?  You know, according to Charles and the rest of our betters its our place in life to live in near starvation while toiling in the fields.   We are supposed to live in 300 sq. ft. hovels with little heat and absolutely no air conditioning.  Nowadays we also bathe everyday,  the great masses are supposed to unwashed.

In some places when the industrial age and the associated wealth wants to come to town, the enviro-whackos show up, file suit in the world court and claim the multinational economic offer will destroy the local culture.  According to the enviro-whackos the local culture is poverty, that’s their place in life.  Read Eco-Imperialism and you will get the point.

The Green movement is about control, not the environment.  The data shows that the global temperature index is more a function of solar and volcanic activity than human enterprise.  But why let data get in the way of a good ideal?  Al Gore is the high priest of carbon credits.  He owns the company.  He will make a mint.  GE- they bring good things to life – is heavily invested in green energy.  They also control NBC.  Control and greed.  These are two of the real drivers behind the enviro-whacko movement.  The useful idiots are just window dressing.

Where Will Iran Go?

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

The events of the past week have marked the end of the Islamic Revolution in Iran.  Does this mean the regime of the Mullahs will end tomorrow?  No.  However this is the utter end of Iran’s regime being seen by its own people, let alone the rest of the world, as a force or blueprint for expanding Islamic rule.

It appears the neocons where correct after all in this regard – all people want freedom.  To be able to choose ones leadership is a right that is universally sought after, despite protestation of the anti-neocons to the contrary.   In the eastern bloc, millions took to the streets to make this ideal a reality as did thousands in China, India, and elsewhere in the world.

A Spent Ideology
In Iran, the desire for the right to choose ones leadership was made apparent when hundreds of thousands took to the streets to protest what was obviously a rigged election.  The people who did this, did so in the face of a brutal, thuggish Islamo-Fascist regime.  These people ’spoke to power’ when it mattered.  They put their lives on the line, unlike the fools who do so here and claim heroism, the actions of the Iranians has been truly heroic.

Like Marxist-Leninism in the eastern bloc in the 80’s, the Iranian revolution in the 21st Century is truly spent.  Thirty years of sharia law has only made western culture all the more alluring.  The imposed cultural wasteland that is Islam has not created a new generation of Islamic zealots.  Instead it has created a generation of secular Persians.  This younger generation is not enamored of the Mullahs; it despises them for they are corrupt, brutal and narrow.  The younger generation is not seeking to export the Islamic revolution, it seeks to be able to import designer jeans.  Much like the youth in the eastern bloc did back in the 70’s and 80’s.

Crossroads
So which path?  Will the Iranians go the way of China or Romania?  In China the communist party made some key reforms in the 70’s that have to this point allowed them to keep power even in the face of the Tianamin Square massacre.  Market reforms have brought wealth to the country. This wealth has allowed the government to stay in power, despite its fundamentally totalitarian nature.

With the market reforms wealth came to China.  The young have their designer jeans, can go out to night clubs and enjoy many other creature comforts we take for granted here in the West.  One of the big drivers in Iran is the economic failings of the central government.  In China the workers are able to get their crust of bread; that is not a small thing.

Iran is one of the largest oil exporters in the world, but they need nuclear power?  Iran, under the Shah, had educated its population, this has carried over into the Republic.  Despite an educated populous, the standard of living in Iran has declined under the Mullahs.  In China the standard of living has improved the past 30 years.  In Romania the standard of living plummeted under its totalitarian socialist regime. The Romanian regime did not survive its bout of unrest at the end of the cold war.

In China, some freedoms where granted in order to keep the pot from boiling over.  Western pop cultural was allowed to enter.  People were allowed to travel.  People were allowed to conduct business, and manage their own affairs.  Though there are still many problems in China, the ambitious, the energetic have been given an outlet.  An unfortunate side effect of all this activity is that the Chinese regime is now swimming in money.  Money it uses to expand its military and to maintain control over the country.

In Romania the Ceaucescu regime reacted to the worsening economic conditions by tightening controls on economic activity and personal freedom.  The end result there was the death of the regime and its leadership.

Hole Cards
The Mullahs have two hole cards. Their regime still has its Basij Militia, and its Revolutionary Guard.  These are the Brown Shirts and SS of the Iranian regime.  The reason they are the hole cards is that unlike the security forces in the socialist regimes of the 20th century, these thugs are still inspired by their beliefs in an Islamic world government.  The socialist credos of the 20th century did not wear well.  If one looked in the eastern bloc and in China one would be hard pressed to find a revolutionary zealot, wild eyed and ready to preach Marxism to the masses.  To find such a nut, must travel to Chicago or some university campus in the West.

