Archive for the ‘religion’ Category

When Homosexual Acts are not Sins, Neither is Stealing

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

The latest from the Anglican Church: Shoplifting is OK

When a nominally Christian church contravenes the clear meaning of the Bible on homosexual activity, why should anyone be surprised when a priest from that church also says that stealing is OK?

The Bible says, “Thou shalt not steal.” (Exodus 20:15) There are no provisos, exemptions, or caveats. Even if one steals from a rich man who would never notice the loss, and even if one is starving, or one’s children are starving, God allows no exemptions. Stealing is not just a crime against the victim, it is a crime against God. Stealing under those circumstances is telling God, “I do not trust You.”

I suspect adultery is next. Some Anglican priest will tell us it’s OK to cheat on your wife if she’s become old, ugly, or fat. Or if you’ve decided you’re really a homosexual. Oh, wait, that was a BISHOP.

Conspiracy?

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

While reading an article today, a thought ran through my mind. The part that prompted the thought was the follow:

According to the Associated Press, Anwar al-Awlaki, Hasan’s former imam from the al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia, has posted praise for Hasan, and has called on other Muslims serving in the U.S. Military to “follow in the footsteps of men like Nadal.”

If a person states that people should follow in the footsteps of someone that is a murderer, praises them for their crime, is that at least inciting murder? Could it not be considered conspiracy to commit murder?
While I am all for freedom of religion, I am not for expressing murder is okay. It is not okay for Christians to murder abortionists, it is not okay for Thugs to perform ritual strangulation, it is not okay for Islamists to perform jihad murder (or any other murder sanctioned by their religion). Praising a murderer, encouraging people to commit murder is wrong and (unless I’m mistaken) illegal. Why do those that preach violence against innocent people still walk free?

The Religion of Environmentalism

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

In the UK, at least, Environmentalism is now a officially recognized religion.  Of course, Environmentalism’s view of the world w.r.t. anthropogenic global warming has about as much factual basis as the Hindu view that the world rests upon the backs of six elephants, which in turn stand on the back of a turtle.

World Turtle

Thus, it makes sense that such beliefs must be regarded as religious, not scientific.

For the record, all historical and archeological evidence to date supports the Bible’s factual accuracy w.r.t. verifiable events.

Religion of peace?

Monday, October 5th, 2009

I read this

 Muslim men can marry non-Muslim women but a Christian man cannot marry a Muslim woman. The constitutional provisions also welcome a Christian to embrace Islam, but when a Muslim converts to Christianity, the penalty is death.

in an article in the Washington Times.

As long as a religion holds a legal double standard that would kill its own members for changing to another religion, they are not a religion of peace.

Health Care Reform: Moral Imperative?

Monday, August 31st, 2009

According to The Politico, former Vice President Al Gore believe that it is our moral duty to pass health care reform:

Gore… was loose-limbed and noticeably thinner than in recent years — and he seemed to elicit the night’s most emotional moment.

Polarization

Monday, August 17th, 2009


Polarization: a sharp division, as of a population or group, into opposing factions.

Right now, the country is in the process of becoming polarized. Liberals have covered the truth about Obama enough that his agenda, now coming out in the policies and people he chooses, are so far left that many of the right are not just unhappy, they are more than angry. The right is enraged.

How is this possible? It is possible because the only people in power are politicians. There are so few politicians that actually care about the issues from a standpoint of doing what is right, that regardless of which side they are working, they do it for the wrong reasons. (Not all … I particularly support KC4AG because he is principled in his decisions … consider that a shameless plug!) Many of the Republicans are there not because they believe how they vote, but do so to “represent” the people. I’m sorry, but I think that is wrong.

Because there are no fundamental universal principles for the country, it is inevitable that it fracture. Why can’t we just get along? Because there are those that call evil good and good evil, we cannot get along. It doesn’t matter which set of good and evil each side holds; it only matters that what is in view is total polarization.

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

Because we have no absolutes in common, because so many will call evil what so many others call good, the country cannot stand. The house divided against itself cannot stand.

