novatownhall blog

Where you are held accountable for your convictions and record

07-31-08oilsurge.jpg

The Democrat party decided they would go on vacation without allowing a vote on off shore drilling, or on shore drilling or any kind of other than that of oil executives. In fact when the Republicans stayed in order to stir up debate regarding oil relief the Democrat party leadership ordered the lights turned off. From the Politico

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democrats adjourned the House, turned off the lights and killed the microphones, but Republicans are still on the floor talking gas prices.

Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders opposed the motion to adjourn the House, arguing that Pelosi’s refusal to schedule a vote allowing offshore drilling is hurting the American economy. They have refused to leave the floor after the adjournment motion passed at 11:23 a.m., and they are busy bashing Pelosi and her fellow Democrats for leaving town for the August recess.

Speaker Nancey will now go down in history with the quote “Give me vacation or give me death!” The oil issue is obvious not important enough to stick around; getting to the beach is far more important. I am not sure which would be worse than her ridiculous statement as noted in the Washington Post:

“I’m trying to save the planet; I’m trying to save the planet.”

With gas prices around $4 per gallon the American public is ready to drill. According to Rasmussen nationwide support for increasing the domestic oil supply is near 67%. Instead Nancy and Harry are seeking to punish the oil industry a la James Carter with a windfall profits tax; this tax had a huge impact, it damaged the economy and it helped get Reagan elected. Playing class warefare games with the economy did not help Carter, nor will it help Reid and Pelosi.

Obama is looking to raise taxes on the Oil companies and give $1000 to each family. This is little more than smoke and mirrors economics. With one hand Obama plans will take money from the Oil company’s. The Oil companies will then raise the prices at the pump. We, the people will pay more at the pump, and a check might then arrive in the mail. In short, nothing will get done.

Here we are thirty years later. Oil prices are now five times their 2003 average. The Democrat party is playing politics with our economy by their refusal to do anything about the oil shortage. We are at a cross roads and the race to the bottom between the two parties needs to end. The American people deserve better than the sophomoric antics or a the Democrat Speaker who turns off the lights and microphones in the peoples house.

Well we got through the three year nominating process and here we are at August 1, 2008, and it is finally time to focus on the November 2008 elections. Longtime readers of this site know I have no deep love for John McCain or his compatriots in the GOP, but deep love and politics typically have little to do with each other. This is pragmatism time.

Pragmatically speaking, Barack Obama is the candidate from hell. This guy is a disaster waiting to happen, the second coming of Jimmy Carter, and all sensible people need to do whatever they can to keep him out of the White House. Anyone with a scintilla of historical awareness should immediately understand that the bill of goods Obama is selling was put to the test, evaluated, laughed at and totally disdained in 1980. America changed when Ronald Reagan was elected, not solely because Reagan himself was such a great human being, but moreso because Jimmy Carter had exemplified the utter stupidity of “making friends with the world” as a basis for policy. Carter came into office saying sweet things and promising to make friends with the world, and by the time he was booted out of office the world had eaten his lunch. The Soviets invaded Afghanistan, the Iranians took our people hostage, and all in all reality delivered America a knuckle sandwich. Carter gutted our military, and the crash-and-burn fiasco during the hostage rescue attempt in the Iranian desert in 1980 cemented Carter’s legacy as the worst American president in modern history. Obama, with his suggestions that our main priority should be to repair America’s image, is leading us down the same path.

So, to put a final point on this discussion of why Obama needs to be elevated in the pantheon of America’s potential problems, I give you John Hawkins’ list of Obama’s flaws. Here are just two of them:

His Inexperience: Obama has never served in the military, the House, or as a governor, was first elected to the Senate in 2004, and his battle with Hillary was the only tough campaign he has ever been in. In other words, if he’s elected, he would be one of the least worthy candidates ever to make it to the White House. If we had another 9/11 on his watch or even if one of those infamous 3 AM emergency calls that Hillary campaigned on were to come in, would you rather have Obama or McCain handling it? For that matter, would you rather have Obama or a random person picked out of the phone book handling it? Neither Obama nor the random person from the phone book would have much relevant experience, but at least the random person would probably be humble enough to realize it and ask for help, unlike Obama.

The Poor Judgment: This is a guy who stayed in a racist church and stuck by a bigoted reverend for 20 years, grotesquely leaked his Western Wall prayer to the press, and blew off a visit to see wounded troops while the whole world was watching him overseas. In other words, even when it comes to matters of mere politics, this is not a man who can be trusted to make wise decisions. So, how can we trust him to make good policy decisions for the country?

Read all of Hawkins’ essay.