So long as the Mullahs have this base they can hold on to power.  If these two groups begin to question the Islamic oligarchy, then the edifice will certainly crumble.  One wild card is the reaction of the Army to the thuggish behavior of the militias.  It appears for now the Mullahs have kept the army in check. For a totalitarian regime to continue, there needs to be a corps ready to inflict violence on the restive masses; the Mullahs for now still have their power base.

Going Forward
China has managed this feat by keeping the masses less restive as noted above, and injecting a new rational into its cause: Chinese Nationalism.  The Chinese secret police and other security organs are believers in an ascendant China. For now the regime there has managed to align itself with the vision of an economically and militarily expansionist China. Which is why they are growing their military to the tune of 10-15% a year and are making exclusive economic deals with anyone willing to sell them raw materials.

The Mullahs do not have that avenue for two reasons. The first is that Persian nationalism is distinctly non-Islamic in nature. The second is that unlike China, Iran is an economic basket case. The future is not certain for Islamic Republic. The question going forward for the Mullahs is will the government reform or will it try to wield its soon to be gained nuclear power. The first choice, may take the Mullahs down a path were they may survive. The second is akin to that of an angry three year old with a loaded pistol; akin to the disaster in North Korea.  The question for the West is weather it will allow another pistol to become loaded.

Assasination v. Hate Crime

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

The murder of Dr. Tiller was the textbook definition of an assassination.  It is a crime for which there is no excuse, and is appalling.  The murder of the Pvt. William A. Long, a soldier outside an Arkansas recruiting station, was the textbook definition of a hate crime.  It is also a crime for which there is no excuse, and is also appalling.  Scott Roeder, the alleged assassin, picked his target because of what he did – killed the unborn past the 20th week.  Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad allegedly picked his targets because of what they are – soldiers in the U.S. Army.

The assassination received over ten times as much press coverage as the hate crime.  Why is this? The coverage of  Matthew Shephard was even more extensive.  Are abortionists ten times more valuable than soldiers?  Are gay men ten times more valuable than straight?  What is driving the outcry in one case but the relative silence in the other?

Why is the president’s response so different? From the Weekly Standard, the following contrast shows what is valuable in Obama’s world:

“I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe.”

The above was in reference to the murder of an American soldier by a Muslim on his personal Jihad.  The following was in reference to the murder of an abortionist:

I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.

The tone could not be more different.  The murder of a soldier in the name of a violent religion is not heinous?  Islamists commit over 2000 acts of violence per year on unarmed civilians.  That is a world wide pandemic, it is not senseless, it is the purposeful act of terrorizing those who do not submit, and that is certainly heinous.  One miserable lunatic breaks the 6th Commandment targeting an abortion doctor and the liberal media makes political hay over it.  The president, whose voting record on abortion is solidly in the NARAL/NOW camp, joins in the fray.  This is cowardice and opportunism on many planes.

All lives are precious.  It appears Obama holds some in higher regard than others.  It appears that in Obama’s world view, and in the world view of the press, abortionists deserve more outrage than soldiers.  It appears in Obama’s worldview that a single pathetic loon deserves more attention than the 1284 Muslims who attacked people outside of Iraq and Afghanistan — and in the US.  The single doctor is the victim of a heinous act.  Killing 5061 people world-wide in 2008 alone in the name of the ‘religion of peace’ is just senseless?

Where is the outrage for the soldiers gunned down in Arkansas?  The media reporting here did not interview people who spoke of the hate crime in terms of a war, they described Abdulhakim’s jihad in far more neutral terms.  Completely forgotten are the innocent women and children all over the world who are murdered by the religion of peace.  The death of a lone abortionist is a rallying point?  This bizar-o-land — our 21st-century United States.

This is puerile and vapid because the outrage is manufactured to make a political point.  The victims of Islam do not have political interest groups pressuring the president.  This abortionist does, and was hailed as a hero?!?  For what?  Vacuuming the unborn out of their mothers?  Stabbing unborn children in the back of the head, or in the heart?  For doing this a thousand times?  Tiller made a lot money for practicing his trade.   What was heroic?

If anything, the assassination of this doctor deserves less outrage than the murder of Pvt. Long.   Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad was looking to kill anyone wearing a military uniform; Scott Roeder was looking for Tiller.  What is more dangerous to society as a whole?  Both acts are 100% wrong.  Both injure all of us.   Muhammad’s action has broader implications than Roeder’s.