Do two walk together
unless they have agreed to do so?

There is no agreement among the people of this country. So the people cannot walk together. Without the glue that binds us, the moral/religious views that brought the people here in the first place, this country becomes a house divided against itself. It cannot stand.

Assasination v. Hate Crime

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

The murder of Dr. Tiller was the textbook definition of an assassination.  It is a crime for which there is no excuse, and is appalling.  The murder of the Pvt. William A. Long, a soldier outside an Arkansas recruiting station, was the textbook definition of a hate crime.  It is also a crime for which there is no excuse, and is also appalling.  Scott Roeder, the alleged assassin, picked his target because of what he did – killed the unborn past the 20th week.  Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad allegedly picked his targets because of what they are – soldiers in the U.S. Army.

The assassination received over ten times as much press coverage as the hate crime.  Why is this? The coverage of  Matthew Shephard was even more extensive.  Are abortionists ten times more valuable than soldiers?  Are gay men ten times more valuable than straight?  What is driving the outcry in one case but the relative silence in the other?

Why is the president’s response so different? From the Weekly Standard, the following contrast shows what is valuable in Obama’s world:

“I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe.”

The above was in reference to the murder of an American soldier by a Muslim on his personal Jihad.  The following was in reference to the murder of an abortionist:

I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.

The tone could not be more different.  The murder of a soldier in the name of a violent religion is not heinous?  Islamists commit over 2000 acts of violence per year on unarmed civilians.  That is a world wide pandemic, it is not senseless, it is the purposeful act of terrorizing those who do not submit, and that is certainly heinous.  One miserable lunatic breaks the 6th Commandment targeting an abortion doctor and the liberal media makes political hay over it.  The president, whose voting record on abortion is solidly in the NARAL/NOW camp, joins in the fray.  This is cowardice and opportunism on many planes.

All lives are precious.  It appears Obama holds some in higher regard than others.  It appears that in Obama’s world view, and in the world view of the press, abortionists deserve more outrage than soldiers.  It appears in Obama’s worldview that a single pathetic loon deserves more attention than the 1284 Muslims who attacked people outside of Iraq and Afghanistan — and in the US.  The single doctor is the victim of a heinous act.  Killing 5061 people world-wide in 2008 alone in the name of the ‘religion of peace’ is just senseless?

Where is the outrage for the soldiers gunned down in Arkansas?  The media reporting here did not interview people who spoke of the hate crime in terms of a war, they described Abdulhakim’s jihad in far more neutral terms.  Completely forgotten are the innocent women and children all over the world who are murdered by the religion of peace.  The death of a lone abortionist is a rallying point?  This bizar-o-land — our 21st-century United States.

This is puerile and vapid because the outrage is manufactured to make a political point.  The victims of Islam do not have political interest groups pressuring the president.  This abortionist does, and was hailed as a hero?!?  For what?  Vacuuming the unborn out of their mothers?  Stabbing unborn children in the back of the head, or in the heart?  For doing this a thousand times?  Tiller made a lot money for practicing his trade.   What was heroic?

If anything, the assassination of this doctor deserves less outrage than the murder of Pvt. Long.   Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad was looking to kill anyone wearing a military uniform; Scott Roeder was looking for Tiller.  What is more dangerous to society as a whole?  Both acts are 100% wrong.  Both injure all of us.   Muhammad’s action has broader implications than Roeder’s.

Making political hay of a murder is almost as vile as the murder itself. Such an overt appearance of valuing one victim’s life over another’s is also damaging to society precisely because, in the process, the victim is objectified.  To treat the death of Pvt. Long in a way so substantially different than that of Dr. Tiller is appalling.  All human life deserves to be protected.  Favored classes reduce all of us.

Perez Hilton — Intellectual Titan

Friday, May 8th, 2009


This is the intellectual titan that Keith Olbermann and the null entity known as Michael Musto, a writer for the Village Voice, were referring to in their little locker room tryst on air at MSNBC. When one compares the poise of Miss California verses the ‘I filled my shorts’ invective of Perez — whose real name is Mario Armando Lavandeira, a Cuban American from Miami — one can see who is rooted in reality, and who is living in a bubble.  The crowd cheered Miss California for here respectful but gutsey reply.  She did not kow-tow to Perez who was obviously trolling for support for his personal beliefs.