Cry me a frickin’ river:

Javier Martinez, 46, a construction worker who lives in Manassas, said that a year ago he was able to send up to $1,500 a month to his wife and two children in the Mexican state of Zacatecas. Now he can only send about $500 a month. His work laying tiles has slowed down, and he can no longer find renters for the three houses he owns as immigrants have left Prince William County because of the ongoing crackdown on illegal immigrants.

(emphasis added)

In a nutshell there it is. The core of citizen outrage over illegal immigration in Northern Virginia is that the illegals are gaming the system to get away with stuff that law abiding residents would be penalized for. You can’t fight city hall – unless you happen to be facilitating the presence of illegal aliens, in which case city hall gives you a stack of get out of jail free cards, when you actually should be thrown in jail.

Buying single family homes, subdividing them into boarding houses and renting out floor space is a pretty fantastic investment arrangement which has also been against the law long before any Mexican entrepreneurs started doing it here. But our local government has decided to allow it to happen with the surge of illegal aliens into our communities.

In case you are new to the area, here is a basic primer: Boarding houses in neighborhoods are considered a bad thing because the boarders tend to behave badly.

And as the Washington Post geniuses did so elegantly and unwittingly for us two years ago, they once again document how foreign nationals have been allowed to thumb their noses at our local laws and proceed to degrade our neighborhoods.

Multiply this tile worker by a few hundred and you will suddenly understand exactly what has happened in eastern Loudoun County. You will also understand why Sterling Park residents are not only asking “where is our Board of Supervisors?” but also where the hell are our Sheriff’s Office and County Prosecutor, and why the hell Terry Wharton and his entire department are still employed.

The Center for Immigration Studies is reporting a significant decrease in the nationwide illegal alien population :

Monthly data collected by the Census Bureau through May 2008 shows a significant decline in the number of less-educated, young Hispanic immigrants in the country. The evidence indicates that the illegal immigrant population may have declined by over one million in the last year. There are strong indications immigration enforcement is responsible for at least part of the decline. The economy also is likely playing a role.

Among the findings:

Our best estimate is that the illegal immigrant population has declined by 11 percent through May 2008 after hitting a peak in August 2007.

The implied decline in the illegal population is 1.3 million since last summer, from 12.5 million to 11.2 million today.

The estimated decline of the illegal population is at least seven times larger than the number of illegal aliens removed by the government in the last 10 months, so most of the decline is due to illegal immigrants leaving the country on their own.

One indication that stepped-up enforcement is responsible for the decline is that only the illegal immigrant population seems to be affected; the legal immigrant population continues to grow.
Another indication enforcement is causing the decline is that the illegal immigrant population began falling before there was a significant rise in their unemployment rate.

The importance of enforcement is also suggested by the fact that the current decline is already significantly larger than the decline during the last recession, and officially the country has not yet entered a recession.

While the decline began before unemployment rose, the evidence indicates that unemployment has increased among illegal immigrants, so the economic slow-down is likely to be at least partly responsible for the decline in the number of illegal immigrants.

There is good evidence that the illegal population grew last summer while Congress was considering legalizing illegal immigrants. When that legislation failed to pass, the illegal population began to fall almost immediately.

If the decline were sustained, it would reduce the illegal population by one-half in the next five years.

The full report.

A clear trend is emerging, enforcement works. While Stevens Miller and others on our Board of Supervisors wring their hands over concerns of cancer and racism, a countless number of cities, counties, and states are tackling a difficult problem head on, with demonstrable results.

This also confirms that with enforcement, and a decrease in public benefits, many illegal alien residents will leave of their own accord.

Too bad our BOS refuses to lead on this issue, as has the governing body of Prince William County, and closer to home, Herndon.

We can still hope.

Obama energy policy page offers some rhetoric, and no solutions. Empty, fluffy word, pablum read below or go see for yourself.

Well, I don’t believe that climate change is just an issue that’s convenient to bring up during a campaign. I believe it’s one of the greatest moral challenges of our generation. That’s why I’ve fought successfully in the Senate to increase our investment in renewable fuels. That’s why I reached across the aisle to come up with a plan to raise our fuel standards… And I didn’t just give a speech about it in front of some environmental audience in California. I went to Detroit, I stood in front of a group of automakers, and I told them that when I am president, there will be no more excuses — we will help them retool their factories, but they will have to make cars that use less oil.”

Why is global warming a moral challenge? Assuming anthropogenic exists, and the science is still weak, is this not instead a technical challenge? This could be an issue of survival for the species, culture or nation, depending on how deep the impact of the warming. This is not a moral issue. Stealing from you neighbor, killing your neighbor, sleeping with his wife are moral issues. Failing to insulate you house, or sleeping in the road, while dumb, are not moral issues.