Making political hay of a murder is almost as vile as the murder itself. Such an overt appearance of valuing one victim’s life over another’s is also damaging to society precisely because, in the process, the victim is objectified.  To treat the death of Pvt. Long in a way so substantially different than that of Dr. Tiller is appalling.  All human life deserves to be protected.  Favored classes reduce all of us.

Comrade Obama

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

abc.jpg

This is wild.  It appears we truly are moving toward a soviet style government.  Obama and his pack of thugs are now taking over the media.  It is not enough that they call him God, and have shivers up and down their legs, or a lump in their throat, or tears in their eyes.  Nope.  Being sycophants  is not enough.  Obama and his team are out for direct control.

I recommend we rename ABC ‘Truth’ (pravda) and we rename NBC ‘News’ (isvestia).  Then we will be able to say as they did in the USSR – there is no truth in the news and no news in the truth.  The next move is to teach our troops to goosestep.

It is not enough for Obama to control GM and Chrysler.  It is not enough for Obama to control the banks.  Obama wants to control the pay of all employees of all publicly held companies.  Obama wants to control the health industry outright.  To do this Obama needs to even further tighten his control of the flow of public information.  This is done by controlling the programing directly at the ‘objective’ news outlets.  Just in case the poor little dears don’t get it, move the anchor into the white house.  This will bring order.

We are seeing the government taking over the economy, the media and health services.  The czars who are in charge of all these functions do so without congressional oversight.  This is an incredible amassing of power in the presidency.  I recall the liberal loons worrying about an imperial presidency under Bush.  This is an order of magnitude worse.  Such is the nature of this much concentrated power.  Can someone please tell me how this is not becoming a dictatorial state?

How Far We Have Fallen

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

The difference could not be more stark.  On one hand we have the mind that wrote the Declaration of Independence, started one of the first wine vineyards in North America, wrote the Virginia constitution, which heavily influenced the U.S. constitution — in short a polymath, the quintessential renaissance man.  The third president of the U.S. said:

“A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”
-Thomas Jefferson

On the other hand we have the 44th president.  A man of no great distinction or accomplishment before he took office.   A man whose only accomplishment is getting elected.  A man who unlike previous presidential nominees campaigned with the media wind at his back.  This man said:

“We are out of money!”
-Barak Obama

After a $2T spending spree, this man had the nerve to even sound mildly surprised. The difference in philosophy could not be more stark. Jefferson lionized the yeoman farmer, the independent land owner.  Obama’s philosophy, on the other hand, is to foster dependence on the the central government.

We certainly cannot afford Obama and his policies.  The question is, can we survive the fallout.  Most of the damage already done boggles the mind.  We will be paupered by this spending.

Trust Requires Virtue

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Currently, I do not trust Republicans any more than I do the Democrats.  That is correct, while Democrats are more destructive to this nation than the Republicans, it is a question only of degree.  6000 earmarks vs. 10000 – such choices do not cause me to run out and vote Republican, let alone donate money, time and energy.  When I see Republicans in the first decade of the 21st century acting and talking like Democrats from the 70’s, it is time to bar the door.

Despite the hatred poured out on G.W. Bush by out-of-power and power-hungry Democrats/Socialists, he was a Democrat from the 1960-70’s era.  Bush was big on defense and conservative in his instincts, but he was also a big government, social-safety-net big-spender.  J. Rockefeller would have been comfortable in Bush’s White House. Fiscally, the Bush era policy looked a lot like Johnson’s guns-and-butter policy.  The wild increases in federal domestic spending in education and in government subsidies for health care should have made any honest Democrat shout with glee.  This was the conservative president I voted for?

The late Bill Buckley put it very well, “Bush is conservative, BUT, Bush not a conservative.” His father and brother are cut from the same cloth. Jeb Bush just showed his true colors – in short Jeb is a sellout when it comes to principles and seeks office and power before anything else.  There are other modern-day Rockefeller Republicans in the party.  While I welcome them, they have no business driving the boat.  The base of the party consists of conservatives of many stripes.  The party leadership forgot this.  In poll after poll it is shown that 34% of the country self-identifies as conservative, but only 21% self-identifies as Republican.  Do the math, your misguided policies have alienated over a third of conservatives. This is what happens when one listens to the likes of Arlen Specter, John McCain, and George Bush.  I am supposed to feel I have a stake in the Republican Party when the likes of these three are the voice of ‘my’ party?

Tacking further to the left will not save you.  In 2002 and 2004, many Democrats ran for Congress as ersatz Republicans and lost.  People will always vote for the genuine article.  Republicans’ becoming more like Democrats is something that the New York Times will applaud.  John McCain was the latest dupe to walk down that garden path.  Listening to the left wing media as to what our policies ought to be is akin to taking advice from Germans for routing our troop and supply convoys in the Atlantic circa 1942 to 1945.  MSM is not a friend of Republicans; repeat this every morning — five times while looking in the mirror.

Republicans tried the moderate candidate recently with our presidential pick, John McCain.  The only time McCain lead in the poles was after he brought on Palin and before he went to Washington to APPROVE the bailout.  Note that the more conservative he appeared the better McCain did.  It was McCain’s support of the Bush administration’s TARP that finally sunk him, not Palin.  Do not listen to the voices of MSM or the Rockefeller establishment Republicans in this matter.  McCain’s trouble was McCain, not Palin.  It was McCain’s embarrassing grandstand over the TARP and the Bush administration’s spending another $700B of the people’s money that did in McCain.  Not only did it cost us the White House, it was this act that made Obama’s even more over-the-top spending possible.

When it comes to spending, Republicans now have no credibility in this matter.  Saying they are not as bad a Democrats is very small comfort.  It will take time to rebuild this credibility, so start now.  I recommend you start at the state level and support a governor from outside Washington who is not covered in the slime of the past eight years, the current office holders there are damaged goods. Republicans need new congressional leadership.

I need to hear a change in tone from the Republicans. Not the change in tone that General Powell is espousing, for he is in what I call the Specter-Wing of the party.  I need to see courage, not appeasement.  It was a lack of courage that kept the Republican Party supporting the RINO Specter.  For how many years, when the chips were down, did this power-seeking liberal-in-sheep’s-clothing vote against his own party?  In order to cravenly placate the likes of Specter, the Republican Party enacted policies that brought the Socialists to power today; the Republican brand is now a sorry joke.  In pursuing its holy grail of the ‘big-tent’, the Republican Party forgot about its core constituency, that is, conservatives.  In order to regain the trust of this constituency it needs to remember its principles, not Reagan’s principles but conservative principles – and put them into action by both word and deed.

I am looking for a bold message that addresses the fact that a free market system is superior to the planned economics of the Socialists.  I am looking for a message that proclaims government is not the answer to all the country’s problems – government is the source of many of the country’s problems.  Look at the current banking fiasco as an example.  The government via Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac forced banks to make loans to people who were financially incapable of buying a home.  Where was the Republican Party on this?  The gestures to halt this ruinous practice were a joke in light of the seriousness of the problem.  The reason for such feeble action is a lack of courage brought on by a lack of principle.  The Republican Party owned Congress and the White House, and they where all stopped by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd?  Show me some guts, show me that principle means more than votes, and I will begin to trust you.

Until I see the Republican Party taking MSM and its political arm, the Democrat Party, to task for its character assassination of the next crop of leaders such as Bobby Jindal, I will not trust the Republican Party.  People like Joe the Plumber should have been given at least as much help by Republicans as Miss California got from Donald Trump.  The Republican Party needed to defend Sarah Palin better.  Palin is a decent human being and successful mayor and governor – the party allowed her to be dragged through the mud.  Instead, Republicans are embarrassed because Palin does not sound like some boutique writer for the WSJ?  Most of the country speaks with a twang in its voice, and most of the country was not educated in some Ivy League school.  Throwing Palin under the bus was craven.  She deserved better.  Her lack of understanding of global politics and other trivia did not warrant, let alone justify, the party’s behavior.  At least Palin did not say there are 57 states, like the current Socialist in the White House.  Abandoning Palin hurt the brand, which was stupid on top of cowardly.

Republicans need to defend their own — loudly.  This means taking to task the Socialists and attacking them for making gaffes and anything else they do that is worthy of such attention.  It has gotten to the point that the Republican Party cowers before its foes and will not call out their obvious flaws – Reagan, Kemp and Gingrich did so with class, and with vigor – because the NYT calls this ‘mean-spirited’?  Until the party is able to articulate its positions without shame, with conviction and courage, and once again become the party of ideas, I will not trust them.  Without ideas, principles, and courage, Republicans are just office-seekers.

Who is more likely a liar?

Saturday, May 16th, 2009

If I had to choose, who would I say is the liar? The person who has documentation or the one that says they weren’t informed? Especially if the person has changed their “recollection” several times?

Washington Times report on CIA rejecting Pelosi charge.

Why do even the people of California put up with this level of deception?  It may be true that the CIA is charged with covert actions that include deceiving foreign governments, but they aren’t in the business of deceiving congress.

The reason we presently have so many problems in our country cannot be too far removed from the lack of honesty in the highest offices. If those that are supposed to be examples to our young people are dishonest, how can we expect them to be honest?