Perez’s you-tube rant is a classic display of a four year old throwing a temper tantrum.  Poor baby, did not get what he wanted.  Perez is a bully, a coward and a liar; the best part is that he puts it all on display himself without any coaxing.  Kiethie and Mikey are filling the role’s of Hilton’s goons, piling it on, which only makes them look smaller and more cowardly than Perez.

Diversity is not just about skin color, and cultural dress. It is about having diverging points of view and being respectful of those who differ with you. The gay mafia goes for the jugular whenever anyone has the temerity to voice their preference as something outside todays pop-culture orthodoxy; this orthodoxy demands marriage is a fungible edifice to be construed in whatever way is currently fashionable.

The boob job, the pictures, all this is just the concerted effort to destroy someone. And for what? Saying something like, “I believe in traditional marriage”? Obama said this very thing, but he was to suffer no such outrage. I am willing to bet the farm that Kiethie, Mikey and Marie all voted for the messiah. The hypocrisy here stinks to the heavens — tolerance my foot.

Right Wing Extremists

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Sally posted this recently as a comment and I feel that it is too important to be overlooked.  Thank you Sally for bringing this to our attention.  This was Sally’s comment:

You all have probably seen this, but stepped up Homeland Security against right wing:

“WASHINGTON – A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed “right-wing extremists” concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats….”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803

The first line is underlined and says “A newly unclassified Document….”.  You only have to click on this site and read the report.  Talk about catagorizing certain Americans into a “paranoid” group!  This coming from a PARANOID government.  And this is what the government thinks about you if you subscribe to just one of these ideas.  Why can’t they be Left-Wing Extremists?

This is what Obama considers as “uniting us”?  Talk about division.  I wonder if this is how King George envisioned the colonials of America?  Doesn’t say much for the intelligence of our military either.  This read is a total abomination!

btw  Read (imagine) what is going to happen to blogging and Gore’s internet because of your discourse towards the government.

The Morals Of Higher Education

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

The University of Maryland wants porn but doesn’t want prayer!  The students and university senate can vote and nullify the graduation invocation on their own.  The reason being what their “peer” schools do or believe in.  A Md. state senator was going to threaten with-holding state funds on the porn issue but was later informed by the judiciary that that wasn’t allowed by law.  The 2 news sources I used are liberal and conservative so that both sides were represented equally.  You decide.

I am just thankful that the America of my father was good enough for me and that I was able to instill those values in my children.  My last child was exclusively schooled in a church school and my oldest daughter decided to totally homeschool both my grandbabies.  I guess the sign of the times is showing its butt-crack!

The Real Messiah

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

For all you nay-saying liberals out there I just want you to know the truth.  During the invocation at the Martinsville NASCAR race, the minister said, and I quote: “…and we pray you give us hope; REAL HOPE, in these economic hard times.  Thank you for giving us your one and only son and it is in Jesus’ name we pray, AMEN.”

Now I knew who he was talking about when he said “real hope” but the Jesus part just cinched it.  Your Pope-of-Hope-on-Dope is a fraud.  I am now the second one to tell you.  It is time for you to convert! 

Religious Fundamentalism and the Middle East

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

Muslims as well as Jewish beliefs are both bible based. You have Jewish extremist on one side of the biggest problem on the planet and Muslim extremist on the other. In the middle are a lot of Jews and Muslims that do not support either one while the world takes either side of a religious argument as if it is a political problem without addressing the basic issue at hand, dogma and inaccurate accounts of history.

You can never settle the problem without dealing with religious fundamentalists on both sides of the issue. You can’t simply decide that one religious argument is more worthy than the other when neither have any merit. The problem is the perception by citizens of the world most of who don’t know anything about what is really going on in the Middle East. Jews have money and can afford court the world with rhetoric. The Palestinians don’t so just like with any political debate, the one who can afford the best PR campaigns often wins the support of the most people.

The world should isolate the two of them and act as mediators in a legitimate debate about how it got the way it is now and what to do about it. When the Jews run out of patience and money, that is what they will do anyway, sit down and talk. Either that, or when Obama sits down with Iran, it will very hard for Israel to hold fast to the kind one sided argument for why they are right and everyone else in the Middle East is wrong anymore.

Just war, Palestine, Gaza and Israel

Saturday, January 10th, 2009


Some history:

Ancient history:

Abram, a.k.a. Abraham, from the city of Ur in what was most likely Persia, moved into the region as a nomadic tribal chief of a militaristic clan. As “chosen” people, his offspring were promised the land by God, and succeeded in taking it by force (if the Biblical accounts are correct, it was miraculous force more than anything else–God seeing to it that his promise was fulfilled more than militaristic prowess on the part of the Israelites). A state of Israel was established, and the Israelites inhabited the land, exterminated the people that lived there before them, and became a moderate power. They were less than faithful to the religion and fell out of disfavor, were overrun and deported to Babylon for a period of about 70 years. After those 70 years, they were allowed to return to their ancestral home, and became a subservient state. Sometimes serving one or another “superpower” of the time, it continued in this path until about 70 A.D. at which time it was again thoroughly wiped out by Rome and did not rise as a separate country of means for hundreds of years. During the 7th century, the area came under Muslim control, being under the control of different factions until the Ottoman empire took control in the 16th century.

Recent history:

That lasted until the 20th century; many of the Jews (those of the Israelites who were primarily of Judah) started returning to Israel. The area was under British rule for much of that time. Ultimately, the state of Israel was established by the United Nations in 1947. The land was divided; part was established as a Jewish state, part to remain Arab. The Jews agreed, while the Arabs did not. War resulted in 1948, and the cease-fire established boarders for the time being. (700,000 Palestinians fled, and much of the problem now reflects back to what of them…something like the Jews claim to the land from 2000 years ago.) Many of the Arab states refuse to accept a legitimacy for the state of Israel to exist (some of which could be from some Muslims’ religious beliefs that refuse to accept that land once conquered by Muslims can ever be anything but Muslim; the doctrine demands those lands must be reclaimed). The 1967 war started when Israel believed it was on the brink of an invasion with her access to the Red Sea cut off, UN peace keepers expelled, and troops amassed on her boarders. The pre-emptive strike was swift and decisive (you would almost think the war was of the same miraculous nature of millennia ago with Israel defeating its foes more rapidly than could be imagined otherwise). Israel ceased Gaza, the West Bank, Sinai, and Golan Heights as spoils of war.

Present:

Right now, Israel has long stated that Palestinians have a right to a homeland, but the reverse is not true. There are few Arab nations that have ever acknowledged Israel’s right to exist. The present conflict seems to be over what Israel will not accept (rockets being launched at their cities by people in Gaza with full complicity of the Government of Gaza).

Personally, I have little compassion for either side, but I would have to say that the Hamas leadership is being totally stupid. Israel is known for the fact that they will defend their citizens with overwhelming force. Pushing violence at Israel is a little like standing over a fire and pouring on gasoline to try to put it out. Those that want to destroy the state of Israel ought to get a life. They need to move on in life—in a sense, they occupied Israel for about two millennia, and now Israel is back—get over it and get on with life. Israel went through hard times, and they have put others through hard times as well. At this point, they are fighting for a national survival, but many nations do not survive. There are still some people that were more than likely around when Great Britain started the movement of Jewish people into the area; they have the greatest claim on the issues, but they tried war and lost. In the scheme of things, the Israelite nation is still in the throws of being born. The Arabs are trying to make sure the nation is stillborn. The problem is that Israel came out fighting harder and more effectively than those that had occupied her lands for thousands of years.

While I might think the Palestinians should move on, I also recognize they could say the same thing about the Jews. (They did not “move on” for the 2000 years they were dispersed!) Given that both groups are just as stubborn as each other, I don’t see this as ever ending. Neither side is going to give up; neither side is going to completely leave the area. (I do have to admit, the state of Israel did allow for a Palestinian people to have a homeland … it might not have been all the Palestinians wanted, but it was a homeland, and that is more than the Palestinians are willing to give Israel.) Hamas can end the present conflict tomorrow, all they have to do is acknowledge Israel and guarantee they will stop all rocket and mortar attacks coming from Gaza (even if it means prosecuting those that attempt to attack).

Merry Christmas To Everyone!

Thursday, December 25th, 2008

Thanks and praise be to God for all He has done in my life, saving me from myself over and over again. By rights I should be dead by now, certainly not having lived to the age of 48, and certainly not with a fantastic wife, daughters and entire family still able to enjoy each others’ company, along with job, house and all of the little things that make life more wonderful than I usually even admit.

I don’t have the Christian thing down; after reading Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments many years ago, at a time of soaring pride and thoroughgoing agnosticism, I assented intellectually to the fact that Jesus is the savior – but the demons also believe this, so simply knowing the fact is not much to hang my hat on. Hence I do not call myself a Christian at this time.

But I am a hanger-on to the Good News, which is why Christmas has always meant so much to me. In the Christian narrative, the Resurrection is essential, and deservedly stands as the element which provokes so much wonder and debate – but when you think about it, the Incarnation was really quite the trick. God-Outside-Of-Time is not easily construed as also one particular human being. Logically, comparing the essential natures of the two, it does not make any sense at all.

Yet that is what Christianity proclaims and what makes it unique, and what is symbolized by the Christmas holiday: In the midst of our broken and fallen state, God reached out to us. Because we could not do it, he made the first move – even though it defies all comprehension.

This notion of Divine grace which makes no sense at all tracks with my personal experience. I am fallen beyond all description, my attempts at “goodness” have in every instance been eclipsed by overwhelmingly bad behavior, and in these 48 years my “merit ledger sheet” is deeply, deeply in the red. Morally and spiritually, I am a frickin’ basket case. But God has seen fit to keep me alive.

In my daily life I barely have the faith of a mustard molecule, much less the whole seed. The world imposes challenges to faith that, to me, are currently insurmountable. So for me to ascend the steps to God – fuhgedaboudit. On my own volition I can’t even get near the staircase. There is so much wrong with the world and my personality and the universe that Divinity is billions of light years away from my outstretched arms. It is impossible to even conceive of the number of years it would take for me to find the way to God.

So what happens is, God finds a way to me. When my guard is down He infects me with compassion and appreciation for the people around me. He helps me perceive the beauty of my surroundings, the overflowing wonderfulness of my family and our home and our community and this country – when my nature is dead-set on emphasizing the awfulness of everything.

In addition to clarifying the goodness in my life which any idiot could recognize but which remained opaque to me, God has at the same time given me perspective on the tragedies. I could not process the bad stuff people have done: God convinced me – again, while my guard was down – that I deserved every little bit of nastiness I suffered. I could not rationalize the horror of bad things happening to people I loved: God gave me the understanding that this was the way of all things. Everybody dies. Every mortal coil has a built-in breaking point. Knowing that has informed my perception of every human relationship in my life.

Not a whit of the above ruminations came from me. In fact, for most of my life, I have rebelled against all of those ideas. But despite my best efforts I am not able to maintain control of how I look at the world – I give up. And at that point, I am able to see another perspective. When my life situation has seemed hopeless, suddenly things were not so bad. When the sadness seemed about to become unmanageable, the viewpoint shifted.

God has intruded into my life in such significant ways over the years that I can’t describe my life accurately without reference to His influence. And it all begins with Christmas: God taking the first step.

NVTH Christmas Thread

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

In case I have despoiled this front page with the Scorpion Lady pictures and dope stories, I will take this opportunity to direct you to ACT’s Christmas post here, which is generating an intense comment thread.

If you are here to hang out and chat, that’s where you should be. Sorry for the irreverance.