novatownhall blog

Where you are held accountable for your convictions and record

Browsing Posts in Uncategorized

It is well known that progs are more impulsive:

Evidence suggests that these personality differences between liberals and conservatives begin to emerge at an early age. A 20-year longitudinal study by Jack and Jeanne Block showed that those who grew up to be liberals were originally assessed by their preschool teachers as more emotionally expressive, gregarious, and impulsive when compared to those who became conservatives, who were considered more inhibited, uncertain, and controlled. Liberals may show greater tolerance for diversity and creativity, but they may also be more impulsive, indecisive, and irresponsible. On the flip side, conservatives may be organized, stable, and thrifty, but also have stronger just-world beliefs (leading to a greater tolerance for inequality), and stronger fears of mortality and ambiguity. Even recent neuroscience work published in Current Biology from University College London identifies fundamental differences in the partisan brain. Brain scans revealed a larger amygdala in self-identified conservatives and a larger anterior cingulate cortex in liberals, leading the researchers to conclude that conservatives may be more acute at detecting threats around them, whereas liberals may be more adept at handling conflicting information and uncertainty.

The amygdala is “[shown] in research to perform a primary role in the processing of memory, decision-making, and emotional reactions, the amygdalae are considered part of the limbic system.”

But recent research has “found that study participants who reported seeking high levels of stimulation or excitement or a tendency to act on impulse had reduced cortical thickness in brain regions associated with decision making and self-control, particularly in the anterior cingulate and the middle frontal gyrus.”

So despite having larger anterior cingulate cortices, the reduced cortical thickness reduced the functionality of those regions.

Science is proving the truth of Dr. Savage’s aphorism: “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder”

Dr. Savage’s comment on liberalism has scientific backing now:

Mind control: Scientists can now make people alter their prejudices and belief in God

When the researchers disabled one part of the brain which is used for complex problem-solving, the subjects became more liberal. Fortunately, this effect was temporary, and the subjects recovered their senses. The damage to James Brady’s frontal lobe, unfortunately, was permanent, and resulted in his being a liberal the rest of his life.

What is The Most Important Job in Society? Motherhood.

Liberalism, particularly feminism, with its misguided focus on some faux “equality” between men and women (they change the definition of equal to mean “the same”) has dehumanized the human fetus and devalued motherhood. I guess in their twisted weltanschauung, if a man can’t do it, it’s not worth doing. How sexist is that!?

But there it is — only women can bear children. As “liberalism” and “feminism” (liberalism is not about liberty, but subservience to the government, and feminism is not about the wonder that is femininity, but about how to make women more like men) devalue motherhood, and try to make women more like men, our birth rates are dropping precipitously. Liberalism and feminism are killing western civilization.

There is nothing more important to a civilization than the next generation, and nothing more important to the creation of the next generation, and to civilizing it, than mothers. One man can father hundreds of children, but women, not so many.

So why do liberalism and it’s evil offspring, feminism, devalue motherhood? Why do they devalue that which makes women more valuable than men to civilization? Can it be to destroy Western Civilization?

Open Post


What you have to say is important….or not, depending on who you are. Regardless, get it off your chest or just tell us what we are missing out on in this appropriate space. Can’t think of anything? Recite your favorite Dr. Seuss book, which goes nicely with the goofiness of today’s environment.

According to Black Lives Matter co-founder Marissa Jenae Johnson, the answer is

What it’s gonna take to dismantle white supremacy is white folks actually gotta give up something. You have to actually sacrifice yourself. You have to be willing to give up the things that you currently benefit from.

I benefit from having an education. Should I give that up? Should I not send my kids to school to bring them down to your level?

I benefit from not committing crimes? Should I commit crimes to bring myself down to your level?

I benefit from having had married parents. My children benefit from having married parents. Should I divorce my wife to bring my kids down to your level?

How about this, instead of trying to bring Whites down to your level, how about trying to bring Blacks up to ours?

Where is “Asian Lives Matter”? Where is “Jewish Lives Matter”? Where is “Irish Lives Matter”? (And if you don’t think they had problems with discrimination, remember this?)

Why do they not have the same problems Blacks do? Culture.

Black violent crime is about eight times the White rate. Blacks have children out-of-wedlock (bastards) at more than twice the rate Whites do, and at more than four times the rate Asians do. Blacks are more likely than Whites to default on a mortgage, at all income levels.

If there is such a thing as “White Privilege”, it is because Whites earned it. They earned it by working hard, getting an education, getting married before they had children, being law-abiding citizens, and by paying their debts.

Instead of trying to bring Whites (and Asians and Jews) down, try bringing yourselves up.

Don’t you hate it when the title of an article is a lie?

Well, this one isn’t, but the title of the article I’m citing is:

The Economist explains: Why lesbians tend to earn more than heterosexual women

They don’t actually explain why lesbians earn more than heterosexual women.

They come up with a few theories, but neglect the obvious one. Most of the mythical “pay gap” comes from women’s choosing flexibility, fewer hours, easier work, less STEM work, etc. Well, if lesbians’ brains are wired more like men, they would be making career choices more like men do. Similarly, the first article cited shows that homosexual men (who would probably choose more like heterosexual women do) earn less than men.

You make your choices, live with the consequences.

0bama will nominate a Black Muslim lesbian and yell racism, sexism, homophobia, and Islamaphobia when the Repubicans try to block her confirmation.

The Repubicans will cave.