Note that Obama’s ‘solution’ is to attack the domestic auto manufacturers. This coupled with his plan to increase taxation on investments and to treat them as income will quickly have us remembering the good old days under Jimmy Carter. Furthermore, since when does the constitution empower the government to meddle in factory design. For shining examples of government lead industrial policy see any one of the Soviet Unions five year plans.

Then there are Obama’s disastrous cap and trade ideas as espoused on his website …

Obama supports implementation of a market-based cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions by the amount scientists say is necessary: 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Obama’s cap-and-trade system will require all pollution credits to be auctioned. A 100 percent auction ensures that all polluters pay for every ton of emissions they release, rather than giving these emission rights away to coal and oil companies. Some of the revenue generated by auctioning allowances will be used to support the development of clean energy, to invest in energy efficiency improvements, and to address transition costs, including helping American workers affected by this economic transition.

So we are to be limited to creating one fifth of the CO2 we generated in 1990? We are to do this without nuclear power as well. Windmills people, we are tilting toward windmills, except when they are to be built anywhere within 40 miles of Ted Kennedy’s summer home. The economic dislocation wrought by this policy will make the great depression look like an era of prosperity. The energy policy is less about energy than it is about reducing CO2 regardless of the social impact. This is not an energy policy but a hysterical global warming policy. Al Gore would be proud.

Our country is growing, our economy, despite George Bush, will continue to grow as well. There is no science that even remotely suggests that we can meet our future needs and cut that much CO2 production. The science concerning the link between warming and CO2 emission is immature. Most critically the impact to our economy given worst case scenario from the U.N. documentation in this issue will be less destructive than this policy.

This is a policy born from one end of the political spectrum. If Obama is about change, as he alleges ad nauseam, if he is about reaching across the aisle then where are the practical aspects of the policy that take into account: the current need for a greater oil supply; the need for a transitional energy source that will keep the economy going as opposed hand outs for the unemployed; a willingness to investigate the deployment of proven as opposed to hoped for (mythological) energy sources?

Obama’s campaign site contains a laundry list of pie in the sky list of wants. This is not a plan but a long drawn out slogan with partisan anti business, anti-growth overtones. It is demands the current energy providers fund their future competition. Such behavior only happens willingly in totalitarian junta;’s or in the mythology of the environmental left.

The Other McCain – who I once got to know a little but could not nearly keep up with when the time came to walkabout a local political event – has been absolutely on fire as a blogger and semi-freelancer since he left the flagging Washington Times.

(And if you haven’t already purchased two copies of his book, podner, you and your loved ones are missing out).

No huge fan of the Maverick McCain – in fact, possibly one of the most cogent critics of the Maverick McCain – Stacy McCain has been assembling an absolutely damning collection of information on Barack Obama.

Ladies and gentlemen, if John McCain cannot prevail over Barack Obama in the upcoming presidential election, we will know that a) John McCain is the dumbest politician in the history of the world, and b) Western Civilization has officially entered the “End of Western Civilization” phase for tidy documentation in the final episode of the History Channel series.

I strongly recommend checking in on The Other McCain, the one-man content machine, daily. You will find a buffet of entertaining commentary and news, as well as such important revelations about Obama like the following:

He sends his two kids to private school:

Their daughters attend the private University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, where annual tuition ranges from $15,528 for kindergarten to $20,445 for high school.

That’s for his kids. Not your kids:

Speaking recently before the American Federation of Teachers, he described the alternative efforts as “tired rhetoric about vouchers and school choice.”

Mr. Obama told an interviewer recently that he opposes school choice because, “although it might benefit some kids at the top, what you’re going to do is leave a lot of kids at the bottom.”

Here’s another good post.

Clinton had to deal with his bimbo eruptions – women who were impolitic enough to appear publicly as human beings – but Obama’s achilles heel is even more in the theme of classic tragedy: HE himself is the bimbo, the nitwit, the increasingly obvious fraud. In his public presence he unveils his very unlikeable self. If he could somehow manage his public image, dole it out in a controlled manner, he might be able to squelch the nasty truths until election day. But America in 2008 does not work that way.

It is not even August, and the mainstream media is tanking and desperately hungry, and they can only hate McCain a little bit, and the Obama campaign is this big honking zephyr of lies. By October the pundits and reporters – not to mention the special interests – will be on that action like the NOAA on Hurricane Hugo. Already there is a mountain of quotes from Obama, his wife, his pastor and his friends which should make any American’s hair stand up on end. If you want to keep current on that developing news, tune in to The Other McCain.

aliens_vs_delgaudio2.jpg

Yes, my friends, just